I consider Oklahoma part of the Southwest but I like this description here which I find more accurate:
“ Sorting through thousands of place names in hundreds of cities, he compiled a series of maps that showed how people identified their regions. Some of the regions were predictable: Boston businesses used a lot of terms like New England and Northeastern in their names or descriptions. “Southern” was a dominant term in phone books in Mississippi, Louisiana, Georgia, etc. But, looking at Zelinksy’s maps today, it is Oklahoma that shows the biggest regional confusion. Strangely, Zelinsky never commented on this fact. He noted that some places, like western Pennsylvania, were kind of stuck between Northeastern and Midwestern, but it was Oklahoma that had the greatest amount of regional identities. Five of the twelve vernacular identities that Zelinsky came up with converged on Oklahoma. For phone books in the very southeastern part of the state, Oklahoma was southern. In the panhandle, it was the “West.” Along the Kansas border, it was the Midwest. From Oklahoma City to the west, it was the “southwest.”
https://thislandpress.com/2012/11/14...e-is-oklahoma/
Really where I genuinely get confused is what category OKC falls in. I really get can SW vibes in certain areas, NW OKC feeling like I could be in Denver, and eastern suburbs feeling like the south or rust belt. It’s actually pretty cool, IMO.
Bookmarks