Quote Originally Posted by Fly on the Wall View Post
I'm just spit-balling here, but I think for private development to be blocked in the name of preservation of an existing structure, the reasons and standards need to be substantial. The building preserved should:

1. Not present a public safety hazard, and,
2. Be economically viable for occupancy, and,
3. Possess a unique, not represented elsewhere, historical significance to the local community, or,
4. Possess a unique, not represented elsewhere, architectural significance to the local community.
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Could be easily argued for a yes.
4. Could be easily argued for a yes.