Wall Street Journal Ranks OKC the fifth-hottest US Job Market

[soonerguru]

This is a great indication of the growth in this city and its economy. Everything appears to be rising: job opportunities, labor participation, wages, etc. Great publicity and a testament to where OKC is as a city now, a national player.

https://www.wsj.com/economy/jobs/uta...finds-e67d0171

[Bowser214]

According to the article from MoneyGeek OKC is No. 1 for job seekers. Using data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development,
https://www.moneygeek.com/living/top...s-job-seekers/

[soonerguru]

According to the article from MoneyGeek OKC is No. 1 for job seekers. Using data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development,
https://www.moneygeek.com/living/top...s-job-seekers/

That's awesome. Nice find!

[bison34]

https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news...n/73954962007/

Not bad. Hopefully this trend continues.

[jn1780]

People have been saying we are becoming a Global economy for at least 20 years now, but with the rise of remote work people truly can choose where they live if they are a white collar worker. Really, the only thing that holds Oklahoma back is k-12 education system. Kind of hard to do that online, but even how we do that is going to change as time goes on.

[PhiAlpha]

People have been saying we are becoming a Global economy for at least 20 years now, but with the rise of remote work people truly can choose where they live if they are a white collar worker. Really, the only thing that holds Oklahoma back is k-12 education system. Kind of hard to do that online, but even how we do that is going to change as time goes on.

And I think that is a bit of a perception issue. Places like Edmond, Jenks, and some of the other suburbs stack up very well nationally.

[Bunty]

And I think that is a bit of a perception issue. Places like Edmond, Jenks, and some of the other suburbs stack up very well nationally.

I'm not sure about that. AreaVibes scores Edmond 78 for livability. Jenks is 70. Yukon is only 65. Moore is 73. Strangely enough, Stillwater scores 82 for livability. But OU fans can rejoice and be relieved because Norman is rated as a better place to live by one point--83.

[Canoe]

I'm not sure about that. AreaVibes scores Edmond 78 for livability. Jenks is 70. Yukon is only 65. Moore is 73. Strangely enough, Stillwater scores 82 for livability. But OU fans can rejoice and be relieved because Norman is rated as a better place to live by one point--83.

That one point was a hanging chad and the intent of the voter was to give a point to Stillwater and not Norman. The new official score is Stillwater 83 and Norman 82.

[mugofbeer]

Wasn't PhiAlpha referring to the schools?

[PhiAlpha]

Wasn't PhiAlpha referring to the schools?

Yes.

[Midtowner]

Anecdotally, at least, I don't think this holds up unless the rest of the country is headed for a big economic downturn. I'm in close contact with a large staffing company here in OK and their placements are WAY down, and even where employers want to hire, they don't have the capital to do it with. Times are about to be bad I think.

[OKCRealtor]

Anecdotally, at least, I don't think this holds up unless the rest of the country is headed for a big economic downturn. I'm in close contact with a large staffing company here in OK and their placements are WAY down, and even where employers want to hire, they don't have the capital to do it with. Times are about to be bad I think.

The economy isn't nearly as strong as what the Fed would like us to believe and it wouldn't surprise me at all to have a nice little recession in the back half of the year now that nobody is really talking about it. That said I think we'll fair pretty well here in Oklahoma compared to what could happen a lot of other places. Economy here is much more diversified than it was in the past which should help. They appear poised to let things run their course at least through the election.

[Ryan]

The economy isn't nearly as strong as what the Fed would like us to believe and it wouldn't surprise me at all to have a nice little recession in the back half of the year now that nobody is really talking about it. That said I think we'll fair pretty well here in Oklahoma compared to what could happen a lot of other places. Economy here is much more diversified than it was in the past which should help. They appear poised to let things run their course at least through the election.

It’s an interesting statement. I was looking at my w2!and I’m doing about 40% better than the 2010’s and I bout a house in 2017 for 120k in Coronado heights . well I sold it last year for $214 cash. So I’m like this is great. Then I used that to upgrade homes. So all that’s gone. That said the interest rate feels really high. And tends to increase/drop in 1/4’s percent. I’d like to know where this Jerome Powell guy came from or is so I could ring his neck
And soft landing sounds like an ongoing process that will never end. I think recessions are a “fact of life” in supply side economies.

[Rover]

That said the interest rate feels really high.
And tends to increase/drop in 1/4’s percent. I’d like to know where this Jerome Powell guy came from or is so I could ring his neck
And soft landing sounds like an ongoing process that will never end. I think recessions are a “fact of life” in supply side economies.

Interest rates are at approximately the average of the last 200 years of US Economy. Comparing current rates to historic low rates induced by the second worst depression/recession in US history isn't a fair target.

Powell served as an assistant secretary and as undersecretary of the Treasury under President George H.W. Bush. Powell was made Fed Chair by Trump.

What we have now is a bastardization of economic philosophies, trying to take selected populist views of both supply side economic policies and demand side. We have very few in congress who even understand basics of economic theory but take simplistic views they think makes them popular with their voting base and helps them get elected. They would falil most Econ 101 tests. They grossly ignore the mitigating factors and focus on ones that are good political fodder.

[The]

Recession that nobody is taking about? The recession has been coming for like 3 years now.

[OKCRealtor]

Recession that nobody is taking about? The recession has been coming for like 3 years now.

There's has been a lot less talk this year compared to the last couple as many believe the Fed has achieved the soft landing and appear to have everything right where they want it.

Personally think it's laughable and Fed/Fiscal Policy have very little credibility the last 4 years so I'm not sure why they'd be right this time. Good chance they'll leave rates restrictive until it's too late. We'll see though, so far it hasn't happened and it still might not. Massive government spending & federal job creation keeps kicking the can further down the road.

[Jersey Boss]

There's has been a lot less talk this year compared to the last couple as many believe the Fed has achieved the soft landing and appear to have everything right where they want it.

Personally think it's laughable and Fed/Fiscal Policy have very little credibility the last 4 years so I'm not sure why they'd be right this time. Good chance they'll leave rates restrictive until it's too late. We'll see though, so far it hasn't happened and it still might not. Massive government spending & federal job creation keeps kicking the can further down the road.

Facts be damned, it's feelings.

[PoliSciGuy]

Recession that nobody is taking about? The recession has been coming for like 3 years now.

Economists have predicted 18 of the last 3 recessions

[Dob Hooligan]

Economists have predicted 18 of the last 3 recessions

Truer words were never spoken, sir.

[jn1780]

We should be lucky that rates are as low as they are with the size of our debt load. Besides curbing inflation, having the ability to lower the fed funds rate makes the Federal Reserve appear useful the next time a recession hits.

I guess the question is what is the technical limit we can keep taking on debt before we have to do full blow monetization?

[citywokchinesefood]

We should be lucky that rates are as low as they are with the size of our debt load. Besides curbing inflation, having the ability to lower the fed funds rate makes the Federal Reserve appear useful the next time a recession hits.

I guess the question is what is the technical limit we can keep taking on debt before we have to do full blow monetization?

The Japanese are a few decades ahead of us in figuring that limit out.

[jn1780]

The Japanese are a few decades ahead of us in figuring that limit out.

Japan also have a huge home savings rate. A different 'problem' for their central bank. They have had a stagnant economy because their population is fixated on the future and saving money while the US population has no problem spending money, but is know realizing that a bunch of people are about to retire and didn't save anything.

[mugofbeer]

Japan also have a huge home savings rate. A different 'problem' for their central bank. They have had a stagnant economy because their population is fixated on the future and saving money while the US population has no problem spending money, but is know realizing that a bunch of people are about to retire and didn't save anything.

Japan has a stagnant and aging population which is much of why their economy is stagnant.

[Rover]

Japan has a stagnant and aging population which is much of why their economy is stagnant.

People focus on one or two things and blame the problems on that rather than fully understanding how all the factors influence each other. Mal-informed and uneducated (on economics) politicians tend to do the same. Aging populations, birth rates, immigration policies, money supply, savings rates, gdp growth, efficiency, r&d investment, tax policies, etc, etc, etc all are significant factors. It is fruitless to blame one without acknowledging the full effect of the other factors and their interdependencies. It is a complex issue that many skew to try to prove out their pet peeve or political bias.

[Rover]

We should be lucky that rates are as low as they are with the size of our debt load. Besides curbing inflation, having the ability to lower the fed funds rate makes the Federal Reserve appear useful the next time a recession hits.

I guess the question is what is the technical limit we can keep taking on debt before we have to do full blow monetization?

Depends on growth of efficiency and total growth of the economy. Think about taking on a debt at 5% that will grow your income by 10%. You would do that all day long. However, if interest is at 10% and you can't earn but 5%, your debt is too high, no matter the level. If the debt load is growing faster than gains in efficiency and output we have a problem. If you have no debt and have no growth, you are dead in the water. Debt, efficiency and output are intertwined and are contextual with each other.