I hope they’ll still keep the streets open and allow outdoor drinking in the district on gamedays. I think that’s what makes the area unique on gamedays compared to other college towns (or most places, generally). I don’t make it over there as much as I used to, but it’s nice to be able to buy a beer from a merchant without having to go into a crowded establishment and wait for service, etc. (While it used to be nice to take that beer wherever I pleased, I understand the modernization laws made it more difficult after the 3.2 distinction was removed.). I’ve been surprised at how much policing other cities and schools regarding open container. When I was at a tailgate in Columbus, I was told we had to put our beer in a red cup and keep it at the tailgate. While not much of an inconvenience, I’m glad Norman is lax on those issues as a policy.
If there were to be massive redevelopment, I'm sure it would be a phased approach so the entire district wouldn't be out of commission at the same time.
Maybe they can just hire the people doing OAK and have it all done in 3 weeks.
Agree all with this. Raised in Norman and I have spent many many days and nights on campus corner and half of the buildings seem like they are held up by the numerous layers of paint on the interior and exterior walls. Also, I think some of the challenge in blending campus corner into main street is the large # of churches in-between. Kinda hard to redevelop those.
Al Eschbach recently said on his show that he's hearing the same thing: Most of Campus Corner will be leveled and replaced with 6-story buildings; retail on the ground floor and apartments above and structured parking.
Said the University really wants it to happen and it's part of the big push for the SEC.
Also said he's hearing it will start in the next couple of years.
I've still yet to post the photos I took of every building in that area and frankly, there isn't much there worth saving. Yes, the collective adds up to a fun place but if you start looking at the buildings, very, very few are anything special.
I'll still post the photos and the numbered map that correlates.
It was hard but I've gotten on board with a redo of Campus Corner. I just wish for 2 things. The designers understand that keeping some feel of nostalgia is important to those of us that spent lots of time there. And the designers give LOTS of consideration to the part of campus across the street which has such old and beautiful buildings.
Dickson st in Fayetteville has changed over the 20 years we lived/traveled there and it has gone from a worn down campus corner to a beautiful area. I hope the developers for ours takes a look over there. A mix of old and new works well for them, it can for us.
You should try and talk to Rainey Powell (Harold's). Owns and offices at the Boomer. He can tell you what's going on. This large scale real estate acquisition effort has been going on for some time.
I'm all for a redevelopment of campus corner but in my perfect world, the developers will come up with a way to preserve the more unique building facades while building apartments set-back 10 feet or so from those facades.
I loved Campus Corner in my time in Norman, but it’s kind of sad seeing all of those pics and 90% of the buildings are identical to 20 years ago (with the exception of some minor work and paint). I went to Athens, GA earlier this year and was shocked at the difference. There were cranes, construction and new developments going up all around campus. It’s nearly identical population to Norman, but half the area. It would be a pretty sweet college to go to, in all honesty.
Heard a rumor that OU might use its power of eminent domain to take some of the individually-owned buildings on Campus Corner. Who knew they had that power?
OU doesn't have the power of eminent domain; that is only for local (like the City of Norman), state or federal governments.
Also, it's very rare (and legally questionable) for the government to forcibly take private property and then have it used for private development. Generally speaking, the new use has to be a public one.
I am pretty sure that OU does have ED ability
and this https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news...g/62145813007/
backs it up ..
Kelo v. City of New London held that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the takings clause of the 5th amendment. The reason being that the use of eminent domain would cause the community to enjoy the general benefit of economic growth and thus qualified as a "public use."
Last edited by cinnamonjock; 07-28-2023 at 03:27 PM. Reason: clarity
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks