Spartan
02-17-2015, 08:19 PM
Just a thought I had while thinking about how public financing has become an entitlement for downtown developers in most cities. When OKC first started using TIFs for downtown development, we gained public spaces like the NE 2nd/Oklahoma plaza, or Maywood Park.
Most states now have the law where 1% of public works projects is spent on public art. If TIF required the same (or maybe 10%), we could get back to the business of placemaking and building more marketable projects and neighborhoods.
We should also establish general standards for projects to get TIF, including perhaps: historic preservation if applicable, visually appealing parking, street level retail, etc. There are probably other ways we could be more strategic with the use of public finance.
Most states now have the law where 1% of public works projects is spent on public art. If TIF required the same (or maybe 10%), we could get back to the business of placemaking and building more marketable projects and neighborhoods.
We should also establish general standards for projects to get TIF, including perhaps: historic preservation if applicable, visually appealing parking, street level retail, etc. There are probably other ways we could be more strategic with the use of public finance.