Widgets Magazine
Page 99 of 100 FirstFirst ... 49949596979899100 LastLast
Results 2,451 to 2,475 of 2489

Thread: Expand Energy (Formerly Chesapeake)

  1. #2451

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by ChaseDweller View Post
    I hope we don't see a Kerr McGee style stealth move to Houston, where they committed to stay in OKC and then slowly moved everyone to Houston over time until they building was empty.
    Anadarko never declared that OKC was going to be the company headquarters, it was always going to remain in Houston with at best an OKC satellite office. This is not anywhere near the same type of situation and is in fact nearly the opposite.

  2. #2452

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    So, best case scenario, beside the existing 680 or so employees on that campus, what will be the net increase in employees once they've done all their consolidation?
    Completely speculative but I would guess we end up with a 900-1000 employee local presence over the next few years that grows in the long term if natural gas prices can hold around $3.00 or go up. If LNG exports ever take off, CHK will be become more aggressive in upstream development and that growth increases.

  3. #2453

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Very glad to hear CHK is staying put, seems like best case scenario situation given all the possible outcomes last few years. It would be nice if this were actually adding enough jobs to make some sort of impact but it doesn't sound like that is the case. We are no longer dependent on O&G economically but it sure would be nice if we could get another little boom from the industry!

  4. #2454

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Why are they changing the name? Is there a bad association with it?

  5. #2455

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Just learned from an employee that they have been notified that all the OKC employees of the combined organization will be consolidated into Building 15.

    Was told there is about 800 offices in there.

    Will leave just a ton of excess buildings and land.


  6. #2456

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    I posted this on this business thread because it related to the merger, but any discussion of the real estate should go here:

    Chesapeake Empire Marches On

  7. #2457

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Thanks.

    That will mean that the huge majority of their buildings will remain empty. Maybe the new entity will finally get serious about selling parts off of just leasing it out.

    However, this is a terrible time to be trying to rent Class A office space in OKC, which is why CHK has had things available for years.
    As shale matured, with covid really accelerating the process, they simply don’t need the head counts anymore. Industry wide.

    The entire logic for this M&A was how closely intertwined their assets are. Even doubling the acreage, if both companies have 5 PEs, post acquisition it can be done with 7. Maybe even 6.

  8. #2458

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Just learned from an employee that they have been notified that all the OKC employees of the combined organization will be consolidated into Building 15.

    Was told there is about 800 offices in there.

    Will leave just a ton of excess buildings and land.

    Interesting. On the surface that makes zero sense unless they are planning to sell or at minimum redevelop the rest of the original campus.

  9. #2459

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    Why are they changing the name? Is there a bad association with it?
    In general, it’s not great. Probably looking for a fresh start and I don’t blame them.

    just hope they don’t come up with something like one of the stupid names that have come out of other mergers recently.

  10. #2460

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by gopokes88 View Post
    Probably close to flat in OKC maybe grows by 100.

    $400 million in synergies translates to 500 getting laid off.

    SWN has 1,000 employees.
    ~150 stay in Houston as part of the marketing group.
    300 field employees left alone.
    500 layoffs.

    ~50-100 coming to okc. (there will be chk layoffs here.)

    They’ll grade everyone out. Lowest performers get laid off so the new company retains as much high level talent as possible.
    Maybe so. But I'll stick by my guesstimate of OKC gaining 200-250. $400M in "synergies" won't all be from G&A cuts, obviously. It'll come from a combination of G&A, capital/operational efficiencies, supply chain, etc. With a little BS mixed in there too. In my opinion, laying off half of SWN's current workforce is unlikely. That would be massive. That said, I agree there will some level of layoffs both places, unquestionably. Having been a Director at CHK for a number of years, and going through 5 layoff cycles in 6 years and having to make those decisions...ugh. I hope someday this all stops and it can become--to the extent O&G upstream can be--more stable for everyone. It's been an unprecedented 10 year run of constant cuts.

  11. #2461

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by BimmerSooner View Post
    Maybe so. But I'll stick by my guesstimate of OKC gaining 200-250. $400M in "synergies" won't all be from G&A cuts, obviously. It'll come from a combination of G&A, capital/operational efficiencies, supply chain, etc. With a little BS mixed in there too. In my opinion, laying off half of SWN's current workforce is unlikely. That would be massive. That said, I agree there will some level of layoffs both places, unquestionably. Having been a Director at CHK for a number of years, and going through 5 layoff cycles in 6 years and having to make those decisions...ugh. I hope someday this all stops and it can become--to the extent O&G upstream can be--more stable for everyone. It's been an unprecedented 10 year run of constant cuts.
    A CHK employee told me told he expects the net change to be near zero; which means a total of 650 or so. Makes sense because they plan to consolidate into a single building.

    He said some CHK employees will be sent to Spring.

  12. #2462

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    I feel like this is big news but I admit I know very little about the industry
    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...302060317.html

  13. #2463

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    This deal had to have been finalized prior to LNG export terminal permit freeze by the administration 2 or 3 weeks ago. I wonder if that will effect this deal or any others that were in the works.

  14. #2464

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    More of an event 5-10 years down the road. There's still plenty that have been permitted that will start construction. Plus if an admin change occurs in November it's quickly reversed.

  15. #2465

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices


  16. Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    This was a planned reduction as part of their merger and the sale of their final oil producing properties. They are now the largest nat gas producer.

  17. #2467

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Any word on the plans for the main campus buildings that will be emptied when they get all moved into the one building?

    Any other local companies needing newer/upgraded space that could swoop in and fill the space? I know of one that could use it but not sure they would ever spend the money.

  18. #2468
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,978
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    This was a planned reduction as part of their merger and the sale of their final oil producing properties. They are now the largest nat gas producer.
    So they lied in their announcement? They said the merger wasn’t a part of it didn’t they.

  19. #2469

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by DowntownMan View Post
    Any word on the plans for the main campus buildings that will be emptied when they get all moved into the one building?

    Any other local companies needing newer/upgraded space that could swoop in and fill the space? I know of one that could use it but not sure they would ever spend the money.
    I just saw a building permit application to start reconfiguration Building 15 so the entire organization can be consolidated there.

    But that is going to take a year or so to get everyone moved in from the various other buildings. From there, I suppose they'll get serious about what's next for the rest of the campus.

  20. #2470

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    So they lied in their announcement? They said the merger wasn’t a part of it didn’t they.
    Half-truth. This was started before the merger announcement, but they most certainly had the merger and future direction in mind when they sold Eagle Ford Shale assets. I don't think it really matters in the end.

  21. #2471

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    I have a friend that has survived every single layoff here since 2010 and I find that absolutely incredible.

  22. #2472

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Chesapeake to become Expand Energy:

    Press release:

    ***********

    Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Southwestern Energy Company Combination Expected to Close in the First Week of October
    Company to be rebranded as Expand Energy and trade on NASDAQ under "EXE" ticker symbol

    OKLAHOMA CITY and SPRING, Texas, Sept. 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: CHK) and Southwestern Energy Company (NYSE: SWN) today announced the waiting period in connection with the companies' pending combination under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 ("HSR Act") has expired. The companies expect the merger to close in the first week of October.

    Upon closing, the combined company will be the largest natural gas producer in the U.S. and assume the name Expand Energy Corporation. It will commence public trading on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol "EXE" at the open of trading the day after closing.

    "The world is short energy," said Nick Dell'Osso, Chesapeake's President and Chief Executive Officer. "With a premium scaled position across leading natural gas basins in the United States, a peer-leading returns program and a resilient financial foundation, Expand Energy is uniquely positioned to compete on an international scale to expand America's energy reach and deliver opportunity for the world's energy customers."

    About the Companies
    Headquartered in Oklahoma City, Chesapeake Energy Corporation is powered by dedicated and innovative employees who are focused on discovering and responsibly developing leading positions in top U.S. oil and gas plays. With a goal to achieve net zero GHG emissions (Scope 1 and 2) by 2035, Chesapeake is committed to safely answering the call for affordable, reliable, lower carbon energy.

    Southwestern Energy Company is a leading U.S. producer and marketer of natural gas and natural gas liquids focused on responsibly developing large-scale energy assets in the nation's most prolific shale gas basins. SWN's returns-driven strategy strives to create sustainable value for its stakeholders by leveraging its scale, financial strength, and operational execution.

  23. #2473

    Default Re: Expand Energy (Formerly Chesapeake)

    Given that Chesapeake is synonymous with AKM, is this the end of the road for Kerr family's legacy in Oklahoma energy, or does someone else in that line have a project still going?

  24. #2474

    Default Re: Expand Energy (Formerly Chesapeake)

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    Given that Chesapeake is synonymous with AKM, is this the end of the road for Kerr family's legacy in Oklahoma energy, or does someone else in that line have a project still going?
    AKM’s son owns Sienna Natural Resources. Not sure how active they are but they operate some wells in Oklahoma.

  25. #2475

    Default Re: Expand Energy (Formerly Chesapeake)

    Also another example of an energy company overthinking a post merger rebrand and coming up with a dumb generic name.

    That said, it is great to have the largest gas producer in the US HQ’d here.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Aubrey McClendon increases ownership in KSBI
    By Nermel in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-17-2009, 06:13 PM
  2. McClendon speaks out against OG&E's proposed plant
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 08:36 AM
  3. McClendon & Ward invest in KSBI TV
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 01:32 AM
  4. new to the board....
    By BricktownGuy in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 01-10-2005, 11:13 PM
  5. New to board and looking.
    By dirtrider73068 in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-05-2004, 10:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO