Yeah, but that's actually a 30% difference in growth rate and OKC's base is about 35% higher to begin with.
So, even if the growth rate was the same, it would still mean a bigger gross increase in OKC.
I'm not saying it's a big deal, but it's not a totally insignificant difference. It does suggest that more (most) of the state's overall growth is in the OKC MSA and I think that's all anyone was pointing out.
Bookmarks