Re: OKANA Resort & Indoor Waterpark
the point is two fold; 1) we need to further densify downtown rather than keep branching out having fields inbetween major anchors and 2) OKC's government seems to have a system of back-room good ole boy deals that neglects public input despite the "public reviews" that are offered. Both of these issues are why OKC has not reach critical mass and we likely never will as long as we dont address these 2 issues. MAPS has been successful largely because OKC has been so lacking compared to peer major cities; just getting what we got made the city relevent. But it could have been done better and we should have better, more connected development yet special interests seem to always creep in and as was mentioned, long before the council approval which serves as a rubber stamp.
It'd be awesome if someone could really do some investigative journalism here, not to point fingers or anything but to improve the process and hold officials accountable. If they say they promote transparancy then someone should mention when things arent; which is nearly every major development. Luckily, there doesn't appear to be much corruptions (other than the fairgrounds imo) but the city should take public input more than just a baked survey. I have been calling for master plans for years and still haven't really seen one other than the Core-2-Shore plan which came from the former mayor Cornett.
Can anyone reach out to Holt and the crew? I'd hate to see MAPS suffer long term because of this.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks