Mayor Holt is going to talk about the arena tomorrow morning on the KATT. Not that he'll say anything we don't already know.
Oklahoma City IMO could build something comparable to Little Caesar's Arena (Detroit) with 1,500 less seats (around 18,500) and more space for an outside exterior balcony and amenities on the PSM site in the $750 million-$800 million range.
Do feasibility study on reviving the All College Tournament (NCAA basketball) Holiday Tournament which would benefit downtown hotels and Bricktown Entertainment District--get OU and/or OSU to commit to the event.Seats can be red, orange, blue or teal--any of these seat colors or combinations will do.
Get a major tourists attraction downtown like a multi-million dollar Zoo Aquarium.
Utilizing a new arena and Paycom Center could bring back the FFA 10,000 member attendees convention to OKC until a decision is made on the Paycom Arena.
^ ^ ^ This could lead to construction of more 'quality' downtown hotels with more potential to attract level II, III type conventions.
More fan engagement love the idea.
We passed the first MAPS initiative in 1993; we took the process underground and allowed those involved to get their ideas together before being presented to the public. Mayor Ron Norick is who we all credit with getting the first MAPS passed and getting our city to place more emphasis on 'quality of life' aspects of our city floated the Metropolitan Area Projects (MAPS) that saved aging infrastructure (City owned buildings, school buildings, a river and improvements of overall quality of life).
Let's get the 'whole' city council involved with periodic reports without jeopardizing the integrity of the project. Important that all members agree to keep this process behind the scenes and allow our mayor (spokesperson) to speak out about the process.
I know there are many things our city needs to address (all ideas need to be evaluated); however, you can only focus on a few at a time.
On the arena development, we don't need a true hard core figure until determine what will be needed for a new arena addressing NBA, major concerts and events. We know the range will be somewhere in the $600 million - $1 billion range for a city of our size.
Small NBA markets under 2 million MSA population:]
40. Milwaukee 1,559,792 - Fiserv Forum, $524 million (arena portion) - 714,000 sq ft
42. Oklahoma City 1,459,380 - Paycom Center, $89. 2 million - 586,000 sq ft (opened 2002)
44. Memphis 1,332,305 - Fedex Forum, $250 million - 805,850 ft (opened 2004)
46. Salt Lake City 1,266,191 - Delta Center, $93 million - 743,000 sq ft (opened 1991)
47. New Orleans 1,246,176 - Smoothie King Center, $114 million - 571,000 sq ft (opened 1999)
The Thunder ownership will make a significant contribution; we won't know that until we determine specification and outcomes.
Just want to mention what IMO is a sense of civic pride in our Thunder ownership.
If this was about 'money' they could have easily put the franchise up for sale and distributed more than $1.875 billion - $2 billion (Forbes 2023 NBA team evaluations - OKC #24) among themselves based on their investments.
Source: https://www.forbes.com/nba-valuations/list/#tabverall
.
Why do you think ownership will pay a dime of the new arena?
I think as a city we just have to decide do we want to keep a professional sports team knowing that every 20 years it'll require the equiv of half a billion dollars of investment. Is that a worthy investment for the city or should we spend those funds somewhere else?
I think you are giving them too much credit. These guys aren't normal folks that need to sell a house to buy another one. And they certainly don't need to sell down their equity position in anything to fund their lifestyle or pay for a night out at Ruth's Chris. If you're that wealthy, you just borrow against your equity position in the team. No sense in paying capital gains taxes (and i'm assuming a 1031 exchange is not available for sports ball team divestitures), especially if you're sitting on an asset which should continue to appreciate substantially in the next decade.
And, all of them own businesses that employ folks in the OKC area. Having the Thunder in OKC helps those businesses recruit talent and, arguably, helps those businesses make more money than they would otherwise. At a minimum, those businesses get some sort of benefit if the Thunder are located in OKC.
No, you don’t really need to give billionaires credit or praise them for being selfless citizens for continuing to hold on to an asset that will continue to increase in value, especially when they’re about to strongarm the city into outlaying a massive amount of money for a new arena.
The rumored number is $70 million vs. approximately a $1 billion total cost.
'Significant' is a highly subjective term.
I was thinking 20% minimum to be considered significant
I don't know the number for sure, but $70 million has been tossed around for about a year.
I think Holt is a good mayor, but he is 1000% behind this deal and I wouldn't expect him to be anything near objective when it comes to his phrasing. He's been in full campaign mode for this for well over a year.
We are talking about the financial contribution of the Thunder ownership, which Holt has described as 'significant'.
Keep in mind there will almost certainly be a non-arena aspect to this development (restaurants and other types of entertainment) and their money may be put towards that while also participating in associated profits. That was the plan with the proposed Thunder Alley south of Paycom and I expect they will take that concept and just enlarge it.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Bookmarks