Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
Are you arguing just to argue?

Give some thought to what KP said, and instead of getting hung up on the fact that he *is* putting a gun in the same category as x, y, and z, parse *why* he is putting gun in the same category as xyz...because that's his actual point.

Your follow up to KP's original post went something like "Well why don't we legalize grenades and atomic bombs" which means you missed the point of KP's original post.
First off, thank you for actually discussing this with me. I believe that I didn't misinterpret his initial point, which can be summarized by

At some point you simply have to decide to lay the responsibility of the walking talking tools, and not whatever inanimate tool that is misused.
My follow up statement, about legalizing more dangerous weapons, was to show that yes, while a person is to blame, the tool isn't irrelevant like he implied. So no, I'm not arguing just to argue, I'm stating that just because humans are the users of "tools" or "weapons," does not make the tool or weapon irrelevant.