Widgets Magazine
Page 69 of 70 FirstFirst ... 1964656667686970 LastLast
Results 1,701 to 1,725 of 1747

Thread: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

  1. #1701

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Just look at the gap between Paycom and the boulevard, all owned by the City and just sitting there for a decade; didn't even have a sidewalk until recently.

    It's the same across the entire length apart from the Omni and Scissortail Park.

  2. #1702

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Just look at the gap between Paycom and the boulevard, all owned by the City and just sitting there for a decade; didn't even have a sidewalk until recently.
    There's always a lot of people jaywalking in that block when there are events at Paycom, too. It probably needs a mid-block crossing, similar to what's on Reno on the north side of Paycom or on the north end of the Park.

  3. #1703
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,897
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    That's because the City or the state own all that frontage and the setbacks are huge.

    The only exception is the Omni, and that's because it was a completely City-driven development.
    Agreed, but it is part of the problem, not the whole problem. Developers are not lining up anywhere near either side of the blvd. No developments around Farmers Market. Strawberry Fields seems dead for years. Mazaheri has made no movement. The apartments by the Omni seem stalled. None of these rely on the setbacks. I can't believe putting in a round about and bringing it to grade at Classen would make these developers move.

  4. #1704

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    As I said, there is no private land to develop anywhere along the boulevard, including and especially Farmer's Market.

    The closest thing to it is the old Lumberyard owned by Mazaheri and there was just an announcement last week that that is trying to be acquired by the Stadium District group... And even that property has a big setback from the boulevard.

    These huge gaps comprised of weirdly-shaped properties are exactly why there was so much advocacy just to return everything to the original street grid and create developable land. What we have now is a 100% consequence of basically turning the old I-40 into a street-level quasi freeway with huge setbacks.

  5. #1705

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    They should use the blvd for light rail if it passes until it joins back up with Reno

  6. #1706

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Its really silly seeing a streetcar track sandwiched between a sidewalk and another sidewalk north of the boulevard. "We're going to have this random section where its not a streetcar".

  7. #1707

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    Its really silly seeing a streetcar track sandwiched between a sidewalk and another sidewalk north of the boulevard. "We're going to have this random section where its not a streetcar".
    The entire streetcar is silly. It should have its own dedicated lane for the most part and fenced off so it could go a bit faster. It also needs to be expanded and double tracked. IMO it is useless as I've walked just about as fast as anywhere it could take you.

  8. #1708

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    The entire streetcar is silly. It should have its own dedicated lane for the most part and fenced off so it could go a bit faster. It also needs to be expanded and double tracked. IMO it is useless as I've walked just about as fast as anywhere it could take you.
    it also should have been put one or more streets over and not on broadway, so that it encouraged development there rather than being where there was already development and traffic

  9. #1709

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    it also should have been put one or more streets over and not on broadway, so that it encouraged development there rather than being where there was already development and traffic
    It just seems like it would be a no brainer to get extend this to Paseo, Plaza, Capitol Hill, Innovation District, and now the Boathouse District for the 2028 games.

  10. #1710

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    It just seems like it would be a no brainer to get extend this to Paseo, Plaza, Capitol Hill, Innovation District, and now the Boathouse District for the 2028 games.
    which is exactly why it won't be done... all of the no brainer ideas around the street car were just ignored. they wanted an attraction, not something for transit

  11. #1711

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Yep. It would take a lot to extend the streetcar to these great areas, but to do so before 2028 would be a great idea. But as Jedi said, won’t happen. And that’s too bad.

  12. #1712

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    As I said, there is no private land to develop anywhere along the boulevard, including and especially Farmer's Market.

    The closest thing to it is the old Lumberyard owned by Mazaheri and there was just an announcement last week that that is trying to be acquired by the Stadium District group... And even that property has a big setback from the boulevard.

    These huge gaps comprised of weirdly-shaped properties are exactly why there was so much advocacy just to return everything to the original street grid and create developable land. What we have now is a 100% consequence of basically turning the old I-40 into a street-level quasi freeway with huge setbacks.
    I know Pete posted this last week, but this is a good example of how far back the set backs are:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	County Assessor.jpg 
Views:	229 
Size:	23.7 KB 
ID:	19080

  13. #1713

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by warreng88 View Post
    I know Pete posted this last week, but this is a good example of how far back the set backs are:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	County Assessor.jpg 
Views:	229 
Size:	23.7 KB 
ID:	19080
    I really wish there was a way to see this a little better. I know my laptop is a touch screen, but when I pinch to blow up the image, all it does is get incoherently blurry.

  14. #1714

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Yesterday, they were out doing some exploratory work in the area where I believe the stadium will be located.

    The trucks were pulling away just as I got my drone in the air.











  15. Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    That last shot is awesome, Pete! Gives a great perspective of where the stadium will be.

    Has that area already been remediated from an environmental standpoint? I'm pretty sure the land that Moshe Tal owned where TK7 used to operate would at least need a Phase 2 site assessment, if not higher.

  16. #1716

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by HFAA Alum View Post
    I really wish there was a way to see this a little better. I know my laptop is a touch screen, but when I pinch to blow up the image, all it does is get incoherently blurry.
    Yeah, sorry I don't know how to blow it up any better. If you want, go to the oklahoma county assessor website: https://docs.oklahomacounty.org/Asse...aultSearch.asp.

    Click the "MAP Search" tab at the top and then zoom in to the area between Shields and 235. It will show you the set back. Then go west and look at the set backs. Just west of Western along the Boulevard is a massive set back and all private ownership.

    To Pete's earlier point, the city owns most of the land right next to the boulevard so unless you have an in with the city and can buy it from them to develop it, you are going to be well removed from it. Again, it's just a bad design.

  17. #1717

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    I know this has been discussed earlier in the thread, but will there still be a significant amount of mitigation work for the soil pollution here?

  18. #1718

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by cinnamonjock View Post
    I know this has been discussed earlier in the thread, but will there still be a significant amount of mitigation work for the soil pollution here?
    Yes.

    And the standard is much higher for residential properties (which will be a big part of the proposed development) than for something like the stadium itself.

    No idea how the developers plan to deal with this and by consensus of anyone who knows about contamination, there is no way to know the extent of buried oil tanks and other issues until they dig up the entire property. Remember that long before this was the Producer's Coop, it was a huge oilfield back when nobody even considered environmental impact.

  19. #1719
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,417
    Blog Entries
    1

    Core2shore Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    If the contamination in the area is that risky, how deep do you need to dig to determine what kinds of development would be suitable for the area.

    Looks like enough land to build the MAPS 4 Multipurpose Stadium and a future 75,000 seat 'retractable roof stadium,' beyond 2030.

  20. Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by Laramie View Post
    If the contamination in the area is that risky, how deep do you need to dig to determine what kinds of development would be suitable for the area.

    Looks like enough land to build the MAPS 4 Multipurpose Stadium and a future 75,000 seat 'retractable roof stadium,' beyond 2030.
    They would be required to dig as far down as the contaminants have seeped and to remove that soil until the site meets established levels of cleanliness. That could easily be a hundred feet or more, depending on how contaminated the site is, and would require millions of dollars of work.

    I remember when the lot on the NE corner of NW Expressway and Portland was being readied for construction of the former Circuit City location. There had been a gas station on that corner for many years, and the removal of the tanks and contaminated soil required that they remove TONS of soil. They had to be 50 to 60 feet below grade, at least to my memory.

  21. #1721

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    This is the current ownership of the various parcels in this area.

    Echo Soccer (Kanady) bought the 9 acres for $13 million last month. Beffort bought the one parcel for Mose Tal for $1.3 million; I believe Beffort bought the other Tal parcels as well but that's not what is indicated on the County Assessor site.

    You can see there are several different owners, road right-of-way, and from my understanding a bunch of railroad easements throughout.

    Depending on how things go with future acquisitions, they may be planning to create ingress/egress at Walnut Ave. The Boulevard is pretty much at ground level at that location.


  22. #1722

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    I do hope the developers have considered the cost of remediation in their figures. I would hope they already have done soil sampling, as well. It would suck if this development gets paused or canceled because of lack of forethought, with regards to how bad the soil is (or could be).

    I am assuming that the parties involved are aware of all the contamination issues, but you never know. Some people see the whole forest, then the trees come up and bite them.

    Edit to add that I do believe they have. Just know that things can sometimes not be taken into account. Trees within the forest have taken down large developments before (not just OKC).

    I look forward to seeing how this plays out!

  23. #1723

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    I do hope the developers have considered the cost of remediation in their figures. I would hope they already have done soil sampling, as well. It would suck if this development gets paused or canceled because of lack of forethought, with regards to how bad the soil is (or could be).

    I am assuming that the parties involved are aware of all the contamination issues, but you never know. Some people see the whole forest, then the trees come up and bite them.
    Echo started in the oil and gas business so I would be very surprised if they didn't do their due diligence on the cost of remediation for the property. Also, I am sure there will be a public assistance ask (TIF) for the project and whatever that is will help offset the costs.

  24. #1724

    Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    I do hope the developers have considered the cost of remediation in their figures. I would hope they already have done soil sampling, as well. It would suck if this development gets paused or canceled because of lack of forethought, with regards to how bad the soil is (or could be).

    I am assuming that the parties involved are aware of all the contamination issues, but you never know. Some people see the whole forest, then the trees come up and bite them.
    I understand what you are saying, but I am as sure as anything ever discussed on OKC Talk that the soil issues are intimately known to all parties involved. There was someone on this thread, or another one about the site, that walked us through all the issues and solutions with contamination and remediation. Very well done, and it was in 2024 IIRC. Anyone remember it?

  25. Default Re: Stadium District (formerly Producers Coop)

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    I do hope the developers have considered the cost of remediation in their figures. I would hope they already have done soil sampling, as well. It would suck if this development gets paused or canceled because of lack of forethought, with regards to how bad the soil is (or could be).

    I am assuming that the parties involved are aware of all the contamination issues, but you never know. Some people see the whole forest, then the trees come up and bite them.
    This site was obviously not contaminated to the Superfund level, as it was never listed on that. I'd be more concerned about contamination around Moshe Tal's properties than I would be the Producers Coop site. TK7 produced fuel additives and who knows if those ingredients and products were stored safely?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Rumor Mill About New Stores
    By Jesseda in forum Moore
    Replies: 302
    Last Post: 04-24-2014, 06:53 AM
  2. Oklahoma Worker Cooperative Network
    By urbanity in forum Businesses & Employers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-21-2011, 03:11 PM
  3. Spreading the word about the Oklahoma Food Cooperative
    By Celebrator in forum General Food & Drink Topics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-08-2011, 09:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO