Yeah, I wasn't saying they weren't valid at all. I felt like you were asking them mostly rhetorically to make a point, and some readers were missing said point. Based on other posts you've made, I was guessing you were trying to point out that the community in general and even members of the city council -- who could potentially make the ultimate decision here -- probably don't place the same importance on "urbanism," "streetwalls" and the like that some of the posters here do.
I think some of the folks have mis-read your posts as being supportive of the urbanism issue when in fact you've been mostly derisive regarding those positions. And I'm not condemning your viewpoint; only making an observation that I think a few people are missing. Am I correct?
Bookmarks