View Full Version : OKC mass transit announcement!!



Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

metro
05-12-2009, 02:43 PM
ohhhhh I'm seeing and hearing great things. Will post more tonight! As always you hear it first with metro. Media will be on this shortly. Gazette will have an article on the announcement tomorrow.

Midtowner
05-12-2009, 02:44 PM
1. Sign up a new user name.
2. Post everything you know under said user name.

BDP
05-12-2009, 04:00 PM
3. And do it from the library using an IP anonymizer.

sethsrott
05-12-2009, 04:07 PM
I wait with baited breath (I am not being sarcastic in the least) I can only hope that this turns out to be a big as Metro is making it sound. I am going to buck the trend and put my faith in him and his comments, I hope that I am not wrong in doing so.

metro
05-12-2009, 04:29 PM
The Modern Transit Project for Oklahoma City (http://www.mtpokc.com) updates all night!

AFCM
05-12-2009, 04:33 PM
Rock on.

Midtowner
05-12-2009, 04:37 PM
I do believe that is a picture of a light rail car.

http://www.mtpokc.com/images/mtpokc_placeholder.jpg

AFCM
05-12-2009, 04:45 PM
We should start a countdown to see how much time passes before NewsOK does a story on this.

westsidesooner
05-12-2009, 04:49 PM
Very cool......... I can't wait for details.

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 05:29 PM
I've heard some details I cannot yet share. But I will say that the strategy is very well thought-through, pragmatic and eminently expandable.

Midtowner
05-12-2009, 05:58 PM
What the heck is all this secrecy? Just create another account tied to a fake email and post away from your cell phone. Leaks are moral.

(but they might get you fired)

BG918
05-12-2009, 06:08 PM
I'll make a guess: plans for downtown/OUHSC streetcar circular route and commuter rail to Norman-Edmond.

Martin
05-12-2009, 06:12 PM
ugggh... logo reminds me too much of this: -M

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/00665/ogc_1__665977n.gif

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:22 PM
"We should start a countdown to see how much time passes before NewsOK does a story on this."

Or let's see how much time passes before someone copies and pastes another NewsOK story. Let's not throw rocks while living in glass houses, shall we? It's these sort of nonsense comments that really make me want to ask Pete to honor my own request to not let MY stories be fully copied here.

mecarr
05-12-2009, 06:24 PM
I heard about this project a few days. IT is a light-rail system. If it's approved by voters, expect to see it in downtown in 10 years. I think that's the timeline they are looking at.

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:25 PM
There is no real new news here, just a promotion and push to make it happen.

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 06:28 PM
There is no real new news here, just a promotion and push to make it happen.

When exactly has there been any news on this?

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:29 PM
Bryan Dean and I have both written repeatedly about discussions to create a downtown light rail circulator system. Of course, if you don't read The Oklahoman, you might have missed those stories, especially if someone forgot to copy and paste them on OKC Talk.

donbroncho
05-12-2009, 06:33 PM
wow Steve you sound pretty cranky tonight, but I understand why. People on here like to rip the Oklahoman all the time, though not a week goes by that there isint an article posted on here from the paper.

I do like that logo/picture thing...

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:36 PM
Sorry, but it's getting very, very old. I'm working another 10-hour day and I see my place trashed on here all the time by the same people who don't mind copying and pasting our stuff on this site for the benefit of everyone but those who toiled to create it. I think it's time newspapers start standing up for their work.

Midtowner
05-12-2009, 06:36 PM
The logo could have looked like this...

http://funbunker.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ocp-logo.jpg

If Steve likes this post, then by God, no edit.

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:36 PM
Thanks for making me smile Midtowner.

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:47 PM
So here's the real story for those who want to go beyond the hype: Jeff Bezdek is launching a web site that promotes including a downtown light rail circulator in MAPS 3. He's doing this after the push for transit in MAPS 3 lost momentum at the latest Greater OKC Chamber. Bezdek is an architect and downtown resident and advocate. I'm not sure if Bryan Dean has this story or not.
So are we any closer to getting a light rail system with this story? I'll leave it to you to decide if this is the most important story of the day.

Architect2010
05-12-2009, 06:51 PM
Ehh! Exciting! Will the website launch at 12:00 midnight? XP

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:52 PM
Geez

PLANSIT
05-12-2009, 06:54 PM
Not trying to split hairs, but the logo/graphic is Modern Streetcar, not LRT. And the proposed DT Circulator is not LRT, it is Modern Streetcar.

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 06:55 PM
Bryan Dean and I have both written repeatedly about discussions to create a downtown light rail circulator system. Of course, if you don't read The Oklahoman, you might have missed those stories, especially if someone forgot to copy and paste them on OKC Talk.

Wow. That sounds really snotty. And I read the Oklahoman just about every day.

Steve
05-12-2009, 06:57 PM
Sooner, forgive me. Just cranky tonight. A particular online person who copies and pastes my stuff as often as others drink water has belittled myself and my profession repeatedly today and I'm just not filtering as well as usual. I've tried to address it with this person in private, but with no real long-lasting results. I'm going to finish my story and log off for the night. I'll return when I'm a happy camper again.

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 06:58 PM
No harm, no foul.

wsucougz
05-12-2009, 07:06 PM
Not trying to split hairs, but the logo/graphic is Modern Streetcar, not LRT. And the proposed DT Circulator is not LRT, it is Modern Streetcar.

Thank god - light rail strikes me as overkill right now. A streetcar is a good start and, imo, will be a hit.

metro
05-12-2009, 07:14 PM
Correct it is modern streetcar. I've seen the renderings and you all will be impressed. I understand this as the first REAL plan to get reliable mass transit off the ground. Why don't you all judge for yourselves around midnight when the site launches. Stay tuned!!

Pete
05-12-2009, 07:31 PM
Looks very cool!

I agree that a CBD / Bricktown / Capitol / OUHSC / Midtown / Mesta Park / OK River circular would do wonders for helping to create a critical mass in the inner core and launching mass transit that people might actually use.

Look forward to more details.

hipsterdoofus
05-12-2009, 07:43 PM
Maybe this will be as successful as the gas guzzler trollies that drive around empty all day ;-)

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 07:49 PM
I really hope our city leaders don't let us down this time. This is the best time in memory for a project like this. It is popular with the citizens, it has worked in other cities, and it would catapult the city's image and crystallize the "big league" talk.

Let's hope the politicians who run things here don't choke and leave some of this out of MAPS. I don't know all of the plans but the citizens, when given the choice, said they wanted TRANSIT over everything else: Central Park, Core to Shore, Convention Center, roads, etc.

This cannot be overstated. The citizens have made it clear to our city leaders that they want improved TRANSIT -- over everything else.

Let's respectfully hold our city leadership accountable to the citizens of this growing city.

Steve
05-12-2009, 07:52 PM
Based on what I'm hearing, if you really want to see transit on a MAPS 3 ballot, you will need to take extraordinary steps to make voices heard over those of competing interests. Are you willing to appear before council in the citizen's comment period after the agenda is completed? Are you willing to write or phone your council person? Are you willing to get others to do the same thing? Are you willing to make the case that this is more important than the exhibit hall proposed for State Fair Park or improvements along the river or the convention center or the Core to Shore park?

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 07:55 PM
Maybe this will be as successful as the gas guzzler trollies that drive around empty all day ;-)

What a dumb comment. I hope you're just joking. Those "trollies" were designed for failure. They are not "transit" options. If you've ever tried to use those things as a functional form of transportation you might consider gouging out your own eyeballs.

It's apples and oranges.

Please consider that there are people who actually know how to deliver ridership and solutions for transit users.

This is a city of a million people, bigger than many cities that have successfully provided transit solutions for their citizens.

Transit in OKC has been poorly funded and designed for failure, or, in the case of the "trollies," treated as a novelty or amusement.

ssandedoc
05-12-2009, 07:55 PM
I stand with Jeff Bezdek.

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 08:00 PM
And I should note that OKC successfully provided a variety of transit options long ago in the past, so there's already a track record for success.

metro
05-12-2009, 08:08 PM
Steves right if you want this you will need to be very vocal about this!!!

CuatrodeMayo
05-12-2009, 08:21 PM
Based on what I'm hearing, if you really want to see transit on a MAPS 3 ballot, you will need to take extraordinary steps to make voices heard over those of competing interests. Are you willing to appear before council in the citizen's comment period after the agenda is completed? Are you willing to write or phone your council person? Are you willing to get others to do the same thing? Are you willing to make the case that this is more important than the exhibit hall proposed for State Fair Park or improvements along the river or the convention center or the Core to Shore park?

That indeed confirms my long-time fears...

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 08:26 PM
That indeed confirms my long-time fears...

It's not at all too late. Remember, the mayor made a big production of the MAPS III website, and how citizens could vote on what they wanted.

The citizens responded by supporting TRANSIT like three to one over everything else.

Nothing has been decided yet. It's not too late.

sroberts24
05-12-2009, 08:38 PM
i want to see this but don't think it is as important as core to shore or the river projects.... if we do those projects it will get more people here and then we will need street cars until then we need the other projects

CuatrodeMayo
05-12-2009, 08:49 PM
It's not at all too late. Remember, the mayor made a big production of the MAPS III website, and how citizens could vote on what they wanted.

The citizens responded by supporting TRANSIT like three to one over everything else.

Nothing has been decided yet. It's not too late.

If the city decides they know better and MAPS3 goes the way of big business, the franchise will be officially broken.

I'll do my part and write a letter.

If mass transit falls off the MAPS3 horizon, that may be the boot I need to get out of this town.

BPD
05-12-2009, 09:07 PM
I wait with baited breath

Sorry to sound pedantic, but I think you mean "bated breath" as in short for "abated."

mecarr
05-12-2009, 09:25 PM
Sorry, but it's getting very, very old. I'm working another 10-hour day and I see my place trashed on here all the time by the same people who don't mind copying and pasting our stuff on this site for the benefit of everyone but those who toiled to create it. I think it's time newspapers start standing up for their work.

I know a lot of people who really don't like their editorial section, but I the news section is usually pretty good.

dismayed
05-12-2009, 09:49 PM
So here's the real story for those who want to go beyond the hype: Jeff Bezdek is launching a web site that promotes including a downtown light rail circulator in MAPS 3. He's doing this after the push for transit in MAPS 3 lost momentum at the latest Greater OKC Chamber. Bezdek is an architect and downtown resident and advocate. I'm not sure if Bryan Dean has this story or not.
So are we any closer to getting a light rail system with this story? I'll leave it to you to decide if this is the most important story of the day.

Hi Steve, I'm sure I read your stories in The Oklahoman but my memory is not what it used to be. You mentioned that there was a lot of public support for light rail in MAPS 3, but then that lost momentum when it hit the OKC Chamber. I'm just wondering what the official reason that they gave for that was? I understand that there might be other things going on behind the scenes (there always are), but I'm just wondering how they publicly addressed the fact that their opinion was counter to what the public has been requesting?

hipsterdoofus
05-12-2009, 09:54 PM
Thanks for your support there ... Why is it a dumb comment? The trollies were designed for failure, what makes you think our city leaders will do something more intelligent now? I don't think its dumb at all, just realistic - theres alot of pie in the sky people on here, and while its good to have dreams, it needs to be balanced with reality occasionally - the last idea I heard was about mass transit to bricktown...which doesn't seem like a very good idea if you are trying to do what mass transit SHOULD do, which is relieve congestion. I haven't heard any decent ideas yet, so yes, color me pessimistic and no, don't feel the need to reply since anything that isn't for this idea is certainly "dumb" to you.


What a dumb comment. I hope you're just joking. Those "trollies" were designed for failure. They are not "transit" options. If you've ever tried to use those things as a functional form of transportation you might consider gouging out your own eyeballs.

It's apples and oranges.

Please consider that there are people who actually know how to deliver ridership and solutions for transit users.

This is a city of a million people, bigger than many cities that have successfully provided transit solutions for their citizens.

Transit in OKC has been poorly funded and designed for failure, or, in the case of the "trollies," treated as a novelty or amusement.

metro
05-12-2009, 09:57 PM
Just to clarify this is not the city's movement, at least not yet

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 10:00 PM
hipster,

Sorry, I didn't glean that from your comments. I just thought you were taking shots. Sorry.

I believe with the right plan in place, this could work. My garbage gets picked up every week on time. My water works. My dealings with police in OKC have been good. We obviously have a well-run city government, despite the apparent incompetence in the transit arena.

soonerguru
05-12-2009, 10:03 PM
If mass transit falls off the MAPS3 horizon, that may be the boot I need to get out of this town.

I have thought this exact thing. If we don't do it now, it will never happen here.

Core to Shore will take decades to fill in. I hope that's not the basket in which they're depositing all of our eggs.

I too am curious who, and what, would be moving the city (chamber, etc.) away from Transit. Wonder if Steve could enlighten us in that area.

metro
05-12-2009, 10:57 PM
FYI this is more than just modern streetcar.....

mOKCie
05-12-2009, 11:03 PM
It's past midnight and it's still just a splash page to me.

metro
05-13-2009, 05:38 AM
Check again Welcome | Modern Transit Project in Oklahoma City (http://www.mtpokc.com) content is now up and part of the gazette article is on the Gazette website, pick up a copy for full article...

Of Sound Mind
05-13-2009, 05:52 AM
The idea sounds really cool. I'm just very skeptical that the population at large will adopt it, or more importantly, use it.

CuatrodeMayo
05-13-2009, 07:25 AM
Great site.

urbanity
05-13-2009, 07:29 AM
Oklahoma Gazette story:
Answer to OKC transportation troubles may be possible MAPS 3 project | OKG Scene.com (http://tinyurl.com/odktsu)

BG918
05-13-2009, 07:30 AM
Will there eventually be maps of the proposed system?

Tex
05-13-2009, 07:39 AM
Will there eventually be maps of the proposed system?

http://www.mtpokc.com/img/about/connections.jpg

urbanity
05-13-2009, 08:01 AM
Oklahoma Gazette link:
Answer to OKC transportation troubles may be possible MAPS 3 project | OKG Scene.com (http://tinyurl.com/odktsu)

soonerguru
05-13-2009, 08:39 AM
The naysayers will be out in force today.