I was being a bit facetious. We also have no clue the original build plan (that I can find online at least) or what this one includes. We would have to see those side by side to know the cost change.
I'm in a construction adjacent industry and costs are still very high. People are still underestimating what materials and labor now costs post-pandemic. Not 100% more though.
Weather Museum hopes to make Norman the place for all things weather with world-class facility.
The multimillion-dollar exhibit would be part of Norman's $1 billion entertainment district package announced this month.
https://www.koco.com/article/oklahom...useum/45328670
Yeah, I had to look it up, but it is currently directly east of the proposed development, east of Flood on the south side of Rock Creek in a nondescript building. I looked at their website and the cost to enter is $7 for adults and $3 for children. They are only open Friday, Saturday and Sunday, 10-4. You can get a family membership for $50... For comparison, Science Museum of Oklahoma is $20.95 for adults and $15.95 for children and a family of six is $210 per year.
https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html
Agenda for tonight City Council meeting amended to include discussion on proposed entertainment district and financing same.
It should be noted that in Sept the public was told that 80% of the arena would be funded by private and University sources with Norman paying 20%.
The staff report submitted tonight calls for a 60% funding by the city and 40% by private and University sources. Plus the city would also be paying for the infrastructure upgrades. This info is in the provided link.
A classic boondoggle in the making.
this is not what was said in Sept ..
80% of the entire plans 1 billion dollar cost would be privately funded ..
The proposed location for the district is planned at Rock Creek Road and 24th Avenue Northwest. 80% of the plan's $1 billion cost will be covered through private funds, with the remaining 20% coming through public sources.
https://www.oudaily.com/news/1-billi...95498c17f.html
That was September. This is 2 months later.
https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html
A staff report posted as part of the agenda for Tuesday evening read:
“Under the proposal, a combination of University and private resources would combine to fund approximately 40% of the total arena construction costs, while the University would only use approximately 25% of the event dates. Team Norman has asked the City to consider funding the remainder of the construction costs as well as some additional infrastructure utilizing tax increment financing.”
If this arena is constructed it would be the smallest seat wise in the SEC. This is what Norman is being asked to fund?
i mean i think they purposefully left it vague before... i think they are going to hit the 80% of the total overall development being university and private, but the arena is a big sunk cost that they won't be able to recoop the private investment on as quickly, so they are offing that more to the city.... so i wouldn't say bait and switch, but a purposeful misdirection to try and make it sound good to the citizens
Note that the university investment will at least be partly (and perhaps mostly) in the form of land contribution.
So I guess that no one is surprised that once again what was promised at UNP is not what is actually going to happen?
Why do I feel like we've seen this movie before.....?
This is exactly the point OU professor DR. Cynthia Rogers made when it was announced in Sept
Read this fact based and the evidence on why this is a bad deal for Norman.
Remember all the promises made to get UNP that never materialized, such as the lifestyle center.
https://www.normantranscript.com/opi...b819eab87.html
Smoke and mirrors, smoke and mirrors. Can we trust those involved if they feel the need to try to deceive the public in the initial proposal announcement?
I'll leave this here and will withhold my skepticism going forward and hope that I'm wrong a few years from now.
There are currently 39 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 39 guests)
Bookmarks