Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
maybe
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Holy crap...it's the perfect example of how good inspection could have prevented a problem though. A subcontractor doesn't follow the plans or does something less than adequate to save a buck/time on their watch. Then the building falls down.
Where were the QA guys during construction making sure that the construction guys were following what they were supposed to. You don't build 20 floors wrong without SOMEONE noticing.
Not really relevant to OKC, but it is something every new construction site needs to keep in mind. Not that the Devon Tower will have these problems, but sticking with code is important.
Wow...why the Seattle bashing?
Well, at least they're not tearing down their buildings for fun.
I don't think that this is really an attempt at bashing Seatle as a city so much as it is a relevant story regarding a fairly recent large scale construction project that was utilizing a similar structural system as is being used for the Devon Tower.
This in no way is a statement that should lower anyone's confidence in the structural system of the Devon Tower. It is relevant in that just like any other construction site, there are many wrong ways to do things that can have unintended consequences, as in the example cited in Seatle.
Contractors always try to find ways to save money in the process which will essentially add to thier bottom line by requesting substitutions of either materials or less expensive brands to replace what was originally called for and specified in the construction drawings or specifications. It is the obligation of the contractors to seek approvals of the subsitutions and to demonstrate and prove equivalency to the architect and or Structural Engineer, who are then required to approve or reject the submittal request.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks