Indian River County to vote on Piper on Oct. 9
By HENRY A. STEPHENS
henry.stephens@scripps.com
July 11, 2007
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — Voters will get to decide Oct. 9 whether the county should issue $40 million in bonds as part of an incentive package to convince Piper Aircraft Inc. to stay in Vero Beach.
In a 5-0 vote Tuesday, county commissioners agreed to that date for a referendum, even though Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem said she would only need two months to arrange a special election.
The referendum comes as Piper is considering whether to keep its current plant in Vero Beach and build a new facility here for the PiperJet — a new, light jet — or move to Albuquerque, N.M., or Oklahoma City. The company recently rejected bids from Columbia, S.C., and Tallahassee.
At stake are the aircraft maker's 1,050 existing jobs and about 500 people who would be hired to manufacture the PiperJet.
Late last month, both the Vero Beach City Council and the Indian River County Commission voted unanimously in favor of a $76.5 million package of incentives to keep the company flying here. The bulk of the package would be $40 million from the city and county to buy the existing facilities at $23 million and build the jet plant at $17 million.
The city and county would then lease the facility back to Piper for eight years before charging rent.
The bonds would be repaid by property taxes for 30 years, if voters agree. County Administrator Joe Baird said the county needs voter approval because the Legislature's mandate for tax cuts doesn't leave room for the project in the regular budget.
At one point Tuesday, Indian River Shores retiree Ted Robinson chastised the commission for working with Vero Beach and the Chamber of Commerce to help Piper "for reasons not in the overall public interest." He said the city-county incentive would only help people connected to Piper.
Vero Beach resident Dennis Drake said the county should join in the Piper offer, for instance, by selling off property and giving the proceeds toward the project.
"If the county wants Piper here, you'd better look in your own closet and clean that out before you come to me," he said.
Vero Beach resident Jens Tripson said he isn't connected to the company, but said Piper helps the county by being a "big part of the economy," adding the housing slump has shown development can't carry it.
After the meeting, Baird said the referendum would authorize — but not require — the county to sell the bonds.
"The bonds would not be issued without a firm deal with Piper and a signed agreement they won't leave," he said.
So far, however, chamber Executive Director Penny Chandler said Piper hasn't given any guarantee it would stay if the referendum passes. Commissioner Joe Flescher compared that to a gamble.
"We're asking voters to go to the polls without proof of any benefit," he said. "Either way, it's a gamble with $100,000 to $120,000 on a hope."
And that hope is to keep the company's annual $518 million impact on the local economy, Chandler said.
"Piper wouldn't be spending millions of dollars to have their consulting firm draw up paperwork...if they thought they were simply going to be staying here," she said.
There is one thing for sure, Commissioner Wesley Davis noted.
"We're positive that if we don't do this, we are going to lose those jobs," he said.
Bookmarks