Certainly, I agree with the main post ... the Hornets were cold and not on track in the game v. Boston.
Beyond that, even after yesterday evening's OT loss to Portland, before a paltry crowd of 12,305 in Portland (who should be sorely embarassed at their lack of fan support), and even though the Hornets record at may well get worse before the Hornets return to OKC midweek (Wednesday) against the Clippers, it remains true that this year is something akin to a "tale of 2 cities", and I don't mean NOLA being one of them.
What I mean is this: (a) the Hornets record (b) juxtaposed to local fan support, whether the team itself wins or loses. Those are the "2 cities" that I mean.
So far so good for the "fan support" in OKC. The Boston game followed a 2 game loss run. Even though weather conditions were horrible in OKC (about 10 degrees, light snow, at a Wednesday game), the game was a near sellout at 18,753.
The Boston loss made it 3 losses in a row, and Portand's game last night made it 4 losses in a row. Not a good "streak".
Tomorrow, the Hornets play at Sacramento, and then at Phoenix, before they return to OKC to play the Clippers on Wednesday next.
It is easily forseeable that, when the Hornets return to OKC on that Wednesday, that they will be 8-13.
That's the tale of "one city", the Hornets W/L success. The tale of the other ... fan support in OKC ... may well be indicated this coming Wednesday if the Hornets lose all of their 3-game road trip.
And, so, as to the latter "city", this upcoming Wednesday, 12/14, may give a clue as to whether the "2nd city" has the mettle to weather the "1st city's" non-thrilling performance of late.
As an Okie, I'm hoping that the "2nd city" is up to the challenge, regardless of what the Hornet's record is when it returns to OKC. But, as a realist, we shall see what we shall see.
I'll be there.
Bookmarks