So...it is the optometrists who are behind the original protectionist law, not Wal-Mart. Places like Wal-Mart are the ones intentionally excluded by the current law. The ballot is worded as if it is advocating on behalf of optometrists; "Right of Optometrists and Opticians to Practice in Retail Establishments Initiative," but it is actually OPPOSED by the Oklahoma Association of Optometric Physicians. The supporters include:
- Oklahomans for Consumer Freedom
- Wal-Mart
- Oklahoma Retail Merchants Association
Here is the listing on Ballotpedia that breaks it all down:
https://ballotpedia.org/Oklahoma_Sta...tiative_(2018)
And, such as often happens in pronouncements on this board about Oklahoma's supposed outlier behavior, this issue is in no way exclusive to Oklahoma:
https://www.reviewofoptometry.com/ar...re-exams-44841
https://www.sfgate.com/health/articl...ts-4291872.php
Bookmarks