When are they going to start construction?
Very exciting. Just hope that they can get the site cleaned up. Granted, putting a stadium on top sort of "covers" the mess without having to deal with it in the same way as you would if you were, say, put in a development that had to scoop out for a basement or something.
I'm crossing my fingers that they make it usable for things like football to host state games and marching contests!
That would be a great development for downtown and soccer fans in the area, but no talk of making it work for baseball too?
Chickasaw Bricktown Ballpark turns 26 years old this year, which is older than Paycom, and it's the third oldest facility in the PCL.
Kind of surprised not much has been said about maybe a more modern stadium for the OKC Baseball Club/Dodgers.
I liked the OKANA idea but it'll be really nice to see the Coop site get used for something, and so much the better if this jump starts the development on the rest of the site.
Gonna be a shame if the lingering remediation issues prevent any housing anywhere nearby.
Multipurpose stadiums are pretty terrible for watching or playing any sport. I don't think one has been built outside the high school level in years.
Age really isn't a factor in baseball facilities. Think Fenway and Wrigley. Even Dodger Stadium was built in the 1960's. There is an argument that old stadiums add to the fun and charm of the game.
Said it before and will say it again: pitch this to The Cordish Companies and let them develop this:
https://www.cordish.com/businesses/s...ored-districts
The details aren't adding up here, and that simply may because they haven't been made public. If that site does, in fact, require millions of dollars in environmental remediation, where is that money coming from and what's the plan to remediate it? The stadium proposal is for only 9 of the 34+ acres. Assuming a soccer stadium land-use doesn't require remediation, they should be fine for those 9 acres. But then what for the other 25, especially if the plan is to use it as "a catalyst" for housing?
I bet the city will chip in to help clean up those other 25 acres at some point in time.
Isn’t the same guy directing the stadium development the one that owns the team? The same guy that would directly benefit from his team playing in a higher level league and possibly even the MLS. Isn’t it the same guy that’s attempting to acquire and develop the adjoining land?
Who doesn’t budget for land acquisition on this size of development? Who in their right mind would think you don’t need funds to acquire the best possible location? If I were a businessman and owned the OKC Energy I would be very pleased with how this is proceeding.
I wouldn't call the current plan a true U either. It is what it is, a budget friendly stadium that just got a little boost in its budget. The great thing about U or partial U's is that they can easily be turned into O's in the future. Just look at Gaylord stadium. The USA softball Hall of Stadium is another facility that has been slowly been upgraded over the years.
I'm not 100% sure it will have shade structures, but that was shown in 'Option 2' and coincides with the increased budget.
They could easily get value-engineered out before the stadium is built. Long way to go with financing approvals (TIF and Omni funds), then final design, competitive bidding, etc.
They've always billed this as a stadium that could be expanded to host the MLS so I don't really think current MLS stadiums are a great comparison. It can always be enclosed if we got an MLS franchise. I don't think it's really worth allocating funds to part of the stadium that would almost always be empty absent an MLS franchise when they could be put to better use.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Bookmarks