Restaurants
Bricktown
Current
Lower Bricktown
no



Address: 308 Johnny Bench Drive (http://goo.gl/maps/0iRtm)
Phone: (405) 701-3535
Hours: Mon-Thu 4 pm - 10 pm
Fri-Sat 11 am - 11 pm
Sun 11 am - 10 pm
Development: Lower Bricktown
Status: Opened Dec 2013
Links:
Official Website (http://www.kdsbricktown.com/)
Menu (http://www.kdsbricktown.com/#mainmenu)
Facebook Page (https://www.facebook.com/KDsBricktown?fref=ts)
Yelp (http://www.yelp.com/biz/kds-southern-cuisine-oklahoma-city)
Urban Spoon (http://www.urbanspoon.com/r/46/1779986/restaurant/Arts-District/KDs-Southern-Cuisine-Oklahoma-City)
Eat Around OKC


http://www.okctalk.com/images/pete/kdswiki1.jpg


Information & Latest News
Operated by the Hal Smith Group (http://www.ehsrg.com/)
County Assessor Record (http://www.oklahomacounty.org/assessor/Searches/AN-R.asp?ACCOUNTNO=R131749005)
Gallery

rlimzW465XQ

This is what was supposed to go there:
http://a3.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/56/f0937d3bdac7daade44f693f6d14a3c5/l.jpg

1 story?

Odd.... Steve?

Yes, one story.

And 10,200 square feet is a lot. Toby Keith's is 14,000.

Suburbanization of Bricktown?

perhaps a small dining spot, and an even smaller pub, and a bit of retail? Nice thing about shells, they are flexible little boxes.

Seems like a bit of a waste to only go one story

Seems like a bit of a waste to only go one story

my thoughts as well... i was hoping for at least two stories... but was really thinking a 3/4 story, with the upper level (2 levels if it's 4) be residential, and the lower two floors be low end retail and restaurant

Curious, how is that building in the picture that Nick posted one story? Sure looks two to me.

I read that caption as being "this was what was originally planned"

Curious, how is that building in the picture that Nick posted one story? Sure looks two to me.

It's a fake second story (fake architecture in Bricktown, imagine that). Spring Creek Plaza in Edmond is the same way.

Suburbanization of Bricktown?

It will just be less that has to be torn down when we get around to fixing Lower Bricktown.

Seems like a bit of a waste to only go one story

Do you consider Toby Keith's a waste of space only being one story? Seems pretty successful to me... There wouldn't be much foot traffic on the second floor either, IMO, since the second level from Earl's Rib Palace wouldn't be connected to it. I don't see many people walking up stairs to go to one store...

It's a fake second story (fake architecture in Bricktown, imagine that). Spring Creek Plaza in Edmond is the same way.

So that rendering is still accurate? I just recalled when that was originally proposed in 2008...

Do you consider Toby Keith's a waste of space only being one story? Seems pretty successful to me... There wouldn't be much foot traffic on the second floor either, IMO, since the second level from Earl's Rib Palace wouldn't be connected to it. I don't see many people walking up stairs to go to one store...

The main problem with LB is that the buildings are too wide. Instead of a single building with 100 feet of canal frontage they should of had 5 to 7 individual storefronts covering the same space. The volume should come from depth and height, not width.

Like this except with a canal, not a street.
http://www.hotelinspector.com/philadelphiahotels/viewfromlathamhotel.jpg

Supposedly its another restaurant from the Hal Smith group. Word on the street says its going to be a steak house with another celebrity name attached, but that name hasn't been decided yet.

Do you consider Toby Keith's a waste of space only being one story? Seems pretty successful to me... There wouldn't be much foot traffic on the second floor either, IMO, since the second level from Earl's Rib Palace wouldn't be connected to it. I don't see many people walking up stairs to go to one store...

toby keith's has a second floor ..

Toby Keith's is 26 feet high and this one will be 22.

I wasn't really following the TK Warrior responses, but did that one slip past the general past consensus that TK's I Love This Bar and Grill is in fact precisely a big EIFS waste of space?

toby keith's has a second floor ..

More like a small mezzanine.

Do you consider Toby Keith's a waste of space only being one story? Seems pretty successful to me... There wouldn't be much foot traffic on the second floor either, IMO, since the second level from Earl's Rib Palace wouldn't be connected to it. I don't see many people walking up stairs to go to one store...

Toby Keith's does have a sort of second story but it's a giant themed restaurant that also is a concert hall. So some heighth is needed. And Of course you wouldn't put retail on the second floor of this new building. Office or residential is what the second floor would be used for.
Seems like a waste of canal frontage for wide, expansive, one story, single use buildings to be placed there. But hey, that's just me.

Toby Keith's does have a sort of second story but it's a giant themed restaurant that also is a concert hall. So some heighth is needed. And Of course you wouldn't put retail on the second floor of this new building. Office or residential is what the second floor would be used for.
Seems like a waste of canal frontage for wide, expansive, one story, single use buildings to be placed there. But hey, that's just me.

That's lower bricktown for you. Harkins, Sonic (albeit multi story), Toby Keiths, Bass Pro...

What do any of you guys expect for Lower Bricktown though, honestly?

I'm curious where exactly any of us are getting these expectations that quality development should be happening around downtown. What makes us feel like we have the right to demand development that doesn't harm our public investment in downtown areas? On what basis are we wanting to tell a private property owner what they can do with their property when there isn't even a political will in City Hall or BUDC or DDRC to do so?

This is just the exact same crap from the last 10-20 years. Are you all not just over it by now? Face the facts. Stop pretending this isn't Oklahoma City.

I think this will be nice, but yes, i think thats just wasted space up top. Either a really tall roof, or a big attic.

I think this will be nice, but yes, i think thats just wasted space up top. Either a really tall roof, or a big attic.

It sounds like you're basing this on the rendering that I posted up there. Let me again stress that the above rendering is what was supposed to go on this site. I will be mildly surprised if the above rendering comes to fruition, since I haven't seen any renderings yet actually attached to this building permit application.

The proof will be in the pudding.

What do any of you guys expect for Lower Bricktown though, honestly?

I'm curious where exactly any of us are getting these expectations that quality development should be happening around downtown.

Exactly. As long as suburban OKC continues to build itself around the automobile, we will see half-baked attempts at downtown development. Although lately, we have been getting better developments....

Without sending this thread off on a tangent, Bricktown's success and uphill struggle is it's tourism. We could probably get better development if it weren't for the tourist aspect and creating parking spaces for all of those tourists. But Bricktown's lifeline is also it's tourist traffic.

Bricktown is good, I just think it could be a lot better.

I was really hoping for a new parking lot at this location.

I was really hoping for a Toby Keith's I Love This Town and Parking.

You all are on the right track with a new restaurant...

You all are on the right track with a new restaurant...

How about Tim McGraw's Hee-Haw Saloon and I Love My Bar Even More Than That Other Washout?

I was really hoping for a new parking lot at this location.

Ha! Give USA Screenprinting a call!

The reality is that there is really NO WAY to urbanize lower bricktown at this point without a complete overhaul. That section of the canal has been totally wasted. At the end of the day, as long as it isn't surface parking, filling that lot is good. What's interesting, is that this is IT for lower bricktown. Nothing more can be added without rethinking the parking layout. The problem is though that it has been so poorly developed that I doubt any demand significant enough to rethink it will ever surface. This will be built and then it will pretty much have to wallow in mediocrity until it gets to the point where it has to be put to sleep and re-imagined. However, even that is predicated in bricktown proper getting it stuff together, filling up the canal spaces and stop wasting its available development space on more surface parking.

Soon though, we'll start to see more demand influence from residents from deep deuce. If bricktown is to have a development resurgence, that will be the key, imo.

Ha! Give USA Screenprinting a call!

The reality is that there is really NO WAY to urbanize lower bricktown at this point without a complete overhaul. That section of the canal has been totally wasted. At the end of the day, as long as it isn't surface parking, filling that lot is good. What's interesting, is that this is IT for lower bricktown. Nothing more can be added without rethinking the parking layout. The problem is though that it has been so poorly developed that I doubt any demand significant enough to rethink it will ever surface. This will be built and then it will pretty much have to wallow in mediocrity until it gets to the point where it has to be put to sleep and re-imagined. However, even that is predicated in bricktown proper getting it stuff together, filling up the canal spaces and stop wasting its available development space on more surface parking.

Soon though, we'll start to see more demand influence from residents from deep deuce. If bricktown is to have a development resurgence, that will be the key, imo.

I agree with this. Looking at satellite pictures, it's difficult to fill lower bricktown in anymore....which is a shame with how much space is there. The layout destroys most reasonable ideas to fill it in. We need a creative solution.

Spartan, not just this thread, but is OKC Talk your favorite place to vent vitriol? Really, fellas. The only way to develop LBT, CBD, DD, SOSA, MOUSE, etc the way you want is to scrap capitalism completely, turn OKC into a city state and then nationalize everything to develop it just the way you want it. Should you like the way a free-market economy takes your favorite district? Not necessarily, and I agree that some restrictions should be placed on development in concert with a well-thought out plan. Sim City, now, THAT is the way to make sure you get just development you want, eh?

Toby Keiths looks like a 2 story building from the outside, but it is largely a tall one-story on the inside (with the exception of Mr. Keith's private dining space behind the bar/above the kitchen area

Toby Keiths looks like a 2 story building from the outside, but it is largely a tall one-story on the inside (with the exception of Mr. Keith's private dining space behind the bar/above the kitchen area

not a private dining space .(it is used for parties) but is also used daily

Spartan, not just this thread, but is OKC Talk your favorite place to vent vitriol? Really, fellas. The only way to develop LBT, CBD, DD, SOSA, MOUSE, etc the way you want is to scrap capitalism completely, turn OKC into a city state and then nationalize everything to develop it just the way you want it. Should you like the way a free-market economy takes your favorite district? Not necessarily, and I agree that some restrictions should be placed on development in concert with a well-thought out plan. Sim City, now, THAT is the way to make sure you get just development you want, eh?

Not at all, Dubya. In fact today I'm having a change of heart, if you can't tell from my questioning of these people's unreasonable ideas. I think we need more free market in Bricktown development, and the only way we can get that is with lower expectations, lower standards, and lower results. Vote for me.

Spartan, not just this thread, but is OKC Talk your favorite place to vent vitriol? Really, fellas. The only way to develop LBT, CBD, DD, SOSA, MOUSE, etc the way you want is to scrap capitalism completely, turn OKC into a city state and then nationalize everything to develop it just the way you want it. Should you like the way a free-market economy takes your favorite district? Not necessarily, and I agree that some restrictions should be placed on development in concert with a well-thought out plan. Sim City, now, THAT is the way to make sure you get just development you want, eh?

Capitalism built urban environments for years until the 1950's The problem is with the mindset of car. Capitalism works in suburban environments and urban environments. It depends on the vision of the developer. The developers like Richard McKnown (spelling?) understand that a pedestrian friendly mixed-use development can provide good profit opportunities as well as long term advantages. You have developers like Chris Johnson who see that Bricktown has a high number of people visiting it, and decide to build his business there. He just doesn't understand what downtown is about, and just sees potential dollars. I'm sure Chris has good intentions, he just has a different fundamental understanding of downtown. And his development reflects that. We need more developers who understand how downtown environments work , and less who are still stuck in the suburbs trying to get a slice of the pie of downtown, without understanding the difference fully.

Exactly. As long as suburban OKC continues to build itself around the automobile, we will see half-baked attempts at downtown development. Although lately, we have been getting better developments....

Without sending this thread off on a tangent, Bricktown's success and uphill struggle is it's tourism. We could probably get better development if it weren't for the tourist aspect and creating parking spaces for all of those tourists. But Bricktown's lifeline is also it's tourist traffic.

Bricktown is good, I just think it could be a lot better.
I disagree with the assessment that the big swaths of parking in Bricktown are primarily for "tourists." I interact with tourists, out-of-town business people, Bricktown workers and locals on a daily basis, and have for 10 years. "Tourists" mostly use the district the way many on here would like to see it used; IF THEY ARE IN A CAR AT ALL, they find a parking lot somewhere - anywhere - get out of their cars, and WALK the district. They are now the largest users of the Power Alley garage (hotel guests), followed by Bricktown employees. Locals mostly can't be bothered to use the garage, because they see it as an inconvenience and want surface parking instead.

Many tourists have told me they like downtown OKC and Bricktown specifically because they feel they don't even need a car at all when here.

Tourists are the ONLY people who utilize the trolleys, as far as I can tell. They don't gripe about walking, ever (and also never gripe about paying to park; in fact most of them think it's funny that Okies get riled up over $5 parking).

The giant swaths of parking in Bricktown are there to satisfy suburban OKC visitors who pack the place on weekends and event nights, want parking as close to their venue as possible, of course want this strip-mall style parking for nothing or next to it. They want to roll in for lunch, park a few feet away, and roll right back out. Those are the people who have created the demand, and many of those are the people who have griped about a "lack" of parking for years to anyone who would listen, creating a relatively baseless perception that drove development of even more spaces.

OKC folks should really get over viewing "tourists" or visitors in a negative light. While I agree that "tourist-Y" is not good (we need authenticity in downtown, which oddly enough most tourists would prefer anyway), touristS are just people who drop off new money in our economy without asking that much in return.

not a private dining space .(it is used for parties) but is also used daily
When built, that is what we were told by management...it was private dining space reserved for Mr. Keith and his invited guests. But thanks for the updated info.

Thanks for that post Catch22. I guess the car culture is so ingrained into the general populace that they don't realize capitalism existed centuries before the automobile. If anything, the automobile is the exact opposite of free market. Subsidies for automakers, roads, taxpayer funded traffic enforcement, oil subsidies, wars for oil, cash for clunkers, UAW political influence, etc etc etc... A world has been created since the 1950s that require a car. If you don't think so, try living without one for 7 days. So sit back and enjoy $4 gas - you don't have a choice. So much for free-market.

I disagree with the assessment that the big swaths of parking in Bricktown are primarily for "tourists." I interact with tourists, out-of-town business people, Bricktown workers and locals on a daily basis, and have for 10 years. "Tourists" mostly use the district the way many on here would like to see it used; IF THEY ARE IN A CAR AT ALL, they find a parking lot somewhere, get out of their cars, and WALK the district. They are now the largest users of the Power Alley garage (hotel guests), followed by Bricktown employees. Locals mostly can't be bothered to use the garage, because they see it as an inconvenience and want surface parking.

Many tourists have told me they like downtown OKC and Bricktown specifically because they feel they don't even need a car at all when here.

Tourists are the ONLY people who utilize the trolleys, as far as I can tell. They don't gripe about walking, ever (and also never gripe about paying to park, in fact most of them think it's funny that Okies get riled up over $5 parking).

The giant swaths of parking in Bricktown are there to satisfy suburban OKC visitors who pack the place on weekends and event nights, want parking as close to their venue as possible, of course want this strip-mall style parking for nothing or next to it. Those are the people who have created the demand, and those are the people who have griped about a "lack" of parking for years to anyone who would listen, creating a relatively baseless perception.

OKC folks should really get over viewing "tourists" or visitors in a negative light. While I agree that "tourist-Y" is not good (we need authenticity in downtown, which oddly enough tourists would prefer anyway), touristS are just people who drop off new money in our economy without asking that much in return.
Funny how that "perception" is quickly becoming reality (even the City admits this now in recent articles by Steve)

The parking shortage problem is almost entirely on the other side of the tracks, Larry. There is rarely a shortage of spaces in Bricktown, even on the busiest of nights. Sometimes there is certainly a shortage of just-across-the-street parking, but frankly I'd be happy if it was always that way. That is the sign of a thriving area.

While I would LOVE to see centralized, structured parking added in Bricktown, it would mostly be to consolidate existing spaces, allowing for development of surface lots. The perception that there is a "shortage" in Bricktown is still that; a relatively baseless perception.

I think by 'tourist' catch22 was including anyone who doesn't live/work downtown. A visitor from Edmond is still a tourist in Bricktown.

Not at all, Dubya. In fact today I'm having a change of heart, if you can't tell from my questioning of these people's unreasonable ideas. I think we need more free market in Bricktown development, and the only way we can get that is with lower expectations, lower standards, and lower results. Vote for me.

Spartan, I don't think you should lower your standards -- maybe your volume, though. Just realize that unless you're the developer or city planner who has enacted codes in advance based on a credible plan for the area, you probably don't have a say in what happens there. What you can do is snipe and declare your displeasure on a message board. Yeah, I guess I will vote for you. What are you running for? The OKCTalk Court Jester?

If a certain family would pull a certain part of their body out of another part of their body, this could all be fixed. Flat surface parking should rarely exist in my opinion, for areas like this. Imagine these lots charging $5 - $20 depending on the event and their location, actually building a desired and much needed parking garage, the problem would be solved. End of story.

looks as uninteresting as Toby keiths. I think that building is just horrible looking. so cheap.
if it is only going to be one story and a resteraunt then put a roof top patio on it.. at least that is a bit more interesting.. but for the most part that area of bricktown is not very interesting.. it looks cheap

LBT is so confusing to me. I honestly don't see a long-term vision for it. Not without another MAPS investment. It needs some pretty drastic corrections.

Enter the CAT D8 Urban Do-over Tool (aka The Mulligan). We have had enough half-ass. It is time for some full-ass.

http://www.truck1.eu/img/Construction_machinery_Bulldozer_CAT_D8-ful-2474_9945661058454.jpg

$700,000 building permit today for a 10,200 square foot shell building to be located between Harkins Theater and Toby Keith's on the canal.

Anybody know what this is for?

http://www.oklahomacounty.org/assessor/Searches/sketches/picfile/1612/R131749005001rA.jpg

It's Kevin Durant's new southern cuisine restaurant with a price point slightly higher than Toby Keith's.

We just need to get rid of everything south of Reno save the plaza, The Centennial, Harkins and its accessory building, and... umm. The U-Haul building. I would care less if all the rest went.

I think by 'tourist' catch22 was including anyone who doesn't live/work downtown. A visitor from Edmond is still a tourist in Bricktown.
Yeah, but by that definition most retail/restaurant clusters in central OKC (Plaza, Paseo, Western Avenue, Midtown, 9th, Automobile Alley) are all primarily supported by "tourists." When any of them are busy at all, most of the people got there by automobile. The painfully slow nights are the ones where only neighborhood folks are eating'drinking/shopping.

It's going to be a long, long time before most of these places are populated enough to be busy based only on the people who live immediately around them, especially in downtown proper.

The only way to develop LBT, CBD, DD, SOSA, MOUSE, etc the way you want is to scrap capitalism completely, turn OKC into a city state and then nationalize everything to develop it just the way you want it.

This is a strange response on a lot of levels. Mainly, no one even suggested any nationalization or even government influence to guide lower bricktown developers. The irony, though, is that lower bricktown would not even exist were it not for significant public investment and the developer was hand picked by a government agency. Besides that, the reality is that pure capitalism can and DOES create well thought out redevelopments that are both dense and urban that are VERY successful. At the same time, it creates a lot of uninspiring disposable developments. But, criticism of any development based on its merits is in no way inherently a criticism on the economic model that produced it. I don't even understand where that came from, especially since pure free market principles had very little to do with the development of lower bricktown in the first place.

The reality is that, in this specific case, the model used was the currently popular "public-private" model where significant public investment precedes the investment of a private investor who is hand picked by local government agencies. Public incentives were even later used to entice a tenant to locate there, one which many view as completely counter to the purpose of the original public investment. You would think that after all this risk was eliminated for the developer using public resources, that it would go above and beyond to create something special. In this case, the opposite was true and there is now very little room, if any, for capitol improvements, be they private or public, and little demand to warrant it.

Harkins could go as well. It will back up to the new boulevard. It should have been built with it's back against the railroad viaduct. The fountain is where Mickey Mantle should have been extended across the canal (along with Joe Carter and Byers). Businesses then could have then fronted these roads as they went across the property. Each building would been 15 to 20 feet wide with the volume coming from deep lots and height.

Harkins could go as well. It will back up to the new boulevard. It should have been built with it's back against the railroad viaduct. The fountain is where Mickey Mantle should have been extended across the canal (along with Joe Carter and Byers). Businesses then could have then fronted these roads as they went across the property. Each building would been 15 to 20 feet wide with the volume coming from deep lots and height.

the BLVD behind Harkins will not be at grade .. so i'm not sure how much that matters

the BLVD behind Harkins will not be at grade .. so i'm not sure how much that matters

It will be as it goes behind Harkins. It is going have an intersection at Oklahoma Ave.

It will be as it goes behind Harkins. It is going have an intersection at Oklahoma Ave.

oklahoma is the last (or first) depending on which way your driving .. intersection where the blvd will be at grade

oklahoma is the last (or first) depending on which way your driving .. intersection where the blvd will be at grade

It will return to at-grade as soon as it clears the canal somewhere to the east of where Joe Carter would be. I am pretty sure there will at a minimum be an intersection at S. Walnut as well.

Does anyone else think it's sad that so little of this boulevard will be at-grade?

Spartan, I don't think you should lower your standards -- maybe your volume, though. Just realize that unless you're the developer or city planner who has enacted codes in advance based on a credible plan for the area, you probably don't have a say in what happens there. What you can do is snipe and declare your displeasure on a message board. Yeah, I guess I will vote for you. What are you running for? The OKCTalk Court Jester?

I have seen the light. Now I'm waiting for all those other pesky urbanists who keep demanding standards to also catch on to this breath of enlightenment that Dubya speaketh.

But my say would be that if an area is going to develop without regard to public demands, then it should be deprived of public resources. In a perfect world, we should all be descending on Bricktown, threatening to pick up and move the Ballpark and canal to Mid-town.

Or at least get the naming rights back...

Does anyone else think it's sad that so little of this boulevard will be at-grade?

Yes.

The City gets naming right to the ballpark back in 13 more years.

It will return to at-grade as soon as it clears the canal somewhere to the east of where Joe Carter would be. I am pretty sure there will at a minimum be an intersection at S. Walnut as well.

It doesnt but whatever