The only OTA proposal I heard about a turnpike connecting with i35 was the original Kirkpatrick Turnpike extension plan considered it extending going south of the airport, turning southeast before the Canadian River and connect with i35 around Flood Ave. Though that plan stalled for a couple decades before it got the current funding to Airport Road, it still mostly follows that section of the plan other than where some housing had been built it now routes around, but who knows if the rest is still something they may want to do in the future.

It so NOT closely follows the old planned route that they are rebuilding part of the existing turnpike to accommodate the new route. The southern extension, at least on the west side, is dead. We'll see what happens on the east side, if they're going to plan for the future or just sit around and wait for development to take away the land.

It so NOT closely follows the old planned route that they are rebuilding part of the existing turnpike to accommodate the new route. The southern extension, at least on the west side, is dead. We'll see what happens on the east side, if they're going to plan for the future or just sit around and wait for development to take away the land.

That end is the primary place it deviates from the old concept, an it only varies by at most a half mile from the old preliminary route. The segment still connects roughly the same two juncture points, but due to the city allowing poorly placed housing will require maybe 20 seconds more to drive the whole distance.

That end is the primary place it deviates from the old concept, an it only varies by at most a half mile from the old preliminary route. The segment still connects roughly the same two juncture points, but due to the city allowing poorly placed housing will require maybe 20 seconds more to drive the whole distance.

You're the first I've seen that hasn't 'known' for 20 years the route was going to be go down Sara, merge with SH4, and go down to SH9 (using the existing turnpike). What route do you believe was originally planned?

So I finally just decided to call the OTA and see what’s up with their bs social media tactics and I was informed they will in fact widen the freeway to six lanes and reconstruct the bridges. I’m not sure about SW extension but I believe it too will be 3 lanes. I know for sure now that from I-40 to the recently expanded portion will be 6 lanes.

More lanes is always a great thing and the fact that the bridges will be reconstructed to provide a smooth ride fixing the original f@ck up will be amazing. I can only imagine they will add median lighting as well.

This will be a nice stretch of freeways in the immediate area with the recently constructed I-40. Now we just need to fix the interchange and get rid of goddamn cloverleafs!

PS, the people who helped me were very nice and filed a report to see why I was blocked from OTA Facebook page. Perhaps in the future I will just call them instead as people tend to act different on the phone or in person VS over the internet.

So I finally just decided to call the OTA and see what’s up with their bs social media tactics and I was informed they will in fact widen the freeway to six lanes and reconstruct the bridges. I’m not sure about SW extension but I believe it too will be 3 lanes. I know for sure now that from I-40 to the recently expanded portion will be 6 lanes.

More lanes is always a great thing and the fact that the bridges will be reconstructed to provide a smooth ride fixing the original f@ck up will be amazing. I can only imagine they will add median lighting as well.

This will be a nice stretch of freeways in the immediate area with the recently constructed I-40. Now we just need to fix the interchange and get rid of goddamn cloverleafs!

PS, the people who helped me were very nice and filed a report to see why I was blocked from OTA Facebook page. Perhaps in the future I will just call them instead as people tend to act different on the phone or in person VS over the internet.

I’ve had good luck with email with OTA. Always courteous and respond fast

I’ve had good luck with email with OTA. Always courteous and respond fast
The people I spoke with on the phone were lovely. Very helpful and knowledgeable. OTA and OkDOT are the only agencies I’ve ever had an issue with. I am in contact with tons of others and have no issue with them.

As I said I filed a report and they are ‘investigating’ why I was blocked and will be getting back to me. All I did was politely ask what this construction was about as its scope. I was promptly blocked thereafter. The gentleman on the phone explained it to me in literally 30 seconds. It’s incredible that all of this has happened starting 3 weeks ago.

It’s not that big of a deal really, but I am a very curious person about all things and I do know want to know what the problem was. Either way, I’m excited about this project.

PS, I don’t think I’ve emailed them before but I’m not sure. I’ve almost always emailed ODOT but I usually would Facebook message OTA for some reason.

I’ll probably email them about the direct connector project at SH-74 and see what they say.

I drove to Tulsa on Tuesday and some of the first 3-lane sections are operational and I have to say it was pretty darned nice. BUT, you STILL have slow-going folks that hang out in the far left lane, AND you will still have 3 trucks side-by-side-by-side trying to pass each other going up a hill slowing everybody down (saw that myself this time around), I really hope they add a "no trucks left lane" sign...

...I really hope they add a "no trucks left lane" sign...

I wouldn't be terribly surprised if they do add that once the project is finished or further along than it is now.

I honestly didn't think it was quite this close to being ready, but guess it was.

https://kfor.com/2019/01/09/construction-crews-open-portion-of-new-kilpatrick-turnpike-extension/

I honestly didn't think it was quite this close to being ready, but guess it was.

https://kfor.com/2019/01/09/construction-crews-open-portion-of-new-kilpatrick-turnpike-extension/

I can't wait until I can continue past SW 15th St. With the school right there, the traffic backs up a lot during the morning and after school hours. Now, if you are heading east you are forced to go through the school zone. Congrats to those who need to go west from there though. I'm sure it's a lot better for them now.

These are from about a month ago.

First is for the west turnpike; next two are the east pike.

http://www.okctalk.com/images/pete/westpike012919a.jpg


http://www.okctalk.com/images/pete/eastpike1.jpg


http://www.okctalk.com/images/pete/eastpike2.jpg

Very exciting to see new facilities being built in OKC. Did google maps update their imagery?

Very exciting to see new facilities being built in OKC. Did google maps update their imagery?

Nope, from the OK County Assessor site.

That’s impressive they have more updated imagery. Thanks for sharing I enjoy seeing the updates to our city on the map. It’s my favorite thing on this site next to your drone pics Pete.

OTA is getting closer to finishing to SW Kilpatrick Extension:


Extending the John Kilpatrick Turnpike through the Mustang area is painful now, but the relief is coming, an Oklahoma Turnpike Authority representative said.


The bottleneck where the existing John Kilpatrick Turnpike feeds onto SW 15 Street – west of Mustang Creek Elementary and Mustang North Middle School – will open up in April or May, said Joe Echelle, assistant to the authority’s executive director. Photo/Chris Eversole

https://www.theyukonreview.com/2019/02/14/turnpike-project-to-provide-relief-to-sw-15th-street-bottleneck/

Widening Sara RD. to four lanes seems to be a joint project from SW 29th to SH-152


The turnpike extension project will be accompanied by a widening of Sara Road from just north of SW 29th Street to State Highway 152.

The Sara Road project is jointly funded by the turnpike authority, the city of Oklahoma City and the city of Mustang.

Land is being purchased for the Sara Road project, and construction will begin after all of the land is bought, Echelle said.

- https://www.theyukonreview.com/2019/02/14/turnpike-project-to-provide-relief-to-sw-15th-street-bottleneck/

Here's an update report of each section including EOC:

https://i.imgur.com/YaXE1pA.png

https://i.imgur.com/JlGLuwU.png

Note that the "JKT-2344 2018 Bridge Rehabilitation North CanadianRiver Bridges and Overflow Bridges " from my understanding is a reconstruction of those bridges and widening of Kilpatrick Turnpike to six lanes from I-40 to Rockwell where the current freeway narrows from six to four lanes.

- https://www.pikepass.com/pdf/Project%20Status%20Update.pdf

My opinion: it seems OTA is maxed out on the bonds they can issue and will need to retire or increase their cap to issue more. It would however, be nice to see a full beltway around OKC. Begin construction shortly after these projects are completed around Norman, Edmond, and connecting SH-152 to HE Bailey Spur and to I-35; at least plan and secure ROW. Likewise, I hope these current improvements and any proposed freeways include enough ROW to be widened at minimum 12 lanes-- which should not be needed for awhile.

OkDOT needs to get on the ball with building multiple new freeways in OKC including an extension of DR. WK Jackson(I-44) to the future EOC and rerouting I-44 off of I-35. With these projects and a citywide BRT/Light-rail system, OKC could position itself to immune to major traffic issues many major metros have found themselves in. The city is blessed to have built virtually every major freeway it wanted with the exception of the Sooner Freeway, hopefully they stay ahead of the curve.

OTA is getting closer to finishing to SW Kilpatrick Extension:
OkDOT needs to get on the ball with building multiple new freeways in OKC including an extension of DR. WK Jackson(I-44) to the future EOC and rerouting I-44 off of I-35. With these projects and a citywide BRT/Light-rail system, OKC could position itself to immune to major traffic issues many major metros have found themselves in. The city is blessed to have built virtually every major freeway it wanted with the exception of the Sooner Freeway, hopefully they stay ahead of the curve.

NW Expressway. I could never figure out why that didn't become a freeway as they reserved large chunks of ROW for interchanges.

NW Expressway. I could never figure out why that didn't become a freeway as they reserved large chunks of ROW for interchanges.

I think could OkDOT still has time to preserve ROW for a freeway conversion on NWE northwest of Kilpatrick. At this point I just wish Northwest Expressway would be converted into more of an expressway for cars and less of a city street. With the transfer of the facility to the city of Oklahoma City, that prospect doesn't look good. Grade separated interchanges at most mile marker roads would be super beneficial with the removal of all other lights and U turns added half mile.

I would still like to see 39th "Expressway" converted to a below grade freeway and there is room to make it work with a cut and cover through downtown Bethany which could be a catalyst for development in the area having a new capped park and increased mobility, the only issue would come about around Lake Overholser which has homes and businesses that would have to go and on top of that there is an environmentally sensitive area which would make the dream all the more harder to bring to reality. That project would likely be in the billions.

A couple other things I'd like to see that are almost certainly not happening is the Sooner freeway revived to Norman as an I-35 relief route which could be OKC's version of the North Dallas Tollway which is crammed tightly through residential areas. Look at the street if neighborhood access is modified it seems the hardest parts would be requiring a lot of room for an interchange at I-40 which on top of all of the other hard squeezes would all but surely kill this project. Then you have residential development at I-240 would likely stop even a modest upgrade of six lanes from happening let alone a freeway.

Then I would also like to see a freeway between Canadian River and SH-37.

Though even without those crazy ideas, you could still stand to be prepared if the city would get on the ball with better planning efforts. I don't see OKC ever becoming as transit oriented as some posters here think it will and the city could run into some serious traffic problems down the road if the city continues to sprawl with no planning for freeway facilities. Red tape and high housing prices has made the old glory days of just ringing in the bulldozers to make way a thing of the past. The larger cities like Seattle and Boston have made other cities wary about going through with complex facilities found in Europe and many other places where building large freeway tunnels through urban areas is common. The monetary cost is high, but well worth it, IMO. I don't think we'll even be seeing something the LBJ expansion complexity in OKC for awhile. We still don't even have a five stack whereas Amarillo seems to be getting two, IIRC.

NW Expressway. I could never figure out why that didn't become a freeway as they reserved large chunks of ROW for interchanges.

From what I have heard they wanted to leave the option open in the future but did not have the money to build it as a freeway at the time and there was never anyone with the political clout pushing hard for it to be constructed that way. After that though in some ways it probably gets more difficult to happen, since it has been constructed there have been more projects in need of funding than there is transportation funding and now there probably local groups that will push back against the conversion even if we had the money and nothing higher priority than it.

I really wish OKC would consider a serious investment in North West Expressway.

True rapid transit light-rail(NOT A F#*$*#NG STREETCAR!!!) which would be double tracked and grade separated in many areas. Normally I'd call for entire grade separation but I don't think the city is anywhere close to warranting that yet. I'd have this run from downtown running from the Santa Fe Station which would be an elevated platform going to Reno which would loose two lanes and continue to Classen. Then it would follow roughly along Classen grade separated in high trafficked taking a lane of Classen in each direction then going down NWE with major stops at Penn Square/Penn Central(future development) to Baptist Hospital. The rail ends there with a future expansion down NWE when warranted.

Then continue with BRT down NWE to Kilpatrick Turnpike. Preserve ROW north west of the toll road for a future expansion to a freeway. Remove almost every stop light where feasible and place u turn areas for local access. Unfortunately it's pretty tight so I don't lights being removed at mile marker roads but perhaps tolled flyovers over major intersections could be constructed as time goes that buses could use and motorist could pay a fee which could fund free BRT service.

So what is the timeframe it looks like they will complete the SW extension to the Kilpatrick? It is coming along faster than I anticipated, but it doesn't exactly look close to open according to those images.

So what is the timeframe it looks like they will complete the SW extension to the Kilpatrick? It is coming along faster than I anticipated, but it doesn't exactly look close to open according to those images.

While sections of it will open at various times, if you're talking completely complete, I believe the timeline is next year.

So what is the timeframe it looks like they will complete the SW extension to the Kilpatrick? It is coming along faster than I anticipated, but it doesn't exactly look close to open according to those images.
According to the project website the goal is to have every intitiave completed by 2021. I suspect the SW Kilpatrick Ext. will be open in 2020 as Stile said.

I think could OkDOT still has time to preserve ROW for a freeway conversion on NWE northwest of Kilpatrick. At this point I just wish Northwest Expressway would be converted into more of an expressway for cars and less of a city street. With the transfer of the facility to the city of Oklahoma City, that prospect doesn't look good. Grade separated interchanges at most mile marker roads would be super beneficial with the removal of all other lights and U turns added half mile.

I would still like to see 39th "Expressway" converted to a below grade freeway and there is room to make it work with a cut and cover through downtown Bethany which could be a catalyst for development in the area having a new capped park and increased mobility, the only issue would come about around Lake Overholser which has homes and businesses that would have to go and on top of that there is an environmentally sensitive area which would make the dream all the more harder to bring to reality. That project would likely be in the billions.

A couple other things I'd like to see that are almost certainly not happening is the Sooner freeway revived to Norman as an I-35 relief route which could be OKC's version of the North Dallas Tollway which is crammed tightly through residential areas. Look at the street if neighborhood access is modified it seems the hardest parts would be requiring a lot of room for an interchange at I-40 which on top of all of the other hard squeezes would all but surely kill this project. Then you have residential development at I-240 would likely stop even a modest upgrade of six lanes from happening let alone a freeway.

Then I would also like to see a freeway between Canadian River and SH-37.

Though even without those crazy ideas, you could still stand to be prepared if the city would get on the ball with better planning efforts. I don't see OKC ever becoming as transit oriented as some posters here think it will and the city could run into some serious traffic problems down the road if the city continues to sprawl with no planning for freeway facilities. Red tape and high housing prices has made the old glory days of just ringing in the bulldozers to make way a thing of the past. The larger cities like Seattle and Boston have made other cities wary about going through with complex facilities found in Europe and many other places where building large freeway tunnels through urban areas is common. The monetary cost is high, but well worth it, IMO. I don't think we'll even be seeing something the LBJ expansion complexity in OKC for awhile. We still don't even have a five stack whereas Amarillo seems to be getting two, IIRC.

Dude, OKC doesn't have enough money to keep lane markings painted (there's probably 500 miles of streets in need of new lane striping), or to fix the thousands of potholes or hundreds of miles of massively beat up streets (Better Streets initiative goes a way towards this, but not enough, most likely). Most of the things you would like OKC to do will never, ever, ever happen, but keep dreaming, don't want to dissuade you from that, but it's just not practical...

^^^ trust me, I’m well aware.

OTA is getting closer to finishing to SW Kilpatrick Extension:



Note that the "JKT-2344 2018 Bridge Rehabilitation North CanadianRiver Bridges and Overflow Bridges " from my understanding is a reconstruction of those bridges and widening of Kilpatrick Turnpike to six lanes from I-40 to Rockwell where the current freeway narrows from six to four lanes.

.

I think the widening is to just north of the Canadian River from what i remember on the plans. Based on the project cost i don't imagine that will stretch all the way to Rockwell.

I think the widening is to just north of the Canadian River from what i remember on the plans. Based on the project cost i don't imagine that will stretch all the way to Rockwell.
I had called in and they told me it was all the way to the Rockwell and I thought that seemed a bit much for 50 million. Maybe I misunderstood.

It's actually to MacArthur. If you look at what would need to be done, there are bridges just east of Council that would need to be widened as well bridges over NW 10th, 36th, 39th streets and NW Expressway. Add in about 11 miles of 2 new lanes and associated jersey barrier and I just can't see how they could do that for $50 million.

I’m rather skeptical about any widening but at this point I’m just going to wait to the end product. I suspect if the area isn’t widened it will be in the not so distant future.

It's actually to MacArthur. If you look at what would need to be done, there are bridges just east of Council that would need to be widened as well bridges over NW 10th, 36th, 39th streets and NW Expressway. Add in about 11 miles of 2 new lanes and associated jersey barrier and I just can't see how they could do that for $50 million.

Any way to find out how much spend about 5 years ago when they widened from 35 to MacArthur?

It's actually to MacArthur. If you look at what would need to be done, there are bridges just east of Council that would need to be widened as well bridges over NW 10th, 36th, 39th streets and NW Expressway. Add in about 11 miles of 2 new lanes and associated jersey barrier and I just can't see how they could do that for $50 million.

At that cost it's a reasonable assumption that they have to redo grade and drainage as well.

Any way to find out how much spend about 5 years ago when they widened from 35 to MacArthur?But they DIDN'T widen it all the way to I-35, it only goes to Eastern/Boulevard. Why they didn't do the final 2.5 miles east to I-35 I don't know. Also, I don't know why there aren't on/off ramps at Bryant either.

After this SW Kilpatrick extension is completed my highest priority wish list will be reduced to Bryant Ave on/off ramps and a way to get from the SW Extension to I-44 at the HE Bailey Spur without getting on Airport Road and taking I-44 down to Newcastle. All my trips b/w Edmond and Lawton would be much easier. Of secondary priority is widening an non-widened part of the Kilpatrick.

Any way to find out how much spend about 5 years ago when they widened from 35 to MacArthur?

According to their website:

3/8/2012, a contract (JKT-2221) for $54,821,199.50 was awarded to a consortium headed by Duit Construction. It can be assumed this is the right one as there are no other contracts for the KIlpatrick for an amount large enought to have been it.

Details are no longer available on their website, but the work covered 8 miles (from Eastern west to MacArthur). Overpass widenings at Kelley, US77, Western, Penn, Portland, Meridian, and Bluff Creek plus essentially a complete rebuild of the BNSF overpass just west of Broadway Extension and the new center pier, beams and decking at the westbound JKT to southbound Hefner Parkway flyover. Full Jersey barrier the entire length, new lighting, new BGS's. I'm surprised all of this could be done for that amount. I will keep digging.

EDIT
The Creek contract was awarded the same day for $58 million to Sherwood Construction. The Arkansas River bridges would be the reason for the difference.

Taken 2/14. Looking SE towards I-40

15158

The number one priority for the Kilpatrick is to fix the highway 74 interchange mess! I just don't understand why they make us go thru traffic lights!!...stupid, stupid, stupid! sorry for the rant.

The number one priority for the Kilpatrick is to fix the highway 74 interchange mess! I just don't understand why they make us go thru traffic lights!!...stupid, stupid, stupid! sorry for the rant.

Absolutely right!

The number one priority for the Kilpatrick is to fix the highway 74 interchange mess! I just don't understand why they make us go thru traffic lights!!...stupid, stupid, stupid! sorry for the rant.

Agree. Also, when they were widening between Eastern and Rockwell why did they not do all the way to 35 and 40? The growth data was there to justify it.

With Paycom growth the city and turnpike need to fix this area or it will be traffic nightmare. They need to build in Cali uturns on the overpasses as well, so traffic can get to other side without lights. Memorial needs widened too. We had a chance to get ahead of growth yet chose not to. Paycom is a huge company and still growing. We need to protect it or maybe someday they decide city doesn’t care about their corp taxes. If workers can’t get in out of work that is quality of life to those people. If they see all the money spent on streetcar and downtown projects and no city help with basic road needs thats not good long term for business.

We need to address all these road issues before talking caps and aquariums and other pet projects. Paycom alone has what over 3,000 workers? Then the ripple jobs and businesses. And right now we have a turnpike right outside its doors yet it takes 15-20 minutes to get to it because of other roads lacking.

Roads are a huge problem here. Still waiting for many more needing resurfaced. No right turn lanes on most 4 lane roads either. Our road system is still a mess. Just wait til Costco opens and that road system is a mess too. Two large economic areas on other ends of turnpike and both are a mess. But you can go wait 20-30 minutes for a SC ride.

The number one priority for the Kilpatrick is to fix the highway 74 interchange mess! I just don't understand why they make us go thru traffic lights!!...stupid, stupid, stupid! sorry for the rant.

From what I've heard, this has been in the plan for sometime, but last year the engineer's estimate came in about 50% over budget so it had to be put on hold.

Yes, I avoid Memorial like the plague. I think just some simple light timing adjustments would greatly benefit each intersection along there. For example if you are waiting to turn left onto May from WB Memorial you will sit through a red light. Once it turns green and you finally get to turn left you get to stop again for all the EB Memorial traffic...and that's IF you get to turn because there's already a backup there because of the traffic that got stopped there from SB. Then you get to sit there and stare at the opposite traffic right there over the bridge because the opposite traffic is experiencing the same exact locked pattern. And this same exact scenario is at all of our highway/side road intersections in the city. I frequent NW Expressway and Hefner Parkway and you have to sit through both lights in order to proceed with your turn. When you have sat through a light waiting to turn left, once you finally go and you get to the other light on the other side of the bridge, it should be green for traffic to proceed not to come to another stop for another cycle. It's just insane! I also think that minor adjustments in traffic signals could take away some of the road rage that takes place. City traffic engineers need to simply go to the Dallas area to see how they manage their highway/side road intersections to see how some easy changes in the traffic lights will better keep traffic moving. Dallas has a heck of a lot of traffic but these intersections are not gridlocked.

Sorry for the rant, but traffic here has just made me so dang mad over the course of the 20 years I've lived here after moving here from the Dallas area. I also think we should use some money for these types of traffic improvements. The city and OTA need to come together and come up with options on how to improve the corridor together.

A
With Paycom growth the city and turnpike need to fix this area or it will be traffic nightmare. They need to build in Cali uturns on the overpasses as well, so traffic can get to other side without lights. Memorial needs widened too. We had a chance to get ahead of growth yet chose not to. Paycom is a huge company and still growing. We need to protect it or maybe someday they decide city doesn’t care about their corp taxes. If workers can’t get in out of work that is quality of life to those people. If they see all the money spent on streetcar and downtown projects and no city help with basic road needs thats not good long term for business.


You're right, but the Paycom folks have got it pretty good for now with traffic cops directing traffic for them when they get off work. It's frustrating for the rest of us though.

You're right, but the Paycom folks have got it pretty good for now with traffic cops directing traffic for them when they get off work. It's frustrating for the rest of us though.

They pay the cops to do this every day. At some point we have to invest in helping business out before some other city tried to pay for them moving. Thats the problem we knew it would be busy yet did nothing.

I also think we should use some money for these types of traffic improvements. The city and OTA need to come together and come up with options on how to improve the corridor together.

Edmond has spent millions on an "Intelligent Transportation System" and its been in play for almost three years along 2nd Street from I-35 to Santa Fe.

https://edmondok.com/926/Intelligent-Transportation-Systems

However, the other problem still arises as it does along Memorial Road, there are simply too many vehicles at certain times of the day on road infrastructure that was never designed to handle the vehicle count. Often Dallas is brought up as an example of road design, Memorial Road and Kilpatrick would benefit even from something like Kellogg Avenue in Wichita that divides the city in half and has a plethora of turn-abouts and on-off ramps to aid in traffic flow.

https://kfor.com/2019/04/22/major-changes-ahead-for-service-area-in-stroud-on-turner-turnpike/

Why can't they build it like the Will Rodgers mid way?

https://kfor.com/2019/04/22/major-changes-ahead-for-service-area-in-stroud-on-turner-turnpike/

Why can't they build it like the Will Rodgers mid way?

Probably something to do with cost. There was already a Chandler stop, sounds like their just enlarging that one and physically cutting off access for eastbound traffic to Stroud stop. The article didn't specify if they are also moving westbound traffic so that Stroud stop sits to the north of turnpike.

The way it reads is that the westbound interstate will not curve to the right and will continue straight through the south portion of the rest stop.

I also don’t understand how this will supposedly save people money like in the article.

This idea sounds good to me. Two separate areas one for east and one for west. It allows for uninterrupted fast lane travel

The way it reads is that the westbound interstate will not curve to the right and will continue straight through the south portion of the rest stop.

I also don’t understand how this will supposedly save people money like in the article.

I guess it's not really about saving money. Makes sense now if their removing a dangerous curve. Its about a quarter mile of new road.

The new eastbound service plaza is not where the old one is:

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/33814327748_b61718b8ff.jpg (https://flic.kr/p/Tw4gyQ)

For those who are interested, the plans are at:
https://pikepass.com/pdf/T-MC-128A%20Bid%20Plan%20Set%20with%20disclaimer_285_20 180912153334.pdf

It’s about that one sees bites the dust. She’s served well but is outdated. I’m surprised they kept that one this long.

I hope they design these with a six lane expansion of the mainline in mind.

After they finish six-laning the Tulsa-to-Bristow portion they're planning on six-laning Bristow to OKC, or at least that was my understanding. I can't remember the timeline, sorry.

After they finish six-laning the Tulsa-to-Bristow portion they're planning on six-laning Bristow to OKC, or at least that was my understanding. I can't remember the timeline, sorry.

Thank you for the update. Will there be lighting included? That would be cool if so. Much like how the I-90 Illinois tollway has become an icon for a six lane urban turnpike with lighting in rural areas. It’s a cool sight to see.

There is street lighting from the Bristow interchange to Tulsa, so I am hopeful there will be street lighting down to OKC.

After they finish six-laning the Tulsa-to-Bristow portion they're planning on six-laning Bristow to OKC, or at least that was my understanding. I can't remember the timeline, sorry.

Forget OKC to Bristow, they need to make it 6 lanes from Sapulpa to I-244, then ODOT needs to expand I-244 from 4 to 6 lanes from the I-44 interchange to the Okmulgee Expressway.

I believe widening the turnpike from Sapulpa to I-244 is the next phase of the current construction project.

I believe widening the turnpike from Sapulpa to I-244 is the next phase of the current construction project.

the next phase is 3 lanes each direction from the creek turnpike exit to the end of the turnpike

Aerials from a few weeks ago showing progress on the west and east sections of the turnpike extensions.

http://www.okctalk.com/images/pete/kilpatrickwest042919a.jpg


http://www.okctalk.com/images/pete/kilpatrickeast042919a.jpg

How did you get the latest aerials to show up on the County Assessor page. They had a blurb about it but I couldn't figure out where to go as there was no hyperlink.

Sara Road bridge opened over I-40 the other day.

I’m ready for this to open. It will be a detour to drive home to the deer creek area from near the airport, but I think it will save some time by avoiding the bottlenecks on I-44.

Aerial video tracks progress of the east turnpike:

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=483991112408315

Looks like the north and south ends are a lot further along than the middle. I saw no evidence of any work on the North Canadian River bridge.