^

I'm sure the prosecution didn't need it and thus didn't use those statements to gain the conviction but...

The filmmakers specifically kept it out of the series while happily including every unsubstantiated claim and innuendo of a massive conspiracy, none of which was proven at all nor has any of that resulted in any ruling, admonishment or anything else by a judge or court.

If they could prove the planting of evidence (or any of the even wilder claims) they would have done it and at least pursued a mistrial if not an acquittal.

Those two defense attorneys are sharp, well-paid dudes. They were just shotgunning a whole lot of stuff without proving any of it in the only chance they had to create reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one of the 12 jurors. And none of the jurors bought any of it.