View Full Version : Plans may be in place to reduce the Fire dept by an additional 45 personnel



Pages : 1 2 [3]

Wambo36
03-19-2011, 11:51 AM
I knew you would come back out from under the rock with your usual wise ass remarks, thanks for not disapointing us. Again, your figures and comments are wrong as always, but go on and live in "never never land".

PS. the election is over, get on with your lifeDo you have Larry on ignore or something? He's posted the facts and figures that prove you to be dead wrong and all you can do is act like he's said nothing. Please show us where those figures are wrong or admit, what the rest of us have already figured out, that you have no idea what you're talking about.
Even though I know it's an exercise in futility I'm going to ask again. Where are the figures, posted from the citys own web site, wrong? Show us the figures that support your claim that the ratio is 23-1 or admit you're wrong.

PS. You're the only one talking about any election. Maybe you should follow your own advice.

rcjunkie
03-19-2011, 02:58 PM
Do you have Larry on ignore or something? He's posted the facts and figures that prove you to be dead wrong and all you can do is act like he's said nothing. Please show us where those figures are wrong or admit, what the rest of us have already figured out, that you have no idea what you're talking about.
Even though I know it's an exercise in futility I'm going to ask again. Where are the figures, posted from the citys own web site, wrong? Show us the figures that support your claim that the ratio is 23-1 or admit you're wrong.

PS. You're the only one talking about any election. Maybe you should follow your own advice.

Well it's my little fire buddy Wambo, you can't explain to people with blinders on, you, Larry and Barnold continue on in never never land, I'll save my conversations for real men.

Wambo36
03-19-2011, 03:18 PM
Well it's my little fire buddy Wambo, you can't explain to people with blinders on, you, Larry and Barnold continue on in never never land, I'll save my conversations for real men.Why am I not suprised you can't answer a simple question without resorting to attacks?
I'm not asking you to explain anything. We know what your OPINION is. The problem is you're trying to throw that out as fact. What I'm asking you to do (even though I know better) is show the numbers that prove your 23-1 ratio to be correct. Try to focus on the task. I know that coming on here and pulling your "bull in a china shop" routine is your trademark, but today try to actually have a conversation and back up your contentions with some facts. You've been shown the facts that prove you're wrong, try to refute them without attacking anyone. Go ahead, try.

rcjunkie
03-19-2011, 03:46 PM
Why am I not suprised you can't answer a simple question without resorting to attacks?
I'm not asking you to explain anything. We know what your OPINION is. The problem is you're trying to throw that out as fact. What I'm asking you to do (even though I know better) is show the numbers that prove your 23-1 ratio to be correct. Try to focus on the task. I know that coming on here and pulling your "bull in a china shop" routine is your trademark, but today try to actually have a conversation and back up your contentions with some facts. You've been shown the facts that prove you're wrong, try to refute them without attacking anyone. Go ahead, try.

I save the personal attacks for Barnold, that's his method of operation. Again, and try to follow along, you, as always have on blinders, I'll save my time for someone thats open minded and willing to look at all evidence.

P.S. come on up to Tenkiller, the fish are biting.

Wambo36
03-19-2011, 03:59 PM
I save the personal attacks for Barnold, that's his method of operation. Again, and try to follow along, you, as always have on blinders, I'll save my time for someone thats open minded and willing to look at all evidence.

P.S. come on up to Tenkiller, the fish are biting.In other words you have no evidence to back up your claims and aren't up to admitting that you were wrong. That's all the answer I need, thanks.

P.S. Just got back from the lake. Thanks anyway.

rcjunkie
03-19-2011, 04:12 PM
In other words you have no evidence to back up your claims and aren't up to admitting that you were wrong. That's all the answer I need, thanks.

P.S. Just got back from the lake. Thanks anyway.

Your welcome little buddy!!

Larry OKC
03-20-2011, 12:39 AM
Reminded of the Jack Nicholson's delivery of the line "You can't handle the truth!" I wouldn't be surprised if he has me on ignore. May be because I try to refrain from responding in kind and stick to the issues, keeping personalities out of it. Not always easy to be sure. Sometimes fail. In any event, even if he never sees the facts, they are put out there for others to see.

I don't have a dog in the fight as I am not a P.S. employee and don't have any family members that are either. Have followed the claims made by both sides and when I looked into it, the vast majority of the P.S. claims proved to be factually the case. On the other hand, specific claims made by the other side was directly contradicted by his former employer's own budget reports. I don't understand why some haven't learned by now to at least verify the information before they put it out there as fact. One thing to have remembered something incorrectly and be off by a couple of percentage points but when they are sooooooo far off....that may be a more accurate display of male bovine excrement.

rcjunkie
03-20-2011, 07:47 AM
reminded of the jack nicholson's delivery of the line "you can't handle the truth!" i wouldn't be surprised if he has me on ignore. May be because i try to refrain from responding in kind and stick to the issues, keeping personalities out of it. Not always easy to be sure. Sometimes fail. In any event, even if he never sees the facts, they are put out there for others to see.

I don't have a dog in the fight as i am not a p.s. Employee and don't have any family members that are either. Have followed the claims made by both sides and when i looked into it, the vast majority of the p.s. Claims proved to be factually the case. On the other hand, specific claims made by the other side was directly contradicted by his former employer's own budget reports. I don't understand why some haven't learned by now to at least verify the information before they put it out there as fact. One thing to have remembered something incorrectly and be off by a couple of percentage points but when they are sooooooo far off....that may be a more accurate display of male bovine excrement.

yawn

Samokc
03-21-2011, 07:27 PM
Firefighters are cross trained both! But say as the last week, a grass fire starts a house fire? Or while those men are off the engine and ladder on a grass fire an apt fire breaks out? Not at all unlikely! What about medical calls those don't stop during grass fires! And keep in mind not everyone lives in a neighborhood with concrete drives! Those brush pumpers are needed for medical calls as well as attacking rural house fire!

Samokc
03-21-2011, 07:30 PM
Lol you either work for them or know nothing... I'd never trust my family in one of those ambulances on a serious call with out a FF paramedic! Keep cutting hope ur not one of those few fires you speak about!