Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Sprawl

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Sprawl

    Thought this would be interesting to some of you.

    A New Index to Measure Sprawl Gives High Marks to Los Angeles - CityLab

  2. #2

    Default Re: Sprawl

    If you want to see bad sprawl, check out Mexico City. That is freaking crazy!

  3. #3

    Default Re: Sprawl

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    If you want to see bad sprawl, check out Mexico City. That is freaking crazy!
    You think that's bad, you should see Spatula City.



  4. #4

    Default Re: Sprawl

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    If you want to see bad sprawl, check out Mexico City. That is freaking crazy!
    I've never been to Mexico City and I've honestly never spent much time "researching" it (Google certified), but I remember reading somewhere that it suffers from a similar topography problem that the Los Angeles metro area suffers from as well.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Sprawl

    Most of the City of L.A. is very dense. It's the suburbs that are sprawled and a good reason for much of the spreading out has to do with topography. There are lots of hills and mountains surrounding the city which are either protected or unbuildable.

    Here is the sprawl rankings. Not surprisingly, OKC ranks very poorly, although both Dallas and Ft. Worth are worse and Houston only slightly better.




    Full table of rankings

  6. #6

    Default Re: Sprawl

    Mexico city covers a lot ground space but it's not what I would call sprawl. Mexico City has 21 million people in a dry lake bed that is only about 30 miles across. That is the equivalent of squeezing the population of Texas into a circle 15 miles around the Cox Center. Sprawl to me is more about land use practices, lot size, transportation networks, and giant parking lots.

    If I had to come up with a way to measure sprawl it would be a 4-way intersection per sq mile and cul-de-sac index. Less than 50 4-way intersections or more than 4 cul-de-sacs per sq mile is sprawl.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Sprawl

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Mexico city covers a lot ground space but it's not what I would call sprawl. Mexico City has 21 million people in a dry lake bed that is only about 30 miles across. That is the equivalent of squeezing the population of Texas into a circle 15 miles around the Cox Center. Sprawl to me is more about land use practices, lot size, transportation networks, and giant parking lots.

    If I had to come up with a way to measure sprawl it would be a 4-way intersection per sq mile and cul-de-sac index. Less than 50 4-way intersections or more than 4 cul-de-sacs per sq mile is sprawl.
    I was going to post something similar. You said it very well. It's the largest city, population wise, in North America. The Federal District does, in fact, have a population of 21,000,000.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Cost of Low Density Sprawl
    By Just the facts in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-03-2014, 05:45 PM
  2. Who is going to the OKC SPRAWL Community Meeting?
    By Urban Pioneer in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: 10-06-2011, 09:11 AM
  3. A little rant about urban sprawl
    By Oh GAWD the Smell! in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-14-2008, 07:00 PM
  4. Urban Sprawl
    By Pete in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-13-2005, 12:48 AM
  5. Urban Sprawl
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-01-2004, 02:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO