Well, anderson, that's where we'll just have to disagree

That's really the crux of the debate as well as what the Supremes based their decision on in Roe v. Wade. There is no medical fact out there that defines when a person become a person. It's a philosophical debate more than anything else. Unfortunately, with most philosophical debates, there is simply no middle ground.

I maintain my position that it is not a person until it would be capable of surviving outside the womb. Until then, it is something with the potential to be a person. But a sperm and egg also have the potential to be human, should we not make use of every single sperm and egg?

Anyhow, I think that logically, we have arrived at an impasse.