Quote Originally Posted by jerrywall View Post
Because... several reasons...

A - There are folks in the state congress who do care about local businesses and keeping revenues in the state, not in bentonville.

B - There are voters who agree.

C - It would have been easier to get the support of MADD and the Southern Baptists with a compromise like this RLAO proposal, which, while creating hundreds if not thousands of new liquor outlets, still had some controls and limitations.

D - Would have been nice to have the money for the mental health and treatment programs.

E - Would have been nice to have the growlers and crowlers.

F - Would have been nice to have in store tastings.

G - Would have been nice to have the changes to help brewpubs and in state breweries.

But I'm just a Spurs fan, not someone who is actually informed and understands the differences in the proposals.
Thank you for posting. Can you tell us what the other proposal won't do that this one would have?