"Because Title IX does not contain limiting language as does Title VI, the courts have concluded that Title IX reaches employment discrimination in the educational programs or activities of recipients without limitation."
https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ix...Discrimination
So from the doj website. Yes, you are wrong, title IX discrimination applies to employees as well, and thus the school would not be able to collectively bargain with a union that was only made up of football players. I mean we can keep going back and forth, but I'm going to take the doj website over your opinions on the matter.
i mean... i guess you are right. i only know that the attempts to create a union so far have all failed because the NRLB says they don't have jurisdiction and it's a title ix issue for jurisdiction. [SARCASM] so, guess myself, the NRLB, the NCAA, universities, and the DOJ are all in the dark, and you are the only one who actually knows what is happening. which of course you have proven with all of your comments of proof to back it up. [/SARCASM]
And remember. I haven't said that a union will be formed, infact I don't think that athletes want to be employees, and so I don't think unions are even an option. I'm just saying yet again that your scenario that they will make a union and that it was "undeniable" was actually pretty easy to deny, since the schools and NCAA couldnt legally bargain with said hypothetical union.
and it failed. because the NRLB ruled that it didn't have jurisdiction over educational institutions. that is why it failed at northwestern back in 2014-15, and what people seemed to miss in the 2022 NRLB statement in california. that they felt that student athletes are mistreated, but that they don't have the jurisdiction for further ruling. so now, it really doesn't look like that is where it is headed anytime soon.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks