Mike, visit your local homeowners' associations. Have them all go in on a lawyer and sue the landlord and club owners for nuisance.

Some fun cases to read:

1) This one actually has a rather hilarious (and short) fact pattern. It's from 1955 and you'll know it real quick. It's not really on point because it's a criminal case and as you've said, you've had no luck getting the OCPD to actually enforce the law.

Gibson v. State:

1 The defendants, Ketter Gordon and Jack Pittman, were jointly charged in the County Court of Seminole County with operating and maintaining a public nuisance, were tried, found guilty and sentenced to serve 90 days in jail and pay a fine of $250 and have appealed.

¶2 The only issue presented by the appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

¶3 The proof of the State showed that the defendants operated a barbecue stand and dance hall in the negro community known as Nobletown near Wewoka. Several officers testified to having visited the place of business of defendants at various times and having observed mixed crowds of colored and white people there drinking and carousing. Many arrests had been made at or near defendants' place of business for drunkenness, fighting, assault with a dangerous weapon and attempted rape. Many other witnesses testified to having gone to the premises of the accused and there having purchased intoxicating liquor from one or the other of the defendants. Some of them testified to buying whiskey in Seven Up bottles for $1.00 a bottle and others bought "Choctaw" beer. Fights in which knives were used were not uncommon and on one occasion, according to a witness, the defendant Gordon hit a teenage boy so hard with a pistol that it almost severed his ear. Many white teenagers from Wewoka would attend the dances where the music was provided generally by a jukebox.

¶4 The proof of the sale and open drinking of intoxicating liquor and a general course of disorderly conduct was wholly sufficient for the jury to determine that the two defendants were operating and maintaining a public nuisance in accordance with the definition of our statute, 50 O.S. 1951 § 2 [50-2]. King v. State, 71 Okl.Cr. 158, 109 P.2d 836; Hilbert v. State, 44 Okl.Cr. 89, 279 P. 910. Judgment and sentence of the County Court of Seminole County is affirmed.
2) MACKEY v. STATE EX REL. HARRIS was a case where the defendant was operating a place called the Red Dog Saloone back in the late 60s/early 70s in OKC. The complaints were much the same as what Mike is complaining about. Through the courts, eventually, the plaintiffs acquired an order permanently closing the business, requiring the sheriff to padlock the door. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, finding that the trial court found that there was indeed a public nuisance, affirmed.

OSCN Found Document:MACKEY v. STATE EX REL. HARRIS

In short, if the renters don't meet your demands and the noise issue really is bad, then you do have more than adequate remedies through the courts.