Lol

I think the many in the anti arena group in Norman just don’t want it built anywhere. But, they would be cutting off their nose to spite their face to torpedo this kind of development in Norman, regardless of their resentment of the university.

I think the many in the anti arena group in Norman just don’t want it built anywhere. But, they would be cutting off their nose to spite their face to torpedo this kind of development in Norman, regardless of their resentment of the university.

this is exactly correct .. they are saying no to almost 800 mil dollars of non arena development ..

Well if it does go to a vote of the people OU has an opportunity to make its case. I don't mind having a vote of the people on these issues. Gives both sides a way to make their case and get it done.

I think the many in the anti arena group in Norman just don’t want it built anywhere. But, they would be cutting off their nose to spite their face to torpedo this kind of development in Norman, regardless of their resentment of the university.

I think there are two groups…those opposed to paying additional taxes for anything (even though they aren’t directly) and don’t want the city on the hook for an arena and those who want the stadium built on the main campus at all costs and think voting this down achieves that eventually.

I love the look of the renderings but building a new arena significantly off campus has always been a silly idea, and going even further from campus if the people of Norman say no to this plan is an even sillier idea. If I was still a Norman voter I'd probably be voting yes to cancel this plan if it does go up for a vote.

I think there are two groups…those opposed to paying additional taxes for anything (even though they aren’t directly) and don’t want the city on the hook for an arena and those who want the stadium built on the main campus at all costs and think voting this down achieves that eventually.
So, status quo. Let’s live in a vibrant city but not risk anything or pay anything to have it. And those that couldn’t care less about things outside their front and back door.

So, status quo. Let’s live in a vibrant city but not risk anything or pay anything to have it. And those that couldn’t care less about things outside their front and back door.

If you read anything from Norman groups online you know that a ton of people just hate the UNP area in general. It's considered "not Norman" and the west side is "basically Edmond". People are strange in this town. Politically I have seen from both sides they hate this. One side thinks it is a tax increase and will always say no, the other thinks sports shouldn't be paid for by a city. It's fun to see from the sidelines!

If you read anything from Norman groups online you know that a ton of people just hate the UNP area in general. It's considered "not Norman" and the west side is "basically Edmond". People are strange in this town. Politically I have seen from both sides they hate this. One side thinks it is a tax increase and will always say no, the other thinks sports shouldn't be paid for by a city. It's fun to see from the sidelines!

Except the OKC metro area suffers because of their stupidity. Norman has unique demographics that would suit a lot of different retailers and bars and restaurants that the rest of the metro may not, yet because they are very anti-large development, and you could even say anti-growth, they hinder new and exciting options for the metro.

If you read anything from Norman groups online you know that a ton of people just hate the UNP area in general. It's considered "not Norman" and the west side is "basically Edmond". People are strange in this town. Politically I have seen from both sides they hate this. One side thinks it is a tax increase and will always say no, the other thinks sports shouldn't be paid for by a city. It's fun to see from the sidelines!
I’d believe this except for the huge amount of business they do with Normanites. I think people project onto others.

I love the look of the renderings but building a new arena significantly off campus has always been a silly idea, and going even further from campus if the people of Norman say no to this plan is an even sillier idea. If I was still a Norman voter I'd probably be voting yes to cancel this plan if it does go up for a vote.I don't think building a new arena off campus is a silly idea at all. Especially if it brings revenue to the university and more exposure for the OU athletic teams that will play there, including basketball, gymnastics, volleyball, etc. It will increase attendance and that will increase NIL money, which is THE key issue in college sports today.

So is this vote binding?

So is this vote binding?

we technically don't even know if there is going to be a vote yet. still waiting to verify all the signatures on the petition.

I think there are two groups…those opposed to paying additional taxes for anything (even though they aren’t directly) and don’t want the city on the hook for an arena and those who want the stadium built on the main campus at all costs and think voting this down achieves that eventually.

Guilty :wink:

OU will be better off with this built on-campus even if it takes another 10-15 years for it to happen.

we technically don't even know if there is going to be a vote yet. still waiting to verify all the signatures on the petition.

They apparently got over 11k signatures. If that is the case, then this TIF will fail very badly.

Now Jersey Boss can be happy, and Norman can have the empty northern part of UNP they deserve.

Can also take down that article on the front page.

Wow 11k is a lot in 3 weeks. Sounds like some strong opposition to it.

They apparently got over 11k signatures. If that is the case, then this TIF will fail very badly.

Why do you say that? Isn't the success of the Petition a more telling statement of the veracity of the group opposing this TIF and less indicative of the actual TIF support? Or is 9% of the population signing the Petition meaningful in some way I don't understand.

My belief is that many signed the Petition because they don't like how the City Council pushed it through, not necessarily because they will ultimately vote "no." I'm sure many will vote no, but I also won't be surprised if the vote to build it passes 60/40 (a landslide) - especially after the money behind the build goes into full-on campaign mode.

Why do you say that? Isn't the success of the Petition a more telling statement of the veracity of the group opposing this TIF and less indicative of the actual TIF support? Or is 9% of the population signing the Petition meaningful in some way I don't understand.

My belief is that many signed the Petition because they don't like how the City Council pushed it through, not necessarily because they will ultimately vote "no." I'm sure many will vote no, but I also won't be surprised if the vote to build it passes 60/40 (a landslide) - especially after the money behind the build goes into full-on campaign mode.

Hahaha, 6100 signatures were needed to get this on the ballot. That's it. How many people do you think actually vote, and how many will on a random Tuesday in February?

Hahaha, 6100 signatures were needed to get this on the ballot. That's it. How many people do you think actually vote, and how many will on a random Tuesday in February?

Disclaimer that I don't live in Norman and don't have a dog in this fight. But I'm enjoying watching from the sidelines!

I'd wager that voter turnout for this issue is around 15,000-20,000 - and that it passes with more than 8-10k "yes" votes.

What's your take, Bison? Are my estimates on turnout way too high?

More residents in Norman want this to happen, then don't. Moreover OU and the City of Norman have the influence and money to buy votes and to fuel a campaign.

Disclaimer that I don't live in Norman and don't have a dog in this fight. But I'm enjoying watching from the sidelines!

I'd wager that voter turnout for this issue is around 15,000-20,000 - and that it passes with more than 8-10k "yes" votes.

What's your take, Bison? Are my estimates on turnout way too high?

This years February elections had 15% turnout. 6,000ish people.

This years February elections had 15% turnout. 6,000ish people.

I would think this vote will draw a lot more than were inclined to roll out for a standard city council election. This is a hot topic. can it double? Maybe that's optimistic. There's like 22k students on main campus. I doubt many of them cared to vote in the city council election. I anticipate many will care to vote on a TIF matter that could net them a brand-new arena. But maybe with the arena being off-campus they won't roll out? IDK. But I do believe OU and the money behind this development will be throwing a LOT of cash into getting students and yes voters to show out.

I'll stand on my 15k-20k voter showing estimate which is admittedly based on no personal knowledge. :p

More residents in Norman want this to happen, then don't. Moreover OU and the City of Norman have the influence and money to buy votes and to fuel a campaign.

Haha, I think you are being very optimistic. This is double the amount of people that voted in this past year's February election.

I would think this vote will draw a lot more than were inclined to roll out for a standard city council election. This is a hot topic. can it double? Maybe that's optimistic. There's like 22k students on main campus. I doubt many of them cared to vote in the city council election. I anticipate many will care to vote on a TIF matter that could net them a brand-new arena. But maybe with the arena being off-campus they won't roll out? IDK. But I do believe OU and the money behind this development will be throwing a LOT of cash into getting students and yes voters to show out.

I'll stand on my 15k-20k voter showing estimate which is admittedly based on no personal knowledge. :p

I hope you are right. But them having nearly double the amount needed is damning, to me.

I would think this vote will draw a lot more than were inclined to roll out for a standard city council election. This is a hot topic. can it double? Maybe that's optimistic. There's like 22k students on main campus. I doubt many of them cared to vote in the city council election. I anticipate many will care to vote on a TIF matter that could net them a brand-new arena. But maybe with the arena being off-campus they won't roll out? IDK. But I do believe OU and the money behind this development will be throwing a LOT of cash into getting students and yes voters to show out.

I'll stand on my 15k-20k voter showing estimate which is admittedly based on no personal knowledge. :p

Most of the students don't vote as they aren't residents of Norman (permanent). The OGE March election had around 16k come out to vote but that wasn't a special election so who knows!

i mean i think if they get the signatures, they will win the election, and this will fail. and norman will suffer. just like the fights against the turnpikes have now just turned into them still being built, but less useable for the citizens of Norman. This anti-development group here sure wants to avoid having norman grow and get better. but then constantly complain about norman in the same conversation.

i mean i think if they get the signatures, they will win the election, and this will fail. and norman will suffer. just like the fights against the turnpikes have now just turned into them still being built, but less useable for the citizens of Norman. This anti-development group here sure wants to avoid having norman grow and get better. but then constantly complain about norman in the same conversation.

They want $1 billion dollar developments to just pop up, all on other people's dimes. You won't find many of those in any city, let alone one thr size of Norman.

So, they needed 6.1k signatures to get this on the February ballot, instead they turned in 11k, and the previous February special election had a turnout of just 6k? The interests behind this proposal with the big bucks better be prepared to spend some of that on a GOTV campaign.

I guess the ONLY thing that could help OU is that the February election is the same as the mayoral election.

However, most who signed this were unhappy with how the mayor handled this, so it might be more of a hindrance to OU.

They want $1 billion dollar developments to just pop up, all on other people's dimes. You won't find many of those in any city, let alone one thr size of Norman.

Yeah people dont want a 1 billion dollar development on their dime and want developers to pay for it. What is wrong with them...

Yeah people dont want a 1 billion dollar development on their dime and want developers to pay for it. What is wrong with them...

Because it is a fallacy in logic. I want nice things, but I don't want to pay for them. OKC has learned that TIFs help a lot, and are reaping the benefits. Norman misses out on tons of developments because they don't want to pay anything at all.

Even in NYC and LA, projects get help.

so where was all the outrage on the TIF district to Main street to beautify it? why can't those business owners pay for that on their own? it's such a dumb idea to suggest, because even if this builds naturally over the next 30 years, public money is still going to be used for lots of it.

so where was all the outrage on the TIF district to Main street to beautify it? why can't those business owners pay for that on their own? it's such a dumb idea to suggest, because even if this builds naturally over the next 30 years, public money is still going to be used for lots of it.

It likely is 100% the amount, and who it benefits. Norman citizens don't love OU.

so where was all the outrage on the TIF district to Main street to beautify it? why can't those business owners pay for that on their own? it's such a dumb idea to suggest, because even if this builds naturally over the next 30 years, public money is still going to be used for lots of it.

Apples and oranges. The Main Street TIF has led to the urban revitalization of the city center which benefits all of Norman. UNP is an entertainment district next to a strip mall on the interstate.

Apples and oranges. The Main Street TIF has led to the urban revitalization of the city center which benefits all of Norman. UNP is an entertainment district next to a strip mall on the interstate.

With stores all of Norman goes.to frequently. I don't love the project, but UNP is the busiest shopping center in the state, by far. So to say this doesn't benefit all of Norman is borderline asinine, and should disqualify you from speaking on this project. Especially since you are in Tulsa, 140 miles away from UNP and Norman.

Apples and oranges. The Main Street TIF has led to the urban revitalization of the city center which benefits all of Norman. UNP is an entertainment district next to a strip mall on the interstate.
So, if it was moved a couple miles south and east it would all be okay then?

I’d check the sales tax records to see the relative financial impact on the city.

I’d also like to see a downtown Norman developer spend hundreds of millions to create a new venue and tax income stream for the city while enhancing its biggest city business, the University of Oklahoma. Please someone step up to partner both with the city and with the university. Don’t see anyone else doing it for a very, very long time.

Norman citizens don't love OU.

exactly this... and i have no clue why. most of the people on my block always complain about OU, but this city wouldn't be even remotely close to what it is, without the University. I have never lived somewhere before and see people so opposed to things that are good for it, and hate the very thing that makes it exist in the first place

With stores all of Norman goes.to frequently. I don't love the project, but UNP is the busiest shopping center in the state, by far. So to say this doesn't benefit all of Norman is borderline asinine, and should disqualify you from speaking on this project. Especially since you are in Tulsa, 140 miles away from UNP and Norman.

I own rental properties in Norman so as a taxpayer I think I can speak about developments in the city. And one that can continue the revitalization of Campus Corner/ downtown Norman vs suck energy from it (the UNP “entertainment district”) will 100% have my support.

I want OU to have a new arena, LNC is terrible. And the renderings look great - build that exact same thing at Brooks & Jenkins on land OU already owns, like every other university that has built a new arena in the past 30 years. Look at what schools with a lot less resources than OU have successfully done like Auburn, Baylor, Texas Tech, Ole Miss, etc

I own rental properties in Norman so as a taxpayer I think I can speak about developments in the city. And one that can continue the revitalization of Campus Corner/ downtown Norman vs suck energy from it (the UNP “entertainment district”) will 100% have my support.

I want OU to have a new arena, LNC is terrible. And the renderings look great - build that exact same thing at Brooks & Jenkins on land OU already owns, like every other university that has built a new arena in the past 30 years. Look at what schools with a lot less resources than OU have successfully done like Auburn, Baylor, Texas Tech, Ole Miss, etc

Money...no developer wants to help out and build it there, they want to build it at UNP. OU has a donor problem: their donors suck, and OU doesn't have many BMDs (big money donors). So yeah, until the money gets found, someway, this is the best option. Norman will never help OU, even though they would benefit immensely from a new arena for OU.

Again it comes down to this: OU has minimal big-money donors, so it would take years to fundraise for an arena. OU is smart to try this, and if it passes, great. If not, they will seek other alternatives, either another city or by some other method.

Money...no developer wants to help out and build it there, they want to build it at UNP. OU has a donor problem: their donors suck, and OU doesn't have many BMDs (big money donors). So yeah, until the money gets found, someway, this is the best option. Norman will never help OU, even though they would benefit immensely from a new arena for OU.

Again it comes down to this: OU has minimal big-money donors, so it would take years to fundraise for an arena. OU is smart to try this, and if it passes, great. If not, they will seek other alternatives, either another city or by some other method.

OU has plenty of big donors - present a plan to build a new arena on-campus and it will have support from donors, students and Norman residents. This would be the center piece of the largest TOD in the metro outside of downtown OKC.

Money...no developer wants to help out and build it there, they want to build it at UNP. OU has a donor problem: their donors suck, and OU doesn't have many BMDs (big money donors). So yeah, until the money gets found, someway, this is the best option. Norman will never help OU, even though they would benefit immensely from a new arena for OU.

Again it comes down to this: OU has minimal big-money donors, so it would take years to fundraise for an arena. OU is smart to try this, and if it passes, great. If not, they will seek other alternatives, either another city or by some other method.

OU has plenty of big money donors. This is a 100% business decision and has been in the works for many years. OU hasn't built a new arena because they don't have the money, they haven't built one because they are trying to get it built with minimal capital investment out of their own coffers. Why build one yourself for $350 million when you can possibly get someone else to build it for $100 million investment and, simultaneously, create a unique entertainment district around it? Not to mention a lease vs. the long-term ownership costs. It's a no-brainer. Don't mistake not having built an on-campus arena yet being because of a lack of money. That's a lazy, but predictable, take. The reality is much more complex.

They knew the path to this wouldn't be short and easy, and they'll continue to pursue this option if and until it is clear that it can't get done. Then they will either increase their ante to compensate for the lack of TIF, the project will get scaled back to something that can be done without TIF, or some combination of thereof. The last option, if these can't be worked out, would be to build it back on campus.

OU has plenty of big money donors. This is a 100% business decision and has been in the works for many years. OU hasn't built a new arena because they don't have the money, they haven't built one because they are trying to get it built with minimal capital investment out of their own coffers. Why build one yourself for $350 million when you can possibly get someone else to build it for $100 million investment and, simultaneously, create a unique entertainment district around it? Not to mention a lease vs. the long-term ownership costs. It's a no-brainer. Don't mistake not having built an on-campus arena yet being because of a lack of money. That's a lazy, but predictable, take. The reality is much more complex.

They knew the path to this wouldn't be short and easy, and they'll continue to pursue this option if and until it is clear that it can't get done. Then they will either increase their ante to compensate for the lack of TIF, the project will get scaled back to something that can be done without TIF, or some combination of thereof. The last option, if these can't be worked out, would be to build it back on campus.

Part of that is that OU is 100% a football school with some softball on the side (though gymnastics and golf should be mentioned more). Unfortunately, basketball is an afterthought (especially with the Thunder around). Why put a basketball facility on a football campus. Just leave it as is or let other people help in a location that benefits them (or the city).

Duplicate - please delete.

Part of that is that OU is 100% a football school with some softball on the side (though gymnastics and golf should be mentioned more). Unfortunately, basketball is an afterthought (especially with the Thunder around). Why put a basketball facility on a football campus. Just leave it as is or let other people help in a location that benefits them (or the city).

The LNC does not just hold basketball games. There are lots of other university and non-university events there throughout the year. Specifically graduation ceremonies, new student orientation and concerts that are better held on the OU campus vs. at LNC or UNP.

But these four items are the biggest benefit of an on-campus area:
1. Proximity to student housing - already more 8,000 students live within a mile radius and that number will only increase as additional student apartments get built along the Jenkins corridor from OU to downtown Norman, and around Boyd & Jenkins where there are two active proposals that will increase housing density by 500+ beds.
2. Proximity to Campus Corner and downtown Norman - an on-campus arena is walking distance from both of these areas which will increase business before/after games and lead to further revitalization of these areas.
3. Parking dispersal - the new arena would likely utilize existing surface parking at the Duck Pond but would also be able to leverage existing and future parking garages on-campus to disperse parking so people are coming and going from different locations, resulting in less traffic jams after games. UNP will be an absolute nightmare with traffic due to the lack of multiple ingress/egress points.
4. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) - this arena would be less than 1/4 mile from a stop on the future Edmond-OKC-Norman commuter rail line allowing fans from OKC/Edmond the ability to park at a station further north and ride the train to games.

The LNC does not just hold basketball games. There are lots of other university and non-university events there throughout the year. Specifically graduation ceremonies, new student orientation and concerts that are better held on the OU campus vs. at LNC or UNP.

But these four items are the biggest benefit of an on-campus area:
1. Proximity to student housing - already more 8,000 students live within a mile radius and that number will only increase as additional student apartments get built along the Jenkins corridor from OU to downtown Norman, and around Boyd & Jenkins where there are two active proposals that will increase housing density by 500+ beds.
2. Proximity to Campus Corner and downtown Norman - an on-campus arena is walking distance from both of these areas which will increase business before/after games and lead to further revitalization of these areas.
3. Parking dispersal - the new arena would likely utilize existing surface parking at the Duck Pond but would also be able to leverage existing and future parking garages on-campus to disperse parking so people are coming and going from different locations, resulting in less traffic jams after games. UNP will be an absolute nightmare with traffic due to the lack of multiple ingress/egress points.
4. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) - this arena would be less than 1/4 mile from a stop on the future Edmond-OKC-Norman commuter rail line allowing fans from OKC/Edmond the ability to park at a station further north and ride the train to games.

Pretty much all of this is why I would refer to the off-campus arena idea as silly.

Pretty much all of this is why I would refer to the off-campus arena idea as silly.

I have one counter: money. It's easy to say all of this when it isn't your money that's being spent.

No one has offered to help fund an on-campus arena. Most new arenas at the college level are funded by at least one pilot donation that is very large.

And there has not been one for a new arena for OU.

The LNC does not just hold basketball games. There are lots of other university and non-university events there throughout the year. Specifically graduation ceremonies, new student orientation and concerts that are better held on the OU campus vs. at LNC or UNP.

But these four items are the biggest benefit of an on-campus area:
1. Proximity to student housing - already more 8,000 students live within a mile radius and that number will only increase as additional student apartments get built along the Jenkins corridor from OU to downtown Norman, and around Boyd & Jenkins where there are two active proposals that will increase housing density by 500+ beds.
2. Proximity to Campus Corner and downtown Norman - an on-campus arena is walking distance from both of these areas which will increase business before/after games and lead to further revitalization of these areas.
3. Parking dispersal - the new arena would likely utilize existing surface parking at the Duck Pond but would also be able to leverage existing and future parking garages on-campus to disperse parking so people are coming and going from different locations, resulting in less traffic jams after games. UNP will be an absolute nightmare with traffic due to the lack of multiple ingress/egress points.
4. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) - this arena would be less than 1/4 mile from a stop on the future Edmond-OKC-Norman commuter rail line allowing fans from OKC/Edmond the ability to park at a station further north and ride the train to games.

While the first 3 points are valid (very few people outside of this forum will likely ride a commuter train), that really doesn’t matter if the money isn’t there. LNC will do fine for a football school… at least until someone donates millions of dollars to make the basketball (plus) facility on campus… especially when McCasland Field House is still available for the non-revenue sports that want to be on campus.

I have one counter: money. It's easy to say all of this when it isn't your money that's being spent.

No one has offered to help fund an on-campus arena. Most new arenas at the college level are funded by at least one pilot donation that is very large.

And there has not been one for a new arena for OU.

And this is probably 80% of why Norman citizens dont support the UNP arena. They are asking themselves why should their city heavily subsidize an arena that OU cant or wont try to build on their own. So OU doesnt have a few big time donors to get a new arena going, or that they are redirecting donations to NIL, and so city of Norman should fund it instead? Its a simple as that.

And this is probably 80% of why Norman citizens dont support the UNP arena. They are asking themselves why should their city heavily subsidize an arena that OU cant or wont try to build on their own. So OU doesnt have a few big time donors to get a new arena going, or that they are redirecting donations to NIL, and so city of Norman should fund it instead? Its a simple as that.

Have you looked at OUs alumni base? It may be one of the smallest, poorest in the Power 4 conferences. So working them for a lot of money is very hard to do. Just my opinion.

They could, if given 5 years, raise for an arena, sure. But fundraising has been lagging, compared to other schools.

And one that can continue the revitalization of Campus Corner/ downtown Norman vs suck energy from it (the UNP “entertainment district”) will 100% have my support.


this is such a bad argument.... things that will come to UNP aren't going to be things that would go to CC or downtown... they are two completely different markets that would attract different businesses. it's not an either/or proposition. i want to support things that will help Downtown and UNP... because that is possible.

this is such a bad argument.... things that will come to UNP aren't going to be things that would go to CC or downtown... they are two completely different markets that would attract different businesses. it's not an either/or proposition. i want to support things that will help Downtown and UNP... because that is possible.

The land at UNP where the arena would be located is better for the City of Norman as sales tax-generating retail and/or apartments. Or build what was originally envisioned for this parcel which was an office park focused on advanced manufacturing and aerospace/engineering-related businesses which makes sense being next to an airport. That along with retail/apartments would be a significant revenue generator for Norman, and the off-the-interstate location makes it a perfect spot.

This is what was originally proposed:
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/normantranscript.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/e/0e/e0ec2a3c-76ab-11e4-a3d2-ffebc2703672/5477e820153f8.image.jpg?resize=1033%2C500

The land at UNP where the arena would be located is better for the City of Norman as sales tax-generating retail and/or apartments. Or build what was originally envisioned for this parcel which was an office park focused on advanced manufacturing and aerospace/engineering-related businesses which makes sense being next to an airport.

This is what was originally proposed:
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/normantranscript.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/e/0e/e0ec2a3c-76ab-11e4-a3d2-ffebc2703672/5477e820153f8.image.jpg?resize=1033%2C500

this is an idea that has just never come to fruition.... this isn't the land that the Arena was going to be on, this is back just north of the young center... that pond area was built like 10 years ago, and literally nothing has ever happened. the arena would go across 24th to the west.... so i'm not sure what you are saying???? Lets also not forget that this idea for that parcel you are talking about was envisioned over 15 years ago, and it never ever came close to being an actual idea of bringing a company in for it....

It likely is 100% the amount, and who it benefits. Norman citizens don't love OU.

Lived in Norman from the age of 2-32 and now live just outside of Norman. I have numerous family and friends still in Norman. Not a single one of them doesn't love the university.
Some Norman residents may not but IMO they are a very small number.

It may get 11,000 signatures but I still think it will still pass anyway

And this is probably 80% of why Norman citizens dont support the UNP arena. They are asking themselves why should their city heavily subsidize an arena that OU cant or wont try to build on their own. So OU doesnt have a few big time donors to get a new arena going, or that they are redirecting donations to NIL, and so city of Norman should fund it instead? Its a simple as that.

And yet the citizens who will neverf suport activities at the U will gladly accept all the commerce and taxes generated by those that do from outside Norman, and they will gladly brag on the nice restaurants and businesses that exist because the university is there and provides them a market.

Support is a two way thing. Wanting it all in your favor with someone else footing the bill is wrong even if it is the “citizens”. Why should a donor in Altus write a big check that ultimately supports Norman? People can be so myopic.

And yet the citizens who will neverf suport activities at the U will gladly accept all the commerce and taxes generated by those that do from outside Norman, and they will gladly brag on the nice restaurants and businesses that exist because the university is there and provides them a market.

Support is a two way thing. Wanting it all in your favor with someone else footing the bill is wrong even if it is the “citizens”. Why should a donor in Altus write a big check that ultimately supports Norman? People can be so myopic.

"My town gets lots of benefits from this school thats been here for a long time so us citizens must approve a billion dollar incentive package for a new arena." Im sorry but this is just a ridiculous argument.

Its funny in another thread theres talk about how much it is to buy out Venables for $40+ million and Im sure some want it to happen. And then many of those same people think Norman must do everything for this new arena because OU just cant raise the money and Norman owes it to OU.

"My town gets lots of benefits from this school thats been here for a long time so us citizens must approve a billion dollar incentive package for a new arena." Im sorry but this is just a ridiculous argument.

Its funny in another thread theres talk about how much it is to buy out Venables for $40+ million and Im sure some want it to happen. And then many of those same people think Norman must do everything for this new arena because OU just cant raise the money and Norman owes it to OU.

this costs the city 0.00 dollars ..

"My town gets lots of benefits from this school thats been here for a long time so us citizens must approve a billion dollar incentive package for a new arena." Im sorry but this is just a ridiculous argument.

Its funny in another thread theres talk about how much it is to buy out Venables for $40+ million and Im sure some want it to happen. And then many of those same people think Norman must do everything for this new arena because OU just cant raise the money and Norman owes it to OU.
I believe the city will only give up something it isnt going to get anyway, and still make money. Plus, the developer is putting up hundreds of millions of dollars to make it happen. City grows, city benefits, city risks nothing, city has much higher profile. Or the city can do nothing and stay as it is for a very long time.

The people who vote against this would likely turn down someone wanting to give them a free $100 preferring to hold out for $500 they will never get.

The people who vote against this would likely turn down someone wanting to give them a free $100 preferring to hold out for $500 they will never get.

this is a perfect comparison. this land has sat empty and ready for development for 20 years, there is now a proposal to actually develop it, and the people of Norman are like "we don't want to have to pay for it, even though we really won't be paying for it, because it will just develop on it's own, even though it hasn't in 20 years"

this is a perfect comparison. this land has sat empty and ready for development for 20 years, there is now a proposal to actually develop it, and the people of Norman are like "we don't want to have to pay for it, even though we really won't be paying for it, because it will just develop on it's own, even though it hasn't in 20 years"

well said

I will be honest, I didnt really know the arguments against this TIF until I read Cynthia Rogers blog outlining the funding and how it works. https://tif-ed.blogspot.com

Interesting arguments there where I see the most issue is the school funding as well as the shift in consumer spending to the area at the sake of other parts of town.