http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j286/UnFrSaKn/Downtown%20OKC/Devon%20Tower/July%202011/okcskylinenewwalkeri-40.jpg

khHIS3wxy-o

Anyone else think those "retro" columns would look better with polished smooth concrete instead of rough? You can really tell close up. It's at 3:45.

Thanks for posting the pic & vid (over in Steve's blog too)!

Possibly but I really like the retro look that I have seen in pics (i sometimes have browser issues with video). How noticeable is it while driving at normal speed? Granted there will be some foot traffic which brings us to the next question: I would think grafiti(sp) removal would be harder with a rough surface?? Overall I think they did a good job on it!

Thanks as always, William.

Looks like they *still* don't have that old postal facility demolished! Good grief, it's been months.


I really like the detail shown here on the Western bridge:

http://www.okctalk.com/images/pete/westernbridge.jpg

I almost did video of the postal facility, but figured nobody would care. I drove down the side, the front, and behind it. The front is definitely still there, untouched. The backside looks like it was hit by a missile. There's a huge rubble pile stretching for most of the area behind it.

Yes the detail on the already completed Western bridge is pretty amazing. As many times as I've walked past that bridge doing time lapse, I didn't bother to get video of it. I just assumed everyone here has already noticed it. The south side of the highway has this crimson/cream colored brick pattern. The red bricks are raised up with sides on them, as opposed to flat. The north for some reason lacks nearly as much detail. There are patterns in the concrete along the plain wall, as seen in the video.

Better pictures...

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j286/UnFrSaKn/Downtown%20OKC/Interstate%2040%20Crosstown/I-40CrosstownWalkerAve7-7-11-1.jpg

Robinson Bridge. Looks like it will be done fairly soon.

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j286/UnFrSaKn/Downtown%20OKC/Interstate%2040%20Crosstown/I-40CrosstownWalkerAve7-7-11-2.jpg

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j286/UnFrSaKn/Downtown%20OKC/Interstate%2040%20Crosstown/I-40CrosstownWalkerAve7-7-11-3.jpg

Decorations I was talking about.
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j286/UnFrSaKn/Downtown%20OKC/Interstate%2040%20Crosstown/I-40CrosstownWalkerAve7-7-11-4.jpg

Oh... and here's the rough columns.

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j286/UnFrSaKn/Downtown%20OKC/Interstate%2040%20Crosstown/I-40CrosstownWalkerAve7-7-11-5.jpg

Purely conjecture on this one about the north side not having the detail that the south side does may have been intentional as to not detract/compete with the DT view? Is there much to look at on the South side??? Not a slam in any way and hard to imagine someone with a highway dept thinking aesthetics (but I give them "2 thiumbs up" on the retro columns and some of the details I have seen in various construction (like the buffalo north of DT along), the designs in the intersection somewhere up that way...similar to the Project 180 stuff)

Purely conjecture on this one about the north side not having the detail that the south side does may have been intentional as to not detract/compete with the DT view? Is there much to look at on the South side??? Not a slam in any way and hard to imagine someone with a highway dept thinking aesthetics (but I give them "2 thiumbs up" on the retro columns and some of the details I have seen in various construction (like the buffalo north of DT along), the designs in the intersection somewhere up that way...similar to the Project 180 stuff)

I suspect the mounds of dirt on the side that has not been painted indicates they have not finished the top, when that is finished it will be painted to match

Ooooo, close up the Retro tower is rather rough looking (being charitable). Hope either they aren't finished with it yet (but since the bridge is open), or that it weathers/ages well. But may not have been intended to be viewed closeup and for more than a passing glance (but then there is the sidewalk thing). So I don't know.

Ooooo, close up the Retro tower is rather rough looking (being charitable). Hope either they aren't finished with it yet (but since the bridge is open), or that it weathers/ages well. But may not have been intended to be viewed closeup and for more than a passing glance (but then there is the sidewalk thing). So I don't know.

I'm sure it's not intended as a retro sculpture to be admired by those walking by. It is still far superior to bridge ornamentation we've had in the recent past.

It wasn't a complaint per se, as I stated except for the sidewalks, I would imagine it wasn't intended to be looked at up close and stand still (but at a decent rate of speed and at a relative distance). I really liked the design but all the pics I had seen were from a distance.