I saw that and chalked it up to an error. How are they going to do that? Simply restripe the freeway? Otherwise there is no way they can modernize that stretch for the budget they have on this project. I knew it was being widened from around the Douglass BLVD interchange to I-240 but not to Town Center. I looked at all the plans and didn’t see anything about this section. I will now be emailing ODOT about this.
The preliminary Douglas interchange plans have the widening start at industrial Blvd and there is another project that was approved at the same time that covers from Douglas Interchange to I-240. I think the work zone technically starts at Town Center, but no widening is on the plans for that area.
Well we will find out soon enough. They already started dozing at the Douglas junction.
Here's my crystal ball to help tell you if they do the 2000 ft section. If they remove the railway bridge and Arnold St bridge right there at the curve near Midwest Blvd, then the widening is happening. If they don't, then that's going to come later. Because I can't envision any way they can squeeze 6 lanes under those two bridges. They would have to have people driving on the actual shoulder with re-stripping where you could reach out and touch the bridge support otherwise. And since neither of those bridges serve any purpose any longer, it also removes the need for I-40 to even be below grade. They're taking out Engle, which i had mixed up with Industrial because i couldn't think of Engle at all since its been closed for decades.
So the question remains on Industrial too. It's similarly built and would probably need to be replaced to make room for 6 lanes. But it's just a traditional dip, not a whole massive thing like at the curve.
Removing that need to go below grade may make the whole thing easier to do too.
I should also point out that they're doing re-paving (again) on this area of 40. It gets beat up pretty hard so it needs it about every 5-7 years anyway. So I dont know that it precludes the possibility of a pending widening, but with the way ODOT works, they rarely put any money in to something if they plan on ripping it up soon. Maybe some grant money was used? I dont know. If I had to guess, I'd say the SPUI and the widening will be on different timelines with widening not even being considered until after the SPUI is done. And again, widening will only happen if they remove those bridges.
Well the story gets even more muddy folks. The graded off the shoulder for the path all the way up to Anderson. And they had Anderson closed under I-40 as well for some weird reason (with a backhoe on the bridge).
So much of this doesn't line up in my brain. Why scrape the shoulders if you weren't planning on doing the 6 land work? But why would you not grade the INSIDE instead of the outside? That would mean tearing out the wire barrier, which i did not see that they had done. Plus those bridges are still there.
Wonder when they're supposed to install the streetlights on the stretch they just rebuilt? Been like that for months now
I noticed that last time i drove down I-40. Only a couple of them were installed. They also never finished painting the Sooner Rd bridge.
I also figured out why Anderson was closed that weekend. They ripped out the sides (middle) of both bridges. Looks like they are prepping to "bridge the gap" (hahaha) to connect the two bridges to make the 6 lanes for that one. The jack hammered out the divider, the side supports, the concrete below/etc. That was short-sighted since OKC just spend a bunch of money trying to turn that section of Anderson into 4 lanes, but it has to squeeze down to 2 to fit under the bridge. Seems sort of silly to me, but whatever. Save a buck here to kick that can down the line.
Just did some sleuthing through the plans and it looks like actually will be extending the I-40 bridges to accommodate 4 lanes (+ a center turn lane) on Anderson. I agree with your sentiment on ODOT's short-sightedness though. That's how i feel about some of the more recent bridge replacements on I-35 between OKC and Texas. The N & S bound bridges over the Wa****a river just north of Pauls Valley come to mind. Crazy that they didn't build those wide enough to accommodate a future 3rd lane in both directions. Seems like ODOT is starting to head that direction though on current and future bridge replacements.
I don't think their trying to 'bridge the gap'. For whatever reason, they determined it made more sense to build 50 percent of a new bridge between those two old bridges and than build the other 50 percent after shifting traffic to new bridge. They demolished the retaining wall and breakdown lane to make more room.
ODOT is shortsighted, but I don't think they are that shortsighted to only enough room for two lanes for Anderson. Especially those two bridges are really two old to just upgrade like that.
Yeah, that would for sure be the best case scenario. Especially since they'd be able to keep at least 1 lane open in each direction without having to divert one lane to the opposite direction of travel. I believe the North & South spans over the Whashi-ta are too far apart for that to be a realistic option though. Best i can tell from google earth the Washi-ta bridges are roughly 90' apart whereas the KPT were only 35'.
Last edited by OKC B-Man; 06-02-2023 at 09:16 AM. Reason: typo
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks