data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7391d/7391d462a4d422628be24131959d1f1ff0c4bf48" alt="Quote"
Originally Posted by
jn1780
Oh yeah, it work well for them in Europe. They are enjoying their no lockdown right now.................
Italy was the second country hit hard initially, locked down hard and long, wore masks all summer, now approaching where they were previously.
I am not arguing against the effectiveness of masks, but lets stop with the simplistic logic and realize there are a lot of variables at play. On the data science side of things, it seems pretty clear the declines in the south this summer was due to it being the summer lull. They were able to get just enough herd immunity to stop the exponentially growth. Masks may have helped, but certainly not enough to stop the resumption of exponentially growth when the temperatures went down again.
I haven't seen any real world 'ah ha' example where masks have prevented at least one exponentially explosion. The best we can say is that they slow growth. Even that is hard to quantify, because a lot of places that saw declines had a huge spike beforehand. So which was it: the masks or a temporary lull due to a combination of herd immunity/summer temps? We probably won't have a good mask effectiveness number until comparing everyone after the pandemic is over.
We do have low death rates in Japan, but their cleaner in everything they do life not just masks.
Also, we are simplistic in our thinking over here in the western world, we are lazy in all our other mitigation efforts and take more risks just because we wear masks thus cancelling out the benefits. If one motor cycle rider wears a helmet everyday of the week, but another doesn't but only rides one day of the month who has the greater risk of dying?
Bookmarks