I was referring to this post that uses OKC‘s own numbers to show that the city operates the arena at a loss. If you have data that shows otherwise I would be happy to reconsider my position.
So glad the vote is today and we can quit reading the same arguments over and over and over and over and over …..
To a degree you’re right here. But $100 million would have been an easier sell to a lot more folks. 10% sounds better than 5%.
There are people who are opposed to this that surprise me, people who support MAPS typically.
People like JoBeth would never support this ever under any circumstances. I am more concerned by reactions I am seeing from other people whom I would assume would easily understand the importance of this initiative to the city’s present and future status.
Today we have the opportunity to invest in ourselves once again. When this photo was taken in over 20 years ago you can see the bones of a city growing, the street realignment, the future home of Scissortail Park in the background just a collection of abandoned industrial buildings and vacant properties. The Crosstown Expressway still cutting through downtown acting as a physical and visual barrier to further development. Voters bought into a vision for what Oklahoma City could be if we came together and built big things. I already voted yes on Thursday, if you have not done so, please vote yes today. Not for the Thunder, not for concerts, but for us, for the future generations of Oklahoma City citizens who will look back just as we are now at this picture and say "WOW, I am so grateful they took a chance and believed they could accomplish big things."
A lot of the messaging on "the team will move" has been largely incorrect. Yes - the team would move. But under no circumstances would this ownership group be the ones moving them. It's simple, vote fails -> Ownership sells team -> Team moves.
There is still so much misinformation floating around. I'm seeing graphics on social media saying there will be a 6-year extension of the MAPS4 tax to raise $70M, and ANOTHER "new" sales tax to raise the other $780M. Whether you characterize it as an extension of the existing tax or a "new" tax to replace the expiring one, it is NOT both. I'm also seeing that $1200/resident figure thrown around as a fact without taking into account the sales tax paid by nonresidents at all. But the argument I see the most is that the mayor needs to go back to renegotiate and is purposefully giving us a bad deal. Even if you think this proposal hoses the people of OKC, why would the mayor WANT to stick his name and political legacy behind a bad deal if a better one were available? He has every incentive to want to be able to promote the best deal since he has personally advocated for heavily for the need for a new arena. There's only say many ways he can politely say we have no leverage and this is a "take it or leave it" deal without starting to sound insulting, but many people really don't seem to be picking up on that...
Excited to vote yes today and God willing someday getting to watch a game/concert in the new state of the art OKC arena.
What’s everyone final margin percentage prediction?
65-35 Yes
Does it have to be profitable to be an asset to the city? Is public transit a profit center? City parks?
No, but I want them because those are attributes of a modern, well developed, aspirational city. The arena is a public facility much like the downtown Metropolitan Library - it does not need to generate a profit to be considered a positive for the city. They all contribute to making OKC a desirable place to live, visit, and work.
I hope it passes - I no longer get to vote in OKC since I moved. But had this come up earlier this year, I would have been a solid yes.
62% Yes
38% No
This would be my hope, I think it will be slimmer than it should, 55/45ish, but I think it will pass.
I hope the mayor and the chamber are learning a lesson tho that their messaging ahead of things like this needs to be A LOT BETTER. MAKE THE CASE dummies, or your opponents will make it first.
Also, Chamber should have advised owners to chip in 10 points, hell could have even paid them back, still would have looked a hell of a lot better.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks