a recap for those that don't want to scroll
6 year maps extension 28-34 estimated to raise 891 million dollars
OKC will borrow the money to be able to build right aways
the team owners will donate 75 mil to the City owned and operated Arena
the Team will sign a 25 year lease to be the anchor tenant (something like 2028-2053) (who knows what the NBA and arena landscape will be in 2053
a recap for those that don't want to scroll
6 year maps extension 28-34 estimated to raise 891 million dollars
OKC will borrow the money to be able to build right aways
the team owners will donate 75 mil to the City owned and operated Arena
the Team will sign a 25 year lease to be the anchor tenant (something like 2028-2053) (who knows what the NBA and arena landscape will be in 2053
So it would effectively be the next MAPS project? Not entirely sure how I feel about that given it locks us out of other MAPS style developments for that duration but it would be a good way to do it that doesn't raise local taxes past the current level.
Realistically what would be the next steps if this doesn’t pass? I think it will pass, but still
MAPS is supposed to be for money-making lifestyle venues. See the baseball stadium and barebones Ford Center. That is what this is. It is MAPS at its core. And it doesn't raise taxes, which is a plus for me.
The arena would be a major catalyst for development around it downtown. I would at least hope the city has had talks with developers about potential plans for that area. Maybe nothing concrete, but gauged interest in the surrounding area in terms of potential developments.
Oh, absolutely. Try to build an exact copy of AT&T Stadium (Dallas Cowboys) today and it's gotta be about 2.5 billion, you'd think.
And there's a lot of other factors there too, as you mentioned.
But yeah, you nailed it, my point was, look how FAR this city has come in 20 or 30 years. Or like you said, just since Hurricane Katrina/Hornets. We're likely to easily pass the upcoming bill that will see us build a friggin ONE BILLION dollar NBA venue. Just incredible and it makes me so excited for the city going forward.
And again, I'd love for them to see the success of this and maybe add a little more to the Maps 4 Stadium. Give us a better shot at acquiring an MLS or XFL team. But that's a different discussion.
The point of the survey is to make sure the current plan is going to pass.
If the survey comes back negative (unlikely), they'll use the feedback to recalibrate and then do another survey until they are almost completely sure it will pass.
They won't put something to a formal vote until they are extremely confident it will sail through with a good cushion.
2 things here though.
1) it's LA. They absolutely have to keep up with the Jones' there, with anything built.
2) isn't Steve Balmer 100% paying for this himself? Mans worth billions and billions by himself. So he's basically building his own fantasy arena. We just don't have that luxury.
Even still, I bet ours will be very very similarly nice.
So Kaiser can build a huge, massive park in Tulsa costing nothing for the city, but when it comes to an arena in OKC (which would help him in the long run, financially), he is super frugal and fiscally conservative? Got it.
Having sports logo design in my past I was underwhelmed at the first designs for the Thunder (great colors but awful fonts). I was under the impression at the time that it would be a year or three of that then a solid logo rebrand with better fonts, graphics, and Rumble. Still waiting….
I think Dob was conflating updating colors/marks with a full renaming (several others seem to be going the same direction). You're correct; NBA teams fairly regularly change logos and other marks, and often even change team colors. He is also correct, however, that teams almost never change team name without extenuating circumstances (relocation or in the case of NOLA/Charlotte a combination of relocation, expansion and ownership baggage).
The Thunder has established and maintain tremendous brand/organizational respect within the league and beyond. Why in the world would they change the name? The answer is: they won't. Not as long as the team is in OKC, anyway. Logo and color updates will almost certainly happen at some point, not specifically because of random peoples' take on their existing marks, but because every team occasionally does so.
It does indeed make sense that such an update might happen when a new arena opens. There is a known tendency for teams to get hot and for fans to become more engaged, at least temporarily, when a new building opens. See: Rams, Mariners, Seahawks and others. I can't imagine the updates happening too far in advance of a planned building opening, so I would guess we will have the same colors and marks for at least the next 4-5 seasons.
I really think the only major updates that need to happen is with the logo and the jerseys. IMO, the Blue/Orange color scheme is good and relatively unique. It's just that from that color scheme, they managed to come up with the most generic logo and jerseys imaginable.
^
Yes, I think everyone likes the color scheme.
The logos and the font on the jerseys look like something from a middle schooler.
You guys should look up user /u/tgchompy on the Thunder subreddit. He was designing rebranded jerseys for some of the better Ws near the end of last season. Really fun to look at for ideas.
It is crazy how the Thunder logo doesn't even lean into the storm theme with lightning bolts. Definitely overdue for new logo and jerseys. Plus we need Loves to have their patch remove the god awful yellow and at least pretend to care about the jersey's look.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Bookmarks