Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 25 of 2708

Thread: University Town Center

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    this is not what was said in Sept ..

    80% of the entire plans 1 billion dollar cost would be privately funded ..




    https://www.oudaily.com/news/1-billi...95498c17f.html
    That was September. This is 2 months later.
    https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html
    A staff report posted as part of the agenda for Tuesday evening read:

    “Under the proposal, a combination of University and private resources would combine to fund approximately 40% of the total arena construction costs, while the University would only use approximately 25% of the event dates. Team Norman has asked the City to consider funding the remainder of the construction costs as well as some additional infrastructure utilizing tax increment financing.”



    If this arena is constructed it would be the smallest seat wise in the SEC. This is what Norman is being asked to fund?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Boss View Post
    That was September. This is 2 months later.
    https://www.oudaily.com/news/enterta...9d8b160a2.html
    A staff report posted as part of the agenda for Tuesday evening read:

    “Under the proposal, a combination of University and private resources would combine to fund approximately 40% of the total arena construction costs, while the University would only use approximately 25% of the event dates. Team Norman has asked the City to consider funding the remainder of the construction costs as well as some additional infrastructure utilizing tax increment financing.”



    If this arena is constructed it would be the smallest seat wise in the SEC. This is what Norman is being asked to fund?
    nothing changed

  3. #3

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    nothing changed
    How did nothing change? Unless they were being intentionally vague with the costs of each element in the September meeting, and 80% of the total cost, while correct, is broken out amongst multiple items?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    How did nothing change? Unless they were being intentionally vague with the costs of each element in the September meeting, and 80% of the total cost, while correct, is broken out amongst multiple items?
    i mean i think they purposefully left it vague before... i think they are going to hit the 80% of the total overall development being university and private, but the arena is a big sunk cost that they won't be able to recoop the private investment on as quickly, so they are offing that more to the city.... so i wouldn't say bait and switch, but a purposeful misdirection to try and make it sound good to the citizens

  5. #5

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    i mean i think they purposefully left it vague before... i think they are going to hit the 80% of the total overall development being university and private, but the arena is a big sunk cost that they won't be able to recoop the private investment on as quickly, so they are offing that more to the city.... so i wouldn't say bait and switch, but a purposeful misdirection to try and make it sound good to the citizens
    Ironically, if 40% private was being thrown around for the new OKC arena, this board wouldn’t have anything to complain about.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    Ironically, if 40% private was being thrown around for the new OKC arena, this board wouldn’t have anything to complain about.
    Oh, they'd find something.......

  7. #7

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    i mean i think they purposefully left it vague before... i think they are going to hit the 80% of the total overall development being university and private, but the arena is a big sunk cost that they won't be able to recoop the private investment on as quickly, so they are offing that more to the city.... so i wouldn't say bait and switch, but a purposeful misdirection to try and make it sound good to the citizens
    You are right. They added in a bunch of private ancillary development to make the non public cost percentages look better, even though there are no specifics, no timetables and no guarantees of the surrounding developments.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by onthestrip View Post
    You are right. They added in a bunch of private ancillary development to make the non public cost percentages look better, even though there are no specifics, no timetables and no guarantees of the surrounding developments.
    This is exactly the point OU professor DR. Cynthia Rogers made when it was announced in Sept
    Read this fact based and the evidence on why this is a bad deal for Norman.
    Remember all the promises made to get UNP that never materialized, such as the lifestyle center.

    https://www.normantranscript.com/opi...b819eab87.html

  9. #9

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    How did nothing change? Unless they were being intentionally vague with the costs of each element in the September meeting, and 80% of the total cost, while correct, is broken out amongst multiple items?
    it was allays presented as 80% private dollars of the total development ..
    80% of the plan's $1 billion cost will be covered through private funds
    i am suprised that the city only has to pay 60% or the arena costs .. i thought it would be more ..

  10. #10

    Default Re: Proposed Entertainment District

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    it was allays presented as 80% private dollars of the total development ..

    i am suprised that the city only has to pay 60% or the arena costs .. i thought it would be more ..
    That still sucks we’ll have the seat count if true like really

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 83 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 83 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. North Park Mall
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-15-2008, 11:08 PM
  2. University North Park Updates
    By dismayed in forum Suburban & Other OK Communities
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-26-2008, 06:48 PM
  3. Couch Park update!
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-03-2007, 09:23 AM
  4. Construction to begin on Stiles Park monument
    By Luke in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-25-2004, 12:56 AM
  5. OKC opens new park in 20 years
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-01-2004, 03:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO