Widgets Magazine
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 56

Thread: Red Ridge (SE Corner of I-44 and Lincoln)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Lincoln Area Red Ridge (SE Corner of I-44 and Lincoln)

    We recently moved offices across the street (Central Park) and noticed the swath of undeveloped land on the SE corner of I-44 and Lincoln (all the way east to Kelley and south to 50th, minus the Burr Oaks neighborhood in the SE corner).

    Doing some research, it looks like "DFK LLC" paid nearly $7MM for ~135 acres (mostly zoned ag - some residential) in 2008, during the heart of the recession. They even purchased some of the residential lots in Burr Oaks fronting 50th & Kelley.

    I was curious if anyone had any knowledge of the plans for that area?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	lincoln and 50th.jpg 
Views:	231 
Size:	24.7 KB 
ID:	3254

  2. #2

    Default Re: SE Corner of I-44 and Lincoln

    Don't know about any plans for the area, but I recently found the background on the space which you might find interesting. When my wife and I lived in Central Park we ventured into the area one hot summer evening and it was one of the creepiest experiences I've had in OKC. Felt like Jason Voorhees was about to jump out of the woods at any minute. The weirdest thing was that in the middle of this giant empty overgrown abandoned lot we found, on the ground, a fresh chocolate chip cookie. Just sitting there. Not even ants on it or anything.

    The pictures in the link don't speak to the eeriness about the place.

    http://www.abandonedok.com/red-ridge/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,022
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: SE Corner of I-44 and Lincoln

    Those images make me sick just to see the disrepair. In the late 70's I officed there when we used it as headquarters for Oklahoma Monthly Magazine. At the time it was an elegant old structure, but in good repair. My office was upstairs and opened to the top level veranda shown in some of the pictures. The "ballroom" with the big fireplace was used as a photography area. The grounds were well kept at the time and it was an amazing environment to be in. So sad to see it now.

    BTW, at that time our lead reporter was Mike Boettcher. Mike went to be one of the original CNN reporters, was the lead war correspondent/analyst for NBC in first Gulf War, and now is an award winning journalist embedded with troops in Afghanistan, along with his son Carlos.

  4. Default Re: SE Corner of I-44 and Lincoln


  5. #5

    Lincoln Area LIncoln & I44 Development

    http://www.oklahoman.com/article/546...coln%2C%20I-44

    Homes, businesses, parks and a hotel are envisioned under a plan for 134 acres now mostly covered by trees at NE 50 Street and N Lincoln Boulevard, two miles north of the state Capitol.

  6. #6

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    I don't have a sub. :/ I'm asking you to post it, but are there any renderings of it? I'm curious how serious of a development this is and how soon it might break ground. This sounds cool.

  7. #7

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    I don't have a sub. :/ I'm asking you to post it, but are there any renderings of it? I'm curious how serious of a development this is and how soon it might break ground. This sounds cool.
    Yes, there is a rendering and it looks great but I don't want to copy it to post here. That is frowned on. This would be developed by the Oklahoma Commissioners of the Land Office and it sounds like a serious proposal.

    Plupan, you could easily get a subscription for what you spend for gas for one day.

  8. #8

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by ljbab728 View Post
    Yes, there is a rendering and it looks great but I don't want to copy it to post here. That is frowned on. This would be developed by the Oklahoma Commissioners of the Land Office and it sounds like a serious proposal.
    I understand. I just stumbled on a free link Oklahoma agency plans major development near Lincoln, I-44 | News OK

    This looks really cool!!!! I really hope this is built.

  9. #9

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    The state could lease land to sell parcels. Full development could take seven to 10 years. The first phase would likely be retail facilities at the southwest corner of the property.
    :/

    7-10 years. Well, I think that's what Chisholm Creek originally stated and then they pushed their timeline way up, so maybe the same will happen with this. I don't like the possible "retail facility at the southwest corner" which for some reason translates to strip mall for me.

    Oklahoma agency plans major development near Lincoln, I-44 | News OK

  10. #10

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    I personally doubt that this development would be successful. If anyone has ever traveled Lincoln Blvd. on the weekend then you know it is a complete ghost town. A grocery store would be a godsend. I'll wait and see if the Binkowski's follow through with their promise to build an Uptown Market at NE 23rd St. & MLK.

  11. #11

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by Brett View Post
    I personally doubt that this development would be successful. If anyone has ever traveled Lincoln Blvd. on the weekend then you know it is a complete ghost town. A grocery store would be a godsend. I'll wait and see if the Binkowski's follow through with their promise to build an Uptown Market at NE 23rd St. & MLK.
    That area is only a ghost town because there is nothing along that corridor, once this is built you could guarantee success.

  12. #12

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by loveOKC View Post
    That area is only a ghost town because there is nothing along that corridor, once this is built you could guarantee success.
    Well truth be told, hasn't Lincoln Blvd been targeted for redevelopment for about 2 decades now? To be fair there has been some redevelopment and even some new construction but for the most part a lot of Lincoln is fallow lots where gross hooker motels use to stand.

    Forgive me for being skeptical, but my family has been on the NE side for over 5 decades and could write a novel on lofty plans that never made it past the drawing board. Props to the CLO for at least trying, but there is pretty baked in east-o-phobia in OKC; if all the empty fields haven't developed in the past, why now? I would probably be a bit more bullish if this was something on a smaller scale and more service/retail oriented (vs offices that will empty out at 5).

  13. #13

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    I personally think it's an absolutely fantastic location, and definitely a place where "If you build it they will come" applies.

    The nice thing for this development in addition to their own housing, you've got Central Park apartments right there and several hundred people working right across Lincoln. Factor in the relative closeness to The Adventure District, and the State Capitol and this has a chance to be very successful. Plus, the NE side is severely lacking in amenities. If they drop enough money into the area, this gets set-up as a great future extension of the street car (possibly in the mid-late 2030s).

    And being right off 44 and so close to 235, it has great access to Edmond.

    I think the only thing that will inhibit success is developing on the cheap. Attempt to do all this for $80M, and they'll be sorry they even tried. Tackle this with $250M+, they'll be very happy with the final, long-term results.

  14. Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    I personally think it's an absolutely fantastic location, and definitely a place where "If you build it they will come" applies.

    The nice thing for this development in addition to their own housing, you've got Central Park apartments right there and several hundred people working right across Lincoln. Factor in the relative closeness to The Adventure District, and the State Capitol and this has a chance to be very successful. Plus, the NE side is severely lacking in amenities. If they drop enough money into the area, this gets set-up as a great future extension of the street car (possibly in the mid-late 2030s).

    And being right off 44 and so close to 235, it has great access to Edmond.

    I think the only thing that will inhibit success is developing on the cheap. Attempt to do all this for $80M, and they'll be sorry they even tried. Tackle this with $250M+, they'll be very happy with the final, long-term results.
    We've been talking about Lincoln Blvd redevelopment for my entire life, a quarter century. I know that this discussion begun much sooner than that, as well. When the GOP rushed into power at 23rd and Lincoln, the State abandoned its "Lincoln Renaissance" development program - which was simply a masterplan for how state agencies will grow into space along Lincoln. Having a masterplan gives confidence which tends to make funding available, so that was bad...

    Then Tanenbaum got involved with the Plaza Hotel site, right after his group built those swanky suburban-styled apartments that they like to call "Central Park" (odd name). The state has continued to do some things off and on, and then on the southern end stuff is happening again in the OUHSC and where that connects into Bricktown.

    So how can Pettis claim that the state's redevelopment proposals for Lincoln "come as a surprise?" How can residents behind the property make the same claim? Lincoln has always been a major redevelopment push. I think what people mean is "we didn't know they were serious about this." That said, not including Pettis in this process - big mistake. That councilman has proven himself to be a valuable advocate for issues/projects he gets involved with, and he has a vision and the ability to revitalize Northeast OKC. Involving Pettis is how you tie this Lincoln development into other projects across the Northeast side, including his 23rd "King Crossing" strip mall, his TIF for the old strip mall north of there, and the MAPS3 senior center. I just wish he didn't love strip malls so much...

  15. #15

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    I can tell you a lot of neighbors were not very happy when they found out about this proposal and the city council seemed to be in the dark about it as well. Pettis has said the city has had no part in this so far.

  16. #16

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by swosuknight View Post
    I can tell you a lot of neighbors were not very happy when they found out about this proposal and the city council seemed to be in the dark about it as well. Pettis has said the city has had no part in this so far.
    why are neighbors not happy?

  17. #17

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    why are neighbors not happy?
    You have to understand the makeup of some of the close neighbors. A lot of the people have been there many, many years and it is a relatively quite area. It is one of the reasons they picked the area to live in the first place. Anything bringing more traffic and more people to the area is frowned upon. Also, believe it or not there is a lot of wildlife in the area that many people enjoy. Clearing out that large of an area would affect this in a negative way. I have mixed feelings about it. I live close by as well. I would love a grocery store close by but I also worry about all the increased traffic and people it would bring to the area.

  18. #18

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by swosuknight View Post
    I can tell you a lot of neighbors were not very happy when they found out about this proposal and the city council seemed to be in the dark about it as well. Pettis has said the city has had no part in this so far.
    That's a shocker.

  19. #19

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    I know not everyone shares this opinion, but I staunchly believe that all land within the Grand Blvd Loop should be assumed for dense Urban development land use. And really, it doesn't matter what you or I or anyone else believes, it is dictated by economics, and will be increasingly so as time moves forward.

    And just as the people complaining about Guyute's, the neighbors need to understand that complaining about increased property values will likely fall on deaf ears. The neighbors should be focused on demanding that development of a certain quality take place, yes, but if this entity is coming in to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to develop this land in a sustainable, urban-minded manner, then it's quite simply foolish to block it.

    And when you consider the insane industrial nature of everything literally caddy-corner to this site, it's even less surprising and should be less aggravating. This is never going to be a wild-life reserve, and probably shouldn't be considering the Zoo is exactly 1 mile away.

  20. #20

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    There is development phobia on the Eastside because of the history of Deep Deuce and Walnut Grove. Black residents are fearful that "They are trying to make all of this downtown," which given that many people remember a time when their grandparents owned homes in near central neighborhoods is not a completely irrational fear. Longtime residents have a long, bitter history with developments that have not only disadvantaged them but have all too often displaced them. Hence what needs to happen is anyone attempting anything major in or near Eastside neighborhoods ought to discuss plans with locals leaders and neighborhood associations to allay fears and listen to concerns.

    That being said, I just hope this thing is urban, well-done, and transit-ready.

  21. #21

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by boitoirich View Post
    There is development phobia on the Eastside because of the history of Deep Deuce and Walnut Grove. Black residents are fearful that "They are trying to make all of this downtown," which given that many people remember a time when their grandparents owned homes in near central neighborhoods is not a completely irrational fear. Longtime residents have a long, bitter history with developments that have not only disadvantaged them but have all too often displaced them. Hence what needs to happen is anyone attempting anything major in or near Eastside neighborhoods ought to discuss plans with locals leaders and neighborhood associations to allay fears and listen to concerns.

    That being said, I just hope this thing is urban, well-done, and transit-ready.
    ^^^^spoken like a true east sider!

  22. #22

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Is this going to happen?

  23. #23

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Quote Originally Posted by AP View Post
    Is this going to happen?
    It's always just been a concept without a developer.

    Would love to see it happen but it's just fantasy at this point.

  24. #24

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Reviving an old thread, but any word on this development? I'm hearing rumors of Section 8 housing.

  25. #25

    Default Re: LIncoln & I44 Development

    Kind of associated, not really, but didn't know where else to place it. Admin, feel free to move to another thread.

    22 acres along Lincoln Blvd. headed for development

    By: Molly M. Fleming The Journal Record March 29, 2018

    OKLAHOMA CITY – The Commissioners of the Land Office plans to sell property along Lincoln Boulevard.

    But first the CLO wants to make sure the area has regulations in place for good design. The office asked the city of Oklahoma City to create a design overlay for the district.

    “We want to make sure (the area) is nice,” said Jessica Grogis, director of communications for the land office. “It’s coming into the Capitol. We don’t want vacant land that’s just being mowed.”

    The land office owns 22.2 acres within what could be the Lincoln Boulevard Corridor. The land was previously owned by the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority and was bonded. State-owned land with debt can’t be developed, so the CLO paid the debt and was deeded the land in November 2017.

    Since the land was deeded to the CLO via legislation that became effective in November, the office was able to start working with the city earlier. City Planner Michael Philbrick presented an initial idea for the overlay district at the Urban Design Commission’s September meeting.

    The overlay district boundary runs from NE 30th Street to Central Park Drive. The east and west boundary lines vary based on each parcel’s size, but the boundaries are generally less than a city block on each side. The district overlay does not include a 134-acre parcel at NE 50th Street and Lincoln Boulevard. Philbrick said the CLO is creating a planned-unit development for the site.

    On Wednesday, Philbrick presented the overlay district’s regulations at the Urban Design Commission meeting, seeking a recommendation for the Planning Commission.

    Under the new overlay, the underlying zoning for the land will not change. The three zones in the district are industrial, commercial, and office.

    Some uses that fall within those zoning categories will be prohibited. Those uses include animal raising, bingo parlors, hazardous waste disposal, and stockyards. There are 24 uses that are being prohibited. Philbrick said those uses are not compatible with an area that serves at the primary entrance to the state Capitol.

    “No uses being prohibited are on the ground today,” he said.

    Multifamily housing has been added as an allowed use.

    The new overlay will not allow parking lots in front of office buildings, which is a prominent design in the area. There has been a slight change in the building setback requirement. But the existing properties will not have to make any changes to fit in the new overlay. New construction will have to take the overlay into consideration though, said urban planner Lisa Chronister during Wednesday’s meeting.

    The overlay also creates a minimum building height at two stories. Philbrick said the area is an infill corridor, so the goal is to create density. He said there are exceptions to the two-story height, though. Convenience stores and quick-service restaurants can still be one story.

    If the overlay is approved, the Urban Design Commission will have to approve any new projects within the district. The commission made a recommendation to the Planning Commission to approve the overlay district ordinance. The Planning Commission meeting agenda with the ordinance has not been set yet.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Presley (formerly Lincoln Plaza)
    By warreng88 in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 248
    Last Post: 06-26-2024, 11:46 AM
  2. Lincoln
    By RadicalModerate in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-06-2013, 04:01 PM
  3. Lincoln Renaissance
    By sethsrott in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-09-2010, 04:37 PM
  4. Mizzou is getting it in the neck in Lincoln!
    By jmarkross in forum Sports
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-01-2010, 08:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO