Quote Originally Posted by Midtowner View Post
I'm not sure why it's even relevant to talk about what qualifies him to be mayor. How about nearly a decade of actually being the mayor?
I think he's been the best. Some would say Norick. But OKC was so desperate when Norick put MAPS up that we passed it. He obviously deserves credit for thinking of it, however.

I like the fact that Mick has been supportive diversity and urbanism. Perhaps it's because it was before their time, but Norick and Humphreys weren't as sophisticated in this regard.

Also, Mick has avoided getting in petty disputes, such as Humphreys' issue with the Pride banners.

And no one, no mayor, that we've had in OKC can hold a candle to him in representing OKC on the national stage. He is extremely respected by his fellow mayors, and he has been a strong advocate for urban issues in Washington, even when those issues have conflicted with his political party's orthodoxy.