[QUOTE=Patrick]And by the way, changing opinions over time is what did change the Hippocratic Oath:

:backtotop And by the way, that is why the decision was handed down regarding Roe Vs Wade..I think it's called, enlightenment.

I admitted I was wrong. What else do you want me to do?

What do I want you to do? I want you to open your mind, get off your highhorse and use your common sense regarding the subject about which we are supposed to be posting.

[quote=Patrick]And by the way, changing opinions over time is what did change the Hippocratic Oath:

:backtotop And by the way, that is why the decision was handed down regarding Roe Vs Wade..I think it's called, enlightenment.

No, it's because one lady got pissed over the issue, and took her suit to court.

What do I want you to do? I want you to open your mind, get off your highhorse and use your common sense regarding the subject about which we are supposed to be posting.

That's exactly what I'm doing.

Thanks. Good day.

[quote=GrandMaMa]

No, it's because one lady got pissed over the issue, and took her suit to court.

So, you're saying that the decision was not even discussed, contemplated or weighed, it was just because some broad decided to take it to court? And just when I thought that you were losing your sense of humor, you come through. :LolLolLol

What do I want you to do? I want you to open your mind, get off your highhorse and use your common sense regarding the subject about which we are supposed to be posting.

You're the one on the highhorse GrandMaMa. I think it's time you come down a notch.

Patrick, Patrick, Patrick, you did it again. You made a statement as fact which is not even in the ballpark with the truth. Roe V Wade was argued on two seperate dates, December 13, 1971 and October 11, 1972
and then the opinion was handed down January 22, 1973. The Hippocratic oath was updated nine years prior by Louis Lasagna in 1964.

Must I say, who gives a freakin damn.

That's exactly what I'm doing.

Thanks. Good day.


Now, now Patrick, don't get your panties in a wad, we are just gaining some ground in the world of common sense.

Now, now Patrick, don't get your panties in a wad, we are just gaining some ground in the world of common sense.

You're definitely no where close to that.

[quote=Patrick]

So, you're saying that the decision was not even discussed, contemplated or weighed, it was just because some broad decided to take it to court? And just when I thought that you were losing your sense of humor, you come through. :LolLolLol

It was discussed among the court members at the time, but was not univsersally accepted by all Americans. The majority of Americans still oppose abortion in its current form.

Must I say, who gives a freakin damn.


Jack, is that why you accept the King James version of what is supposed to be the holy word as fact, you don't care about facts? What I just said was a fact, does that not mean anything to you or are you just so wrapped up in blindly believing in SOMETHING, that you are willing to lay your commmon sense at the doorstep and follow blindly, fact or fiction?

Jack, is that why you accept the King James version of what is supposed to be the holy word as fact, you don't care about facts? What I just said was a fact, does that not mean anything to you or are you just so wrapped up in blindly believing in SOMETHING, that you are willing to lay your commmon sense at the doorstep and follow blindly, fact or fiction?

What in the hell does all of this have to do with abortion in SD? Looks like you're the one with no common sense. If you had common sense, you would've realized long ago you were off topic. You've hijacked this thread a long time ago.

You're the one on the highhorse GrandMaMa. I think it's time you come down a notch.

Why, because I'm not afraid or too embarrassed to call a spade a spade?

By the way, in case you didn't know, free speech is allowed on a public forum like this. People like Patrick and I can make any statement we want regardless of if we have the facts to back it up. Why should I care about what you have to say? At least we care enough about this site to shell out a few bocks to help run it. You can't even do that.

Why, because I'm not afraid or too embarrassed to call a spade a spade?

Because you think you're the king of all knowledge and you're never wrong. You always have the facts and that means people like Patrick and I are always below you.

Maybe you need to get a little common sense and learn what the phrase "common sense" means.

What in the hell does all of this have to do with abortion in SD? Looks like you're the one with no common sense. If you had common sense, you would've realized long ago you were off topic. You've hijacked this thread a long time ago.

Does having an answer to each question that someone asks me called hijacking? I was conversering with you on another thread, duh. I am not off topic, you are off thread..among other things

Jack, is that why you accept the King James version of what is supposed to be the holy word as fact, you don't care about facts? What I just said was a fact, does that not mean anything to you or are you just so wrapped up in blindly believing in SOMETHING, that you are willing to lay your commmon sense at the doorstep and follow blindly, fact or fiction?

And what I said was fact. You have an abortion, you're going to Hell unless you turn from your sins.

Because you think you're the king of all knowledge and you're never wrong. You always have the facts and that means people like Patrick and I are always below you.

Maybe you need to get a little common sense and learn what the phrase "common sense" means.

Isn't it a bitch when you think you are standing on a rock and you realize you are seeing the sand slide away?

Does having an answer to each question that someone asks me called hijacking? I was conversering with you on another thread, duh. I am not off topic, you are off thread..among other things

GrandMaMa, use some common sense, and open your eyes. This thread has absolutely nothing to do with the King James Version Bible. That was discussed in another thread. This thread is discussing abortion, without the religious aspect.

Isn't it a bitch when you think you are standing on a rock and you realize you are seeing the sand slide away?

Yup, exactly what's happening to you as we speak.

And what I said was fact. You have an abortion, you're going to Hell unless you turn from your sins.

Call it a chicken all you want, it is still a duck

Yup, exactly what's happening to you as we speak.

Let's leave the arena of insults, Jack...It's pointless and is proving nothing

Call it a chicken all you want, it is still a duck

You make absolutely no sense.

Let's leave the arena of insults, Jack...It's pointless and is proving nothing

Hey, you started this trash, by insulting another member of this forum. I'm just jumping in to defend a cause.

Are you rewriting the Hippocratic oath now, Jack?

Nope, actually most medical schools aren't even using the Hippocatic oath anymore. Most of the newer oaths contain the phrase that was mentioned.

Call it a chicken all you want, it is still a duck

Jack, if you have nothing intelligent to add to the thread, why bother?

Jack, if you have nothing intelligent to add to the thread, why bother?

Heck, you've wasted just as many posts adding absolutely nothing as well.

Besides, I don't think anyone around here really cares what you think anyways. Shoot, I question your altruisim, as you don't even support this site.

Nope, actually most medical schools aren't even using the Hippocatic oath anymore. Most of the newer oaths contain the phrase that was mentioned.

Jack, that is exactly what Patrick and I just said, and that is what got you all stirred up about saving or taking of a life...maybe you should just take a deep breath, and to back and read all of the posts to see what was said and what you said.

Heck, you've wasted just as many posts adding absolutely nothing as well.

Besides, I don't think anyone around here really cares what you think anyways. Shoot, I question your altruisim, as you don't even support this site.

I am sincere about my posts and don't consider them wasted :backtotop

I am sincere about my posts and don't consider them wasted :backtotop

I see you missed my last statement. Open your eyes dude.

Support this site and then maybe I'll actually give a damn what you have to say.

You're definitely no where close to that.

Jack, are you so inadequate when it comes to debating your opinion, that you have to stoop to ATTEMPTED personal attacts?

I see you missed my last statement. Open your eyes dude.

Support this site and then maybe I'll actually give a damn what you have to say.

I must say, you are pretty desperate to discredit anything that I say.

I must say, you are pretty desperate to discredit anything that I say.

That's because you think you know it all, right? Well guess what, you don't know it all.

Jack, are you so inadequate when it comes to debating your opinion, that you have to stoop to ATTEMPTED personal attacts?

You're the one that started this. Saying someone didn't have any common sense, was on their high horse, etc. I don't put up with that crap from anyone.

By the way, I like the way you again dodged my statement about being a supporter.

That's because you think you know it all, right? Well guess what, you don't know it all.

That's what really pisses you off Jack, isn't it? The fact that I have NEVER claimed to know it all, I have just questioned the fact that you do.

By the way, I like the way you again dodged my statement about being a supporter.

What does that have to do with anything? I didn't think that it was worthy of a response and still don't

Ummmmm. Read post #152 above. You stated, "I must say, you are pretty desperate to discredit anything that I say. " You said that as if you're Mr. Right on everything. If that isn't true, why shouldn't I discredit what you say?

You're the one that started this. Saying someone didn't have any common sense, was on their high horse, etc. I don't put up with that crap from anyone.

Jack, You and I know and Patrick knows that I was not talking to you when I said that...isn't it past your bedtime?

What does that have to do with anything? I didn't think that it was worthy of a response and still don't

Obviously you must not think much of this site.

Jack, You and I know and Patrick knows that I was not talking to you when I said that...isn't it past your bedtime?


Keep the personal attacks coming. I love it.

Ummmmm. Read post #152 above. You stated, "I must say, you are pretty desperate to discredit anything that I say. " You said that as if you're Mr. Right on everything. If that isn't true, why shouldn't I discredit what you say?

That would be Ms Right to you

Jack, You and I know and Patrick knows that I was not talking to you when I said that...isn't it past your bedtime?

I've already reported this post to the moderators. That was a direct attack on Patrick, and I'm not going to put up with that garbage on this site, especially after I've invested money here.

That would be Ms Right to you

Whatever.

I've already reported this post to the moderators. That was a direct attack on Patrick, and I'm not going to put up with that garbage on this site, especially after I've invested money here.

When would the direct attack have been, Jack...could it be......maybe, when I called him out when he stated fiction for fact?

You said he had no common sense, was on his high horse, etc. Sounds pretty insulting to me.

Keep the personal attacks coming. I love it.

You must, you keep asking for it...oh, by the way, what kind of BIG INVESTMENT in this website are you referring to?

I'm a Premium Member. I paid my dues. Something you haven't done.

You said he had no common sense, was on his high horse, etc. Sounds pretty insulting to me.

He is the one that asked me what I wanted him to do, I honestly answered him...not you, it was not directed at you...and when someone attempts to represent himself as something he is not, I don't think there is anything wrong with calling him on it. I didn't and I don't.

He is the one that asked me what I wanted him to do, I honestly answered him...not you, it was not directed at you...and when someone attempts to represent himself as something he is not, I don't think there is anything wrong with calling him on it. I didn't and I don't.

How was he representing himself as something he is not?

How was he representing himself as something he is not?

If you don't have the interest it takes to go back and read the posts, all of them, then why should I try to explain it to you? I have no idea why you jumped on my back, I was talking to you about something totally different.

If you don't have the interest it takes to go back and read the posts, all of them, then why should I try to explain it to you? I have no idea why you jumped on my back, I was talking to you about something totally different.

Because I'm not going to allow someone on this site to jump on another member.

I read the posts. He stated that he was a medical student who had visited an abortion clinic.

I'm a Premium Member. I paid my dues. Something you haven't done.

So what, how does that apply?

Because I'm not going to allow someone on this site to jump on another member.

I read the posts. He stated that he was a medical student who had visited an abortion clinic.

And????????

So what, how does that apply?

Come on, you have the common sense to figure this one out.
You asked me: "oh, by the way, what kind of BIG INVESTMENT in this website are you referring to?" So I answered your question.

And????????

And what?

Come on, you have the common sense to figure this one out.
You asked me: "oh, by the way, what kind of BIG INVESTMENT in this website are you referring to?" So I answered your question.

Actually, I don't know how much of a huge investment to which you are referring.

Actually, I don't know how much of a huge investment to which you are referring.

A bigger investment then you. Your investment: $0

And????????

Still waiting for an answer here.

A bigger investment then you. Your investment: $0

Well, it looks like I have gotten my money's worth