I wonder if it was a combination of cost for another flyover ramp and property/right-of-way issues.
They're doing the LHP ramps this year and next year. I would imagine the broadway extension ramp can't be justified based upon traffic demand for the cost for building a flyover. Certainly more daily commuters that would use the LHP ramps than a SB to EB ramp at broadway and kilpatrick.
Are you talking about an EB ramp AND a WB ramp onto the turnpike from SB 74...and....a NB ramp onto 74 from WB turnpike...and....a WB ramp onto the turnpike from NB 74...and...a NB ramp and a SB ramp onto 74 from EB turnpike?
Things that should have been done when they built that intersection...those are actually going to get built?
Yes they are going to build direct connect ramps.. FY18-19
https://www.pikepass.com/pdf/Project...s%20Update.pdf
I hear ya, but I'm sure the traffic demand at the point of construction couldn't justify the extra cost of building all the flyovers.
If i were a betting man i would say these next two projects will add at least two flyovers. The first one will almost certainly be NB LHP to WB Turnpike (although a question of toll collection comes into play). The second one isn't as obvious...could be SB LHP to EB Turnpike (easy toll interaction), EB Turnpike to SB LHP, or even WB Turnpike to NB LHP (although this one could have some serious roadway design challenges).
If this interchange (or any interchange) would be designed for all ramp locations, booth locations, easement clearances, ect., and then it was decided not to build them at that time; it would be much easier to build them at a later date then to build all new ramps from scratch....no such challenges. Why is that such a hard thing to do? (the planning for future part)
Here is the design for I-40/Frisco Rd. interchange in Yukon.
https://www.ok.gov/odot/Programs_and.../20170613.html
Looks like Lindsey Street bridge is opening.
https://www.ok.gov/triton/modules/ne...ticle_id=34197
Wonder if we start losing contributing Fed Funds?
Anyone know what is happening to the 23rd St. bridge over I-44?
Industry: ODOT’s cuts to projects are offensive, will hurt economy
By: Brian Brus The Journal Record October 2, 2017
OKLAHOMA CITY – Oklahoma Department of Transportation officials cut back on dozens of road and bridge projects in their eight-year plan in response to the Legislature’s handling of the state budget Monday.
The Transportation Commission voted to approve a rebalanced plan for projects for fiscal years 2018-2025, for removing items for the first time since 2003. Overall, 40 construction projects worth about $204 million were cut from the calendar and 40 percent of all programmed projects were delayed at least one year, including 65 that were scheduled for bidding this year. Of the remaining projects, several have been significantly reduced in scope in order to stretch available funding, spokeswoman Brenda Perry said.
ODOT officials expressed frustration for being forced to make the adjustments in response to $840 million in cumulative state funding reductions over the last seven years. The private sector was blunter.
“Here’s why it’s frustrating: Roads and bridges are the most commonly used core function of government in the state,” said Bobby Stem, president of the Association of Oklahoma General Contractors, which represents the industry behind most roadwork. “This is the only agency with an eight-year finance plan, with numbers rather than words. They’re not political. These projects are directed by accident and fatality reports.
“So you have the most accountable and transparent agency … constantly being used to shore up the rest of state government,” he said. “When you couple all of those aspects together, you find the Legislature’s actions to be highly offensive.”
Stem said his group represents up to 30,000 people with jobs in the road construction and repair industry, including insurance and financial bonds professionals, sod producers and engineers. The Legislature’s budget is not only hurting infrastructure, he said, but cutting in the economy as well.
The commission is the final step in a project-selection process that involves ODOT field division engineers and other staff members identifying critical needs in balance with state and federal funding. The plan is updated each year to reflect completions, delays, changes in costs and revenue projections. Funding comes from state income tax collections and state motor fuel tax appropriations, as well as the federal Highway Trust Fund.
Examples of scheduled projects that have been removed from the updated plan include realignment of the U.S. Highway 70 near Madill and $32 million for the replacement of U.S. Highway 60 bridges in Ottawa County. The reconstruction of U.S. Highway 75 along the eastern leg of the Inner Dispersal Loop in downtown Tulsa will be delayed two years; Interstate 40 interchange construction and widening at Douglas Boulevard in Midwest City will be delayed five years.
OkDOT will review the service roads in Edmond from 2nd. St. to Memorial and possibly propose changes which includes conversion to one way or improvements to existing configuration.
Given that Edmond is a pretty backwards community as is most of Oklahoma, I suspect people will be reluctant to support one way conversions. I support one way conversions and I think it'd be better if they went with a tight diamond interchange and added Texas turnarounds at every intersection. Additionally, I think they should add new bridges over I-35 in 3 locations to prevent the situation that has unfolded in Moore with the commercial development along I-35 before it happens in Edmond. The first and most obvious is a new connection between Integris and the Fox Lake Plaza.Press Releases
Thursday, October 19, 2017
I-35 frontage roads in Edmond under review; public input sought Oct. 26
The Oklahoma Department of Transportation will present a public meeting about the future design of the I-35 frontage roads from Memorial Rd. to Second St. in Edmond.
In 2015, ODOT commissioned an I-35 corridor study from the John Kilpatrick Turnpike north to Waterloo Rd. The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and traffic needs of I-35, its interchanges and frontage roads. As part of this overall corridor evaluation, ODOT is seeking public input specific to the two-way I-35 frontage roads between Memorial Rd. and Second St. in Edmond.
Three concepts will be presented for input, including:
Improving the existing two-way frontage roads;
Converting them to one-way frontage roads south of Second St. to Memorial Rd.; or
Maintaining the existing frontage road configuration with no changes.
In the proposed options, the consultant took into consideration construction and right-of-way costs and environmental constraints.
At the meeting, the public can view the proposed frontage road concepts, speak with engineers and planners and give input on the proposed improvements.
I-35 Frontage Roads in Edmond Public Meeting
Thursday, Oct. 26
6 p.m.
Edmond Community Center Auditorium
28 E. Main St.
- https://www.ok.gov/triton/modules/ne...ticle_id=37089
Why do so many on here find it necessary to insult instead of just offering some positive improvement ideas. Guess it’s just backwards posters.
Actually Edmond shows up on many lists of most livable towns and cities. I’m sure that galls many here.
In the prior two posts, I see one person offering ideas, and one person insulting.
Just something to think about on a cool Sunday morning.
Texas Turnarounds would be the minimum improvement needed if they wanted to make it one way only.
While some blindly blather out insults about OKC or its 'burbs, let me point out that here in beautiful, progressive, pot-smokin, light-rail-served, millenial magnet Denver, there are no access roads at all. I do agree that when in OK, I am quite a driving hazard because I assume the access roads are all one-way. I far prefer them with the Texas turnarounds.
I am against the idea of making the access roads along I-35 one way. My reason. I am a retired Edmond firefighter. I worked at st 4. The idea of not being able to drive directly to a location would be a night mare. I remember driving out of that station when the first tornado to come through there a number of years back (before the one that hit Mercy) It was just south I was going north to get my engine out of danger. I would NOT have wanted to have to drive against traffic. Driving against traffic is dangerous. The city did make On Cue provide a drive up to 15th just in case it does go one way. Still I don't like the idea. I am now retired but just my 2 cents.
There are currently 44 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 44 guests)
Bookmarks