Widgets Magazine
Page 68 of 69 FirstFirst ... 1863646566676869 LastLast
Results 1,676 to 1,700 of 1706

Thread: Chesapeake empire marches on

  1. #1676

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by warreng88 View Post
    General question because I am too stupid to understand: Aubrey openly stated he wanted to build out the campus to employ 10,000 people. Back in 2014, GAR was $23 billion. Now, with the merger, they will employ 800 people. Was Aubrey over employing or has technology changed enough in ten years to where you don't need as many employees as much?

    Again, not trolling, not knocking Aubrey, genuinely asking...
    1) Technology has made it possible to operate large assets with much fewer people. Especially on the operations side. Things have changed a ton since 2004-2013 (when CHK experienced most of its growth). CHK was on the cutting edge of a lot of new tech so they actively helped spur the development of some of the tech that’s made life easier in the industry.
    2) They were over employing to an extent but also…
    3) They are no longer trying to lease up every square inch of the mineral rights in every play in the US. That has stopped for a multitude of reasons but primarily because there is a finite amount of drillable acreage, most of which is leased currently (tier 1 acreage at least), and commodities prices combined with some prospects not panning out has shrunk that the amount of desirable acreage (ending the massive land grabs of the 2005-2016 time frame) and to state the obvious, commodity pricing and the resulting financial disaster for CHK put an end to their leasing boom. Huge leasing plays take a huge support staff in addition to the personnel who primarily work on developing the assets so with the company’s shift to primarily focusing on development of its asset base over the last decade, they’ve needed fewer and fewer people. As an example, they had and maintained a massive title plant that housed the complete records for hundreds of courthouses across the country and hundreds of lawyers and Landman researching title there, that mostly went away after **** hit the fan and they slowed down their leasing efforts.
    4) Aubrey vertically integrated CHK which was part of the reason for the 10,000 employee campus and after around 2010-2011, CHK started spinning off anything that wasn’t part of the upstream E&P company. Access Midstream, several of the drilling and completion service companies and other components were spun off, further reducing headcount.

  2. #1677

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    1) Technology has made it possible to operate large assets with much fewer people. Especially on the operations side. Things have changed a ton since 2004-2013 (when CHK experienced most of its growth). CHK was on the cutting edge of a lot of new tech so they actively helped spur the development of some of the tech that’s made life easier in the industry.
    2) They were over employing to an extent but also…
    3) They are no longer trying to lease up every square inch of the mineral rights in every play in the US. That has stopped for a multitude of reasons but primarily because there is a finite amount of drillable acreage, most of which is leased currently (tier 1 acreage at least), and commodities prices combined with some prospects not panning out has shrunk that the amount of desirable acreage (ending the massive land grabs of the 2005-2016 time frame) and to state the obvious, commodity pricing and the resulting financial disaster for CHK put an end to their leasing boom. Huge leasing plays take a huge support staff in addition to the personnel who primarily work on developing the assets so with the company’s shift to primarily focusing on development of its asset base over the last decade, they’ve needed fewer and fewer people. As an example, they had and maintained a massive title plant that housed the complete records for hundreds of courthouses across the country and hundreds of lawyers and Landman researching title there, that mostly went away after **** hit the fan and they slowed down their leasing efforts.
    4) Aubrey vertically integrated CHK which was part of the reason for the 10,000 employee campus and after around 2010-2011, CHK started spinning off anything that wasn’t part of the upstream E&P company. Access Midstream, several of the drilling and completion service companies and other components were spun off, further reducing headcount.
    As an employee for ~4 years during that time, another thing that they were known for during that period was hiring more than they needed and paying less than they should. A lot of entry level position headcounts were probably twice what they should have been, because they were paying very low salaries (essentially coming out in the wash, G&A-wse). Don't get me wrong, I loved my time there, but sad/true.

  3. #1678

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by irishtate View Post
    As an employee for ~4 years during that time, another thing that they were known for during that period was hiring more than they needed and paying less than they should. A lot of entry level position headcounts were probably twice what they should have been, because they were paying very low salaries (essentially coming out in the wash, G&A-wse). Don't get me wrong, I loved my time there, but sad/true.
    What disciplines are you talking about?

    That's pretty wild because land personnel-wise during that timeframe they almost always exceeded the market in salary for fulltime positions. People I knew in the energy management program at OU who accepted offers from CHK had some of the best offers of anyone in the program and they were throwing out a ton of money to recruit landmen and other land related positions with 5-15+ years experience. That dropped off in 2013 but they are still close to the top of the market in compensation based on my conversation with my friends who are landmen there.

  4. #1679
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,028
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    What disciplines are you talking about?

    That's pretty wild because land personnel-wise during that timeframe they almost always exceeded the market in salary for fulltime positions. People I knew in the energy management program at OU who accepted offers from CHK had some of the best offers of anyone in the program and they were throwing out a ton of money to recruit landmen and other land related positions with 5-15+ years experience. That dropped off in 2013 but they are still close to the top of the market in compensation based on my conversation with my friends who are landmen there.
    Yes, that was the case with everyone I knew there. They were well paid, but they worked hard for it.

  5. #1680

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    I feel like the main campus will eventually get bought up by a relatively big employer. It's such a great location. I know American Fidelity has offices all over, Paycom has the offices off Reno, I believe Love's is in several buildings outside of their headquarters. I feel like it would be a great land for American Fidelity especially owing to the short distance between here and their HQ. They could use the soccer field and some of the other amenities for sure. This site would sure beat some of the ho hum offices they have some divisions in off of Portland.

  6. #1681

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    I keep hoping a large company will move to OKC and take them. Doesn't have to be Fortune 500, just a large company bring a lot of Jobs. But who knows.

  7. #1682

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    I keep hoping a large company will move to OKC and take them. Doesn't have to be Fortune 500, just a large company bring a lot of Jobs. But who knows.
    There's always an outside chance that Diamondback may move their HQ here from Midland and take up more space than they are currently but it wouldn't be enough to take up more than a building or two at most.

  8. #1683

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    There's always an outside chance that Diamondback may move their HQ here from Midland and take up more space than they are currently but it wouldn't be enough to take up more than a building or two at most.
    I remember you mentioning this in the past, and it's certainly an interesting thought given Diamondback's problems with the City of Midland as of late. That being said, do you have any other evidence that this may be a possibility, or just a hunch you have?

  9. #1684

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    I feel like the main campus will eventually get bought up by a relatively big employer. It's such a great location. I know American Fidelity has offices all over, Paycom has the offices off Reno, I believe Love's is in several buildings outside of their headquarters. I feel like it would be a great land for American Fidelity especially owing to the short distance between here and their HQ. They could use the soccer field and some of the other amenities for sure. This site would sure beat some of the ho hum offices they have some divisions in off of Portland.
    I don't think American Fidelity is interested in buying any properties. They have a lot of land they could build on at their current campus if they really wanted to.

  10. #1685

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by CitySooner View Post
    I remember you mentioning this in the past, and it's certainly an interesting thought given Diamondback's problems with the City of Midland as of late. That being said, do you have any other evidence that this may be a possibility, or just a hunch you have?
    Pretty much what you said: Just posturing from Diamondback, issues in Midland, rumors among those who work there and the fact that OKC is just an easier place to recruit talent and have an HQ. Nothing concrete but it would make a ton of sense.

  11. #1686

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    Pretty much what you said: Just posturing from Diamondback, issues in Midland, rumors among those who work there and the fact that OKC is just an easier place to recruit talent and have an HQ. Nothing concrete but it would make a ton of sense.
    Would be awesome for the city, no doubt about that.

  12. #1687

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by CitySooner View Post
    Would be awesome for the city, no doubt about that.
    That it would. Regardless, It's great that they took some space on the campus for the offices that they already had here. Just a better location for them in general and helps bring some life to the area.

  13. #1688

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    How viable would it be to turn this campus into a public school? It seems like it would be a homerun, but I honestly don't know anything about how viable it would be.

  14. #1689

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by citywokchinesefood View Post
    How viable would it be to turn this campus into a public school? It seems like it would be a homerun, but I honestly don't know anything about how viable it would be.
    It's very expensive real estate. It seems the best use for the 'brick' part of the campus would be housing and one or two hotels.

    All the buildings to the east of Classen will almost certainly stay office use.

    But there is still a ton of undeveloped land between those office buildings and the train tracks. Seems like another great spot for housing.

  15. #1690

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    The area in red will soon be completely vacated.

    It seems they could dedicate Garage #2 (plus the garage below the play field) to whatever happens there and still have 3 big garages for everything else. (Maybe Garage #1 but it is attached to Building 13 which is partially leased to another company. Garage #4 will be able to house all of CHK's staff -- 700 staff, well over 1,000 spaces.)

    Outlined in green is undeveloped land owned by Chesapeake. They've already sold a ton to MidFirst.


  16. #1691
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,706
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Might be a good place for an extension to an existing college campus.

  17. #1692

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Just me or is MidFirst a pretty useless landlord? They don’t develop much, if anything. I could be unaware, but it seems like they own a ton of stuff in the vicinity, but it sits empty/vacant unless they’re specifically using it.

  18. #1693

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by The View Post
    Just me or is MidFirst a pretty useless landlord? They don’t develop much, if anything. I could be unaware, but it seems like they own a ton of stuff in the vicinity, but it sits empty/vacant unless they’re specifically using it.
    This area is basically adjacent to some of their cooperate offices, so this is probably not something they are intending to develop for anyone but themselves. Given the age of their current building, unless they have done some renovation on their building recently, it might be cheaper/easier to move to a CHK building and also pick up some more space (possibly consolidating number offices), than eventually renovate while inhabiting the property.

  19. #1694

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by The View Post
    Just me or is MidFirst a pretty useless landlord? They don’t develop much, if anything. I could be unaware, but it seems like they own a ton of stuff in the vicinity, but it sits empty/vacant unless they’re specifically using it.
    If I were to speak as a friend of Satan, I would suggest that Nichols Hills area real estate maintains a strong value through any economic cycles. An advantage buyer, like MidFirst usually is in the area, can carry this as a held investment that grows faster than the rate of inflation, yet has a low risk of loss in value or becoming illiquid. If that banker decides to become a “visionary developer”, then they run the risk of becoming a major portion of documentaries, books, and Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalism.

  20. #1695

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    MidFirst has been renovating their buildings.

  21. Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    Quote Originally Posted by The View Post
    Just me or is MidFirst a pretty useless landlord? They don’t develop much, if anything. I could be unaware, but it seems like they own a ton of stuff in the vicinity, but it sits empty/vacant unless they’re specifically using it.
    They are a privately-owned bank, one of the largest in the country (if not THE largest). They're not developers, so it's not like they're going to build apartments or a hotel or whatever on land they purchased as a simple investment.

    I'm actually happy they own this property. It's better than having it in the hands of out-of-state developers who don't have the best interests of Oklahoma City in mind.

  22. #1697

    Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    ^

    There have been some prospective deals for the old Deep Fork property that never went forward.

    They own that entire triangle and have for quite a while, so clearly they are in no hurry to do anything.

  23. Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    The area in red will soon be completely vacated.
    I thought the two buildings in the lower right of that red outline were leased to state agencies? Or are they moving out as well?
    Are they also going to close the fitness center facilities? I believe it's now that anyone can get a membership there.

  24. Default Re: Chesapeake empire marches on

    I agree with some of the earlier posts. I see this area as ideal for some large multi-family developments with local retail.

  25. #1700

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by liirogue View Post
    I thought the two buildings in the lower right of that red outline were leased to state agencies? Or are they moving out as well?
    Service Oklahoma just spent a chunk of change to renovate building 4 plus renting spaces in Garage 2. I doubt they are leaving.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-09-2006, 09:05 AM
  2. Chesapeake buys more buildings; Triangle to benefit
    By Pete in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-28-2006, 11:51 AM
  3. Is Chesapeake Cannibalizing the Western Corridor?
    By BDP in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 04-25-2006, 10:17 PM
  4. Chesapeake co-founder stepping out
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-14-2006, 08:47 AM
  5. Chesapeake continues expansion
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-09-2004, 11:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO