Widgets Magazine
Page 63 of 102 FirstFirst ... 135859606162636465666768 ... LastLast
Results 1,551 to 1,575 of 2536

Thread: University Town Center

  1. #1551

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    That sucks but is not all that surprising.
    The word "boondoggle" comes to mind

  2. Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Boss View Post
    I didn't want to sound harsh in my initial response but it strains believability that costs would go up 100% AND the arena shrinks by 20%. I'd like a lot more details than what has been told so far.
    I was being a bit facetious. We also have no clue the original build plan (that I can find online at least) or what this one includes. We would have to see those side by side to know the cost change.

    I'm in a construction adjacent industry and costs are still very high. People are still underestimating what materials and labor now costs post-pandemic. Not 100% more though.

  3. #1553

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Weather Museum hopes to make Norman the place for all things weather with world-class facility.
    The multimillion-dollar exhibit would be part of Norman's $1 billion entertainment district package announced this month.

    https://www.koco.com/article/oklahom...useum/45328670

  4. #1554

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Bowser214 View Post
    Weather Museum hopes to make Norman the place for all things weather with world-class facility.
    The multimillion-dollar exhibit would be part of Norman's $1 billion entertainment district package announced this month.

    https://www.koco.com/article/oklahom...useum/45328670
    I haven't seen anything about where this place is located now or if it even is a thing now. What kind of financial resources it currently has or what is the backing entity?

  5. #1555

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Boss View Post
    I haven't seen anything about where this place is located now or if it even is a thing now. What kind of financial resources it currently has or what is the backing entity?
    Yeah, I had to look it up, but it is currently directly east of the proposed development, east of Flood on the south side of Rock Creek in a nondescript building. I looked at their website and the cost to enter is $7 for adults and $3 for children. They are only open Friday, Saturday and Sunday, 10-4. You can get a family membership for $50... For comparison, Science Museum of Oklahoma is $20.95 for adults and $15.95 for children and a family of six is $210 per year.

  6. #1556

    Default Proposed Entertainment District

    https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html

    Agenda for tonight City Council meeting amended to include discussion on proposed entertainment district and financing same.

  7. #1557

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Boss View Post
    https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html

    Agenda for tonight City Council meeting amended to include discussion on proposed entertainment district and financing same.
    It should be noted that in Sept the public was told that 80% of the arena would be funded by private and University sources with Norman paying 20%.
    The staff report submitted tonight calls for a 60% funding by the city and 40% by private and University sources. Plus the city would also be paying for the infrastructure upgrades. This info is in the provided link.
    A classic boondoggle in the making.

  8. #1558

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Boss View Post
    It should be noted that in Sept the public was told that 80% of the arena would be funded by private and University sources with Norman paying 20%.
    this is not what was said in Sept ..

    80% of the entire plans 1 billion dollar cost would be privately funded ..

    The proposed location for the district is planned at Rock Creek Road and 24th Avenue Northwest. 80% of the plan's $1 billion cost will be covered through private funds, with the remaining 20% coming through public sources.

    https://www.oudaily.com/news/1-billi...95498c17f.html

  9. #1559

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    this is not what was said in Sept ..

    80% of the entire plans 1 billion dollar cost would be privately funded ..




    https://www.oudaily.com/news/1-billi...95498c17f.html
    That was September. This is 2 months later.
    https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html
    A staff report posted as part of the agenda for Tuesday evening read:

    “Under the proposal, a combination of University and private resources would combine to fund approximately 40% of the total arena construction costs, while the University would only use approximately 25% of the event dates. Team Norman has asked the City to consider funding the remainder of the construction costs as well as some additional infrastructure utilizing tax increment financing.”



    If this arena is constructed it would be the smallest seat wise in the SEC. This is what Norman is being asked to fund?

  10. #1560

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Boss View Post
    That was September. This is 2 months later.
    https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html
    A staff report posted as part of the agenda for Tuesday evening read:

    “Under the proposal, a combination of University and private resources would combine to fund approximately 40% of the total arena construction costs, while the University would only use approximately 25% of the event dates. Team Norman has asked the City to consider funding the remainder of the construction costs as well as some additional infrastructure utilizing tax increment financing.”



    If this arena is constructed it would be the smallest seat wise in the SEC. This is what Norman is being asked to fund?
    nothing changed

  11. #1561

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    nothing changed
    How did nothing change? Unless they were being intentionally vague with the costs of each element in the September meeting, and 80% of the total cost, while correct, is broken out amongst multiple items?

  12. #1562

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    How did nothing change? Unless they were being intentionally vague with the costs of each element in the September meeting, and 80% of the total cost, while correct, is broken out amongst multiple items?
    i mean i think they purposefully left it vague before... i think they are going to hit the 80% of the total overall development being university and private, but the arena is a big sunk cost that they won't be able to recoop the private investment on as quickly, so they are offing that more to the city.... so i wouldn't say bait and switch, but a purposeful misdirection to try and make it sound good to the citizens

  13. #1563

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    How did nothing change? Unless they were being intentionally vague with the costs of each element in the September meeting, and 80% of the total cost, while correct, is broken out amongst multiple items?
    it was allays presented as 80% private dollars of the total development ..
    80% of the plan's $1 billion cost will be covered through private funds
    i am suprised that the city only has to pay 60% or the arena costs .. i thought it would be more ..

  14. #1564

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Note that the university investment will at least be partly (and perhaps mostly) in the form of land contribution.

  15. #1565

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    i mean i think they purposefully left it vague before... i think they are going to hit the 80% of the total overall development being university and private, but the arena is a big sunk cost that they won't be able to recoop the private investment on as quickly, so they are offing that more to the city.... so i wouldn't say bait and switch, but a purposeful misdirection to try and make it sound good to the citizens
    Ironically, if 40% private was being thrown around for the new OKC arena, this board wouldn’t have anything to complain about.

  16. #1566

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    i mean i think they purposefully left it vague before... i think they are going to hit the 80% of the total overall development being university and private, but the arena is a big sunk cost that they won't be able to recoop the private investment on as quickly, so they are offing that more to the city.... so i wouldn't say bait and switch, but a purposeful misdirection to try and make it sound good to the citizens
    You are right. They added in a bunch of private ancillary development to make the non public cost percentages look better, even though there are no specifics, no timetables and no guarantees of the surrounding developments.

  17. #1567

    Default Re: University Town Center

    So I guess that no one is surprised that once again what was promised at UNP is not what is actually going to happen?
    Why do I feel like we've seen this movie before.....?

  18. #1568

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Martin View Post
    So I guess that no one is surprised that once again what was promised at UNP is not what is actually going to happen?
    Why do I feel like we've seen this movie before.....?
    but what was promised is what is happening... they just tried to word it in a way that made people think they were only talking about the arena, when they clearly the whole time have been saying the entire development.

  19. #1569

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by onthestrip View Post
    You are right. They added in a bunch of private ancillary development to make the non public cost percentages look better, even though there are no specifics, no timetables and no guarantees of the surrounding developments.
    This is exactly the point OU professor DR. Cynthia Rogers made when it was announced in Sept
    Read this fact based and the evidence on why this is a bad deal for Norman.
    Remember all the promises made to get UNP that never materialized, such as the lifestyle center.

    https://www.normantranscript.com/opi...b819eab87.html

  20. #1570

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    but what was promised is what is happening... they just tried to word it in a way that made people think they were only talking about the arena, when they clearly the whole time have been saying the entire development.
    Where is the lifestyle center the OU Foundation promised for UNP years ago?⁸

  21. #1571

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Smoke and mirrors, smoke and mirrors. Can we trust those involved if they feel the need to try to deceive the public in the initial proposal announcement?
    I'll leave this here and will withhold my skepticism going forward and hope that I'm wrong a few years from now.

  22. Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    Ironically, if 40% private was being thrown around for the new OKC arena, this board wouldn’t have anything to complain about.
    Oh, they'd find something.......

  23. #1573

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    it was allays presented as 80% private dollars of the total development ..

    i am suprised that the city only has to pay 60% or the arena costs .. i thought it would be more ..
    That still sucks we’ll have the seat count if true like really

  24. #1574

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Martin View Post
    Smoke and mirrors, smoke and mirrors. Can we trust those involved if they feel the need to try to deceive the public in the initial proposal announcement?
    I'll leave this here and will withhold my skepticism going forward and hope that I'm wrong a few years from now.
    there were no smoke and mirrors ..

    if someone didn't understand that this was the proposed deal they have a reding comprehension problem or where/are being intentionally uninformed

  25. #1575

    Default Re: University Town Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Martin View Post
    So I guess that no one is surprised that once again what was promised at UNP is not what is actually going to happen?
    Why do I feel like we've seen this movie before.....?
    this was what was announced and promised ..

    if you don't understand that that is a you problem

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 50 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 50 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. North Park Mall
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-15-2008, 11:08 PM
  2. University North Park Updates
    By dismayed in forum Suburban & Other OK Communities
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-26-2008, 06:48 PM
  3. Couch Park update!
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-03-2007, 09:23 AM
  4. Construction to begin on Stiles Park monument
    By Luke in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-25-2004, 12:56 AM
  5. OKC opens new park in 20 years
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-01-2004, 03:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO