![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
soonerguru
Relax man.
1. I said it's a THEORY.
2. You're a Tulsan; you should understand. Tulsa World ultimately is just as cheerleady for Tulsa as the Oklahoman is at times for OKC.
3. Are you suggesting that the population trends from 2017 radically shifted in 2018? If so, why? I see no reason to indicate that they would.
To repeat, in 2017, OKC population increased (somewhat marginally). Tulsa's held pat (no increase in migration but a tiny net gain based on births and deaths). And the rural areas of Oklahoma continued to depopulate.
So, if you notice, the subject of this multiyear thread is OKC Population Growth. Not Oklahoma population growth. Most of us here would be running for the exits if we were not in one of the two metro areas. The state of the state is as bad as it has been in my lifetime.
As most people on this forum, I want OKC population growth figures. The Tulsa World provided no detail in that area for whatever reason. I think you would agree that it's likely OKC continued its marginal population growth while Tulsa held even and the rest of the state lost people. I'm basing this on recent history not the whims of a Tulsa World editor.
Bookmarks